“highly significant”

Proline content showed a highly significant positive correlation with TSS ( r = 0.992, p < 0.001), supporting their coordinated role in osmotic adjustment.

6o ) ratios in the CNS, a highly significant decrease in both ratios was observed between the group receiving five million hAECs and the PBS control group ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively).

The two-way ANOVA results reveal the significant main effects of period (F(1, 3551) = 582.15, p < .001) and group (F(2, 3551) = 140.14, p < .001) as well as the highly significant interaction between them (F(2, 3551) = 899.69, p < .001).

The female animals revealed a highly significant decline in CSA between 16 and 21 months of age, irrespective of diet (multivariate test: age effect P < 0.001; age * diet interaction P = 0.35).

AMOVA ( Table 2 ) showed highly significant genetic differentiation among species as well as among populations within species ( P < 0.001 in both cases).

The results of the Bartlett test of sphericity were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating homogeneity of variance through the consumption of foods.

The unadjusted ORs were significant for the two levels: some problems and extreme problems in all EQ-5D, with extreme problems being highly significant (p<0.001) (see online supplementary table S5).

Pearson correlation coefficients of the pre- and post scrubbing results were close to 1 and highly significant (gradient one: left R = 0.9964, right R = 0.9958; gradient two: left = 0.9348, right = 0.8816; all p values <0.001).

After excluding Pzeb1 from further analyses, F ST values still remained highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The difference between population-wide asymmetries of DnaA and DNA (DAPI or HU) concentrations is highly significant ( p < 0.001) when cells are aligned according to the HU or DAPI content.

This reduction (28/41 = 68.3% patients with improvement) was highly significant (Cochran’s Q test, p < 0.001).

Furthermore, BPI scores at 3 months postoperatively were significantly lower than those at 1 month postoperatively, indicating a highly significant reduction ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 4 ).

Trails B response time produced a highly significant R square change of 0.280 ( F = 29.54, df = 1, 76, p < 0.001) as did WCS perseverative errors with a R square change of 0.081, ( F = 9.55, df = 1, 75, p = 0.003).

A highly significant effect of Change was observed, F (1, 68) = 15.31, p <.001, η 2 p =.18, indicating faster responses when color was repeated (M = 863.92, SD = 79.72) compared with when changed (M = 877.85, SD = 79.617), and neither significant effects of Preceding Distractor Value, F (2,136) = 2.16, p =.119, η 2 p =.03, nor a significant interaction, F (2,136) =.54, p =.581, η 2 p <.01.

The difference between the groups was highly significant (P < 0.001; Figure 1C ).

BC comp ) was always highly significant ( p < 0.001 ).

Mean Corpuscular Volume showed a highly significant peak LOD score of 6.8 on chromosome 7 at 79 Mb and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Content had a peak LOD score of 8.2 on chromosome 7 at 86 Mb (corrected p values < 0.001, Fig. 3C, 3D ).

For instance, Moran's I for spatial heteroskedasticity in the most vegetated snapshot of the scale-dependent data was only 0.021, but was highly significant ( p = 0.001) because the sample size was n = 10,000.

Additionally, QoL improved and this was highly significant ( P = 0.001) ( Table 1 ).

However, there was a highly significant main effect of processing condition [ F (2, 22) = 46.07, p < .001].

A Pearson’s chi-squared test revealed a highly significant association between site and infection status (χ2 = 67.33, df = 3, p < 0.001), indicating strong spatial heterogeneity in parasite transmission risk across the region ( Figure 2 ).

A two-way ANOVA indicated highly significant effects of salinity stress ( p < 0.001), EXc ( p < 0.001), EXd ( p < 0.001), and their interactions ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 3 ).

5-ALA-FIGR improved the GTR in GBM to >64% [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ] and when compared to white light microsurgery 5-ALA-FIGR was highly significant ( p < 0.001) [ 5 ].

There was highly significant interaction of image noise and SNR with the GSI and pitch ( p = 0.001).

This increase attained statistical significance at 12 hpi ( p < 0.05) and demonstrated a highly significant difference at 24 hpi ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 B).