“highly significant”

In this location the positive correlation between the deposition of bird faeces and soil nitrogen stable isotope ratio ( δ 15 N) was also highly significant ( r s = 0.69, n = 20, p < 0.001), while it was negative for the carbon signature ( δ 13 C; r s = –0.70, n = 20, p < 0.001).

Direct comparison between AMO and AMOR revealed highly significant differences for both cytokines ( p < 0.001 for IL-1β and p < 0.01 for IL-6), confirming the superior anti-inflammatory efficacy of AMOR in this model.

The difference in the two ecological zones for kdr-e (L1014S) mutation was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Stage 3: Item Performance Analysis Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant ( p < 0.001), as was the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sample adequacy (0.85).

The mean of severity scoring index (SSI) among the patients showed a highly significant decrease from 10.2±5.8 (range 3- 29) to 7.8±5.7 (range 2 – 27) after one year of treatment (p<0.001).

There was a highly significant correlation between the vitreous concentration of tenascin-C and periostin in the 133 eyes with PDR (r = 0.470, p<0.001; Spearman correlation; Figure 1B ).

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.282).

A highly significant association was found between acuity group and recorded pre-hospital intervention ( p ≤ 0.001).

There were highly significant differences in microbiota composition between treated and untreated quails in caecum ( t = 1.652, P = 0.001), faeces ( t = 1.759, P = 0.001), and large intestine, although the level of significance of the latter was lower than the other two origins ( t = 1.512, P = 0.036).

The model was highly significant ( x 2 = 28.78, d . f . = 4, P < 0.001) with a correct classification rate of 66.12%.

Not surprisingly, the main effect of serial position was highly significant in all three ANOVAs ( p < 0.001, η p 2 > 0.48).

Endoscopic evaluation and activity scoring Endoscopic evaluation demonstrated a highly significant reduction of disease activity scores (z=−5.156, p<0.001).

Marker–trait association results revealed a highly significant association between both markers and the phenotypes ( p -value < 0.001) ( Figure 3 A,B).

Moreover, auditory and visual hallucinations showed a highly significant difference between admitted and discharged patients (each p < 0.001).

Musk deer relative abundance showed highly significant differences among study areas (F 5,49 = 27.82, P<0.001).

Phase synchronization The PLV of the theta frequency band between the ACC and right BA40 showed a highly significant Group effect, F (1, 27) = 14.85, p < 0.001.

The application’s results were positively associated with the caries level at a statistically highly significant level (p < 0.001) in all age groups.

Statistically, the MSG group exhibited a highly significant increase in collagen deposition as well as myometrial thickening compared to the control group ( p < 0.001).

When these times were compared using a paired t -test the result was highly significant (t = 5.88, df = 20, p < 0.001).

The most likely explanation for the highly significant reduction of SNV numbers at genes versus intergenic regions ( p <0.001 in case of both cisplatin and cyclophosphamide, χ 2 test) is the activity of transcription-coupled repair (TCR), which can remove single strand lesions in an error-free manner [ 40 ].

Plant presence significantly influenced soil total nitrogen and the C/N ratio ( p < 0.05), and exerted highly significant effects on the C/P and N/P ratios ( p < 0.001), whereas aggregate size showed no significant main effect.

Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) confirmed the statistical significance of the above differences, showing highly significant variations in community composition among different degradation gradient groups (R 2 = 0.737, p = 0.001).

Comparison of ECW/TBW and Frailty Index Between Groups A highly significant difference was observed in the ECW/TBW ratio ( p < 0.001), with Group 2 exhibiting a higher mean value (49.4 ± 2.7%) compared to Group 1 (46.9 ± 2.6%).

31 The estimated coefficient of the parameter λ 1 that associates the random effect a to the amount of medication cost were small in magnitude for both IPW and CAL-S analyses, but was highly significant ( p =< 0.001 ) .

Furthermore, total leukocyte count (TLC) was notably lower in patients with EV (4.47 ± 2.33) than in those without (6.52 ± 2.16), with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001).