“highly significant”

ANOSIM indicated that differences in the prey spectra between the three species were highly significant at prey family-level (R = 0.784, P < 0.001) but non-significant at the level of order (R = 0.079, P = 0.063).

All path coefficients (direct effects), except between Psychological distress and Pain intensity ( p = 0.054), were highly significant (all other p -values <0.001).

The variable Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant test was highly significant (p < 0.001) in this model.

However, when the study group was compared with control group, it was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The K values decreased further in the postoperative period and the change was highly significant ( P < 0.001) as compared to preoperative value but not significant ( P = 0.059) when compared to intraoperative values. α-angle (which represents the speed of solid clot formation) measured at preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative time points had mean values of 54.80 ± 5.40 min, 61.94 ± 7.87 min, and 68.57 ± 5.70 min, respectively [ Table 3 ].

KaplanMeier survival times curves showed particularly lower survival probability over time for MMPPI score >8 [ Figure 2 ] and a highly significant difference between the four MMPPI categories (Chi-square statistic = 230, P < 0.001).

In contrast, the mortality rates of snails in the WPN group, WPN + SHAM group, and WPN + SHAM# groups showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) at time points from 6 to 48 h (Additional file 9 : Table S4).

Note that also when pooling the data of the 2 grid positions, the EM effect in MG is still highly significant (shift = 0.11, P < 0.001; Bootstrap CIs = [0.096 0.126]).

The increase was highly significant in the item “defines clear goals for further treatment” (mean change 0.80, p = 0.001).

In the paired comparison of C/C versus T/C and C/C versus T/T, the C/C group had highly significant VAS or pain perception than T/C ( P < 0.001) and T/T ( P < 0.001) in all periods [ Table 3 ].

The inflammatory state of the pulp tissue as reflected by MMP-9/TP levels and NaOCl lavage had a highly significant ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively) impact on pulp survival, while mild preoperative discomfort did not.

Patients with depression after PAO showed a highly significant negative correlation with SF-36 by Pearson correlation (p < 0.001).

A highly significant correlation existed between Ra and VW ( p = 0.001, R 2 = 0.9803).

cuniculi when compared with IVR applied in the same concentration (50 μg/ml or 100 μg/ml), with a statistically highly significant differences for both concentrations 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours post-exposure ( P value = 0.001***) (Table 3 and Fig. 2 ).

As the effect associated with NHS healthcare experiences in the partial model excluding trust is very highly significant (AOR=1.46, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.67, p<0.001), although lower than the effect associated with trust in the partial model excluding NHS healthcare experiences (AOR=2.06, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.36, p<0.001; AOR=2.06, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.36, p<0.001), it seems plausible that the effect of NHS healthcare experiences on uptake may be mediated by trust: a possibility to which we shall return in the exploratory analysis presented in the following subsection.

A highly significant association exists between CFS score and mortality (p<0.001).

In contrast, the expression differences of PD-1 and LAG-3 on the surface of CD8 + T cells in peripheral blood between DLBCL patients and normal individuals were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The mean (± SEM) cAL increase was 11 ± 2 μm at 3 D, 14 ± 2 μm at 6 D, and 26 ± 2 μm at 9 D, with all pairwise comparisons highly significant (all P < 0.001), except the difference between the 3 and 6 D stimuli ( P = 0.48).

The Cox-model found a significant influence of water status (p < 0.01) and a highly significant influence of extreme precipitation events (p < 0.001) as determinants for survival.

Table 1 displays the distribution of negative and positive cases of beta-hemolytic infections, as determined by PCR analysis, revealing a highly significant relationship ( P < 0.001).

Correlation equations proved a highly significant correlation of AoR baseline z -scores with losartan dosages, showing that more affected patients received higher up-titrated losartan dosages ( r = 0.407, p < 0.001; Fig. 4 c), thereby keeping AoR progressions constant, independent of baseline AoR z -scores (Fig. 4 d).

The difference between the investigation types of disease detection between the two waves was highly significant (P<0.001).

For all areas of assessment, the increase in SI from pre- to post-contrast imaging, measured semi-quantitatively was highly significant (p < 0.001) and greatest for the dorsal areas.

Associations between regional CBF and CoV for all territories but the proximal MCA (t = −1.49, p = 0.14) and middle MCA (t = −1.29, p = 0.20) were highly significant (p < 0.001); all associations were negative.

The interaction term potentially allowed the effects of a pharmacologic agent to vary by pulse; because an omnibus likelihood ratio test indicated that interaction term was highly significant ( p < 0.001 for both AUC and Max Change), this term was retained in the final model.