We detected highly significant fits (p < 0.001) for weekly and monthly data with R 2 and MAPE values of 0.948, and 21.622% and 0.955 and 29.316%, respectively, whereas for the annual data, we detected significance at the p < 0.05 level, with a higher MAPE value (52.96%).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
After adjusting for baseline GAD-7 scores, marital status, and residence using ANCOVA, the group difference remained highly significant, F (1, 146) = 42.8, p < .001, partial η 2 = 0.226, with adjusted mean difference of 4.4 points (95% CI 3.2, 5.6) and adjusted means of 6.4 ( SE = 0.4) for the VR group versus 10.8 ( SE = 0.4) for the control group.
In our study, both tests showed a highly significant correlation to each other (Wilcoxon rank-sum test; p = 0.001), but 60% of all participants showed better stereo acuity levels when tested with the Titmus test compared to the TNO test.
These sequential effects were highly significant (previous stimulus: t (31) = 8.572, P < 0.001; previous response: t (31) = 8.317, P < 0.001), and their magnitudes and attraction profiles were consistent with earlier reports [ 27 , 31 , 38 ], following a first derivative of Gaussian (DoG) curve (previous stimulus: amplitude = 2.91° [2.18 3.60], peak location = 20.28° [18.60 22.75]; previous response: amplitude = 4.10° [3.06 5.15], peak location = 22.48° [19.95 25.05]).
Our results showed a highly significant expression of DMP1 (4.86‐fold; p < 0.001), NRF1 (1.66‐fold; p < 0.02) and RUNX2 (1.5‐fold; p < 0.05) in HSV‐1‐infected hPDLSCs compared to uninfected hPDLCs cultured in osteogenic media (Figure 4B ).
A highly significant correlation was observed among various carotenoids in the feed ( p < 0.001).
Pairwise nonparametric among-species comparisons yielded highly significant results between N. obliqua and N. glauca for both parameters ( P < 0.001), significant results between N. obliqua and N. alpina for A ( P < 0.05), and between N. alpina and N. glauca for H E ( P < 0.05).
Highly significant differences were observed for calcium (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 42.8, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.368, and phosphorus (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 53.6, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.422, with post-hoc comparisons indicating significant differences between all groups.
the association between X and Y for different levels of M) showed a highly significant effect (t = − 3.76, p < 0.001) in participants with low perspective taking scores, whereas the association between right-wing extremism and willingness to help was not significant in participants with medium (t = − 1.74, p = 0.083) or high (t = 0.64, p = 0.520) scores in perspective taking.
3.2.2 Model 2: age-related brain changes as defined by GM volume As a second aspect of age-related brain changes, GM volume exhibited a highly significant positive predictive effect on episodic functioning (β = 59.65, SE = 4.64, t = 12.87, p <0.001), suggesting an association between greater GM volume and better episodic performance.
The effects of both breed and demonstration were highly significant (Breed: Wald χ 2 = 13.9, P < 0.001; Demonstration: Wald χ 2 = 19.6, P < 0.001), and there was no significant interaction between breed and demonstration (Wald χ 2 = 0.18, P = 0.67).
The brake was further evaluated in more complex models comparing models without the brake (models 3–4, table 2 ) to models with the brake (models 5–6, table 2 ) suggesting increased fit and a highly significant deviance in favor of the “brake” function comparing the best fitted models (6d & 4d) (chi2 = 67, df≈2, p<.001).
The effect was highly significant under a binomial test at the group level ( p < 0.001 for all spatial frequency combinations) as well as at the individual level ( p < 0.001 for all observers).
This association remained highly significant but was less evident when restricting these analyses to only include patients with detectable pretreatment ccfHPV DNA (adjusted HR, 13.4; 95% CI, 4.9–36.9; p < .001) (Table S10 and Figure S4) .
There was a highly significant decrease in the final body weights of rats in the T2DM ( p < 0.001), TRF 30 ( p < 0.001), TRF 60 ( p < 0.01), TRF 120 ( p < 0.01) and DON ( p < 0.001) groups compared to the CON group.
Since the correlation coefficient of all regressions were highly significant (r≥0.95; p ≤0.001), we were able to produce standard curves using blood samples of each mouse (absorbance at 540 nm versus blood volume) in order to provide a rough estimation of the blood intake by each individual mosquito.
The distance-based AMOVA analysis revealed genetic variance among and within the populations were highly significant (P<0.001) and the variation within subgroups (89%) was significantly higher than that among subgroups (11%) ( Table 4 ).
Path analyses indicated that the direct path from depression to QoL was highly significant (β = 0.53, p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41, 0.64) as was the direct path from disability to QoL (β = 0.53, p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.66).
In all genotypes, the linear regression between both water indicators was highly significant ( p < 0.001), but not very strong (r 2 ranging from 0.61 to 0.80) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
There were highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in the mean D. noxia population, leaf chlorosis, leaf rolling, plant stunting, number of tillers per plant, and the percentage of infested tillers per plant between the resistant and susceptible varieties.
In accordance, our study demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in the technique’s performance by using a red instead of a brown chromogen in primary melanomas.
This decrease was highly significant (p < 0.001) with an effect size of 68%.
There was a highly significant effect of Trial-type, F(3, 54) = 108, p<.001.
These differences among years were highly significant ( X 2 (9) = 58.62, p<0.001), confirming the value of the sensitivity analysis excluding year 2010.
The relation between these factors and weight loss in patients was shown to be highly significant [ X 2 (2) = 40.53; p < 0.001, V = 0.36].