Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After adjusting for baseline GAD-7 scores, marital status, and residence using ANCOVA, the group difference remained highly significant, F (1, 146) = 42.8, p < .001, partial η 2 = 0.226, with adjusted mean difference of 4.4 points (95% CI 3.2, 5.6) and adjusted means of 6.4 ( SE = 0.4) for the VR group versus 10.8 ( SE = 0.4) for the control group.
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In our study, both tests showed a highly significant correlation to each other (Wilcoxon rank-sum test; p = 0.001), but 60% of all participants showed better stereo acuity levels when tested with the Titmus test compared to the TNO test.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These sequential effects were highly significant (previous stimulus: t (31) = 8.572, P < 0.001; previous response: t (31) = 8.317, P < 0.001), and their magnitudes and attraction profiles were consistent with earlier reports [ 27 , 31 , 38 ], following a first derivative of Gaussian (DoG) curve (previous stimulus: amplitude = 2.91° [2.18 3.60], peak location = 20.28° [18.60 22.75]; previous response: amplitude = 4.10° [3.06 5.15], peak location = 22.48° [19.95 25.05]).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pairwise nonparametric among-species comparisons yielded highly significant results between N. obliqua and N. glauca for both parameters ( P < 0.001), significant results between N. obliqua and N. alpina for A ( P < 0.05), and between N. alpina and N. glauca for H E ( P < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant differences were observed for calcium (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 42.8, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.368, and phosphorus (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 53.6, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.422, with post-hoc comparisons indicating significant differences between all groups.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
the association between X and Y for different levels of M) showed a highly significant effect (t = − 3.76, p < 0.001) in participants with low perspective taking scores, whereas the association between right-wing extremism and willingness to help was not significant in participants with medium (t = − 1.74, p = 0.083) or high (t = 0.64, p = 0.520) scores in perspective taking.
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
3.2.2 Model 2: age-related brain changes as defined by GM volume As a second aspect of age-related brain changes, GM volume exhibited a highly significant positive predictive effect on episodic functioning (β = 59.65, SE = 4.64, t = 12.87, p <0.001), suggesting an association between greater GM volume and better episodic performance.