“highly significant”

All terms which are a function of age of the participant in all the models were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Comparing WID‐qEC levels in all 22 cancer cases that had WID‐qEC test results available with either all cancer‐free women or all women without a cancer diagnosis (i.e., cancer‐free and women without adequate histology combined) showed highly significant differences ( p <.001) (Figure 2B ).

One-Way ANOVA indicated highly significant effects of model variant on Clean Accuracy (F = 26.21, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.019), Adversarial Accuracy (F = 168.39, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.112), and Robustness Drop (F = 124.28, p < 0.001).

Paired samples t -test analysis confirmed that this reduction was highly significant ( t = 10.278, p < 0.001).

On statistical analysis the difference between means of P100 latency for the visual angles 15 and 30 minutes with reference to its value for 120 minutes (8 × 8) was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

In the model with ACE/non-ACE as a fixed effect, the variable was highly significant in the prediction ( p < 0.001).

As expected in the MoBaNeuroCog sample, all total brain measures and WM, were significantly non-linearly related to age, as indicated by estimated degrees of freedom (edf) substantially greater than 1 and highly significant smooth terms (area: edf=5.52, F=143.1, p < .001; volume: edf=7.17, F=78.7, p < .001; thickness: edf=5.23, F=62.0, p < .001; WM: edf =4.74, F=213.4, p < .001).

Coefficients for the PWB and FWB were highly significant (p < 0.001) compared to the EWB (p < 0.05) (Table 4 A, OLS Model 2).

LINC01419 and AK021443 showed significantly increasing linear trend estimates (0.696 [0.663–0.727] and 0.688 [0.654–0.720]) with p < 0.001, while mRNA AF070632 showed a highly significant decreasing trend (−0.553 [(−0.595)–(−0.509)] ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 1 ).

Moreover, participants who expressed the need for further information about their procedure were more likely to display preoperative anxiety with 74.5% of those who requested additional information showing anxiety in comparison with 43.2% who did not with a highly significant association ( P < 0.001).

When only LULC changed (climate static) from 2001 to 2075, changes in projected ranges from 2001 were highly significant ( p <0.001; paired t-test) but were never more than 20% (either positive or negative).

Results The GBD analysis revealed that discontinuous breastfeeding was a highly significant risk factor for childhood AD (R2 = 0.21, p<0.001) and remained a key independent predictor in the final multivariate model (p = 0.016).

The difference in the platelet count response between the groups with and without concurrent plasma exchange was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001 by Fisher's exact test). 4.

Likewise, liver bacterial load results showed that compared with the PC group, the P and C groups exhibited significantly reduced liver bacterial load (P < 0.05), while the CPH and CPL groups demonstrated highly significant reduction ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 6 D).

Findings We observed a highly significant correlation between the predicted and measured proportions of V1/S and FCR3 alleles in mixed laboratory samples (all p < 0.001).

The initial column (Table A6) considers only ED attendances and migration status in 2017, revealing that first- and second-generation immigrants experience positive and highly significant differences of 2.9% and 5.1% (1), respectively, compared to Swiss natives ( p < 0.001).

The diagnostic power of C1M, C3M, C4M and C4M12a1 was highly significant with an AUROC ≥83% (p < 0.001).

The highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001) suggests a meaningful difference in the mean scores of the dependent variable across the treatment groups.

In multiple comparisons, all three pair-based comparisons were highly significant with a p -value of <0.001.

Distributional analysis using violin plots, density plots, and the Kruskal–Wallis test (α = 0.05) to compare state-level distributions for the key sociodemographic and health profile variables indicated highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) with multimodal distributions confirming substantial heterogeneity across the sampled states ( Supplementary Figure 26 ).

P<0.05 was considered significant and marked as *, P<0.01 as highly significant and marked as **, and P<0.001 was very highly significant and marked as ***.

There was a highly significant difference in mean values of active foot dorsiflexion in the ankle joint after BTA-ABO application versus initial values before treatment ( p < 0.001) ( Table I ).

Expression was detected only in the intra-mammalian stages of the parasite lifecycle with the egg stage showing about 3-fold increase in expression when compared with the other stages and this increase was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) (Figure 6 ).

The full model, which included Morphotype, Location, and their interaction, was highly significant (F(4, 27) = 7.2961, R 2 = 0.5194, p = 0.001), explaining over 51% of the total variance in symbiont community composition.

All associations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).