Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Of note, when Ctrl was matched to Riva, corrected Kaplan-Meier analyses during the total FU revealed highly significant differences for both endpoints: rates of hospitalization for new-onset of AF ( Figure 1 , p < 0.001) as well as rates of SCD ( Figure 2 , p < 0.001). 4 Discussion The COVID-19 pandemic led to a burgeoning population of patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection and is still affecting healthcare systems worldwide.
highly significantp ≤ .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlations between resilience, requiring factors of the work, overall job satisfaction, intention to leave nursing, and quality of care Highly significant correlations were found between resilience, requiring factors of the work, overall job satisfaction, intention to leave nursing, and quality of care (p ≤ .001) (Table 3 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
3A to D , the candidate recovered viruses, namely, rAdv-ChGM-CSF, rAdv-HN, and rAdv-ChGM-CSF-HN, had highly significant ( P < 0.001) mRNA gene expression differences in the HEK-293A-infected cells compared to the wtAdv-infected cells and nonchallenged [NC] noninfected cells.
highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the temporal patterns of total epizootics ( Fig 2A ) and human cases ( Fig 2D ) (based on data from the Ministry of Health) and the YFV infection in NHP studied here were roughly equivalent ( Fig 2B ), and the temporal smooth was both highly significant (P<0.001; Table 2 ) and accounted for a large proportion of the model deviance (R = 0.54 and R = 0.22; Table 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
SNP Numbers, Coverage, and Correlations The mean number of sequencing reads (mean ± 1 S.D.) generated per individual from tissue samples (1,608,863 ± 307,130) was 2.1× more than the number of reads generated from swab samples (518,985 ± 238,072), and this was a highly significant difference ( Table S2 ; t = 9.693, p < 0.001).
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding elongation at break, higher values were obtained for non-crosslinked scaffolds versus crosslinked scaffolds and weaker values obtained for the collagen reference compared to coll/chit blends in general were shown to be statistically highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).