“marginal significance”

As for its statistical analysis result, it showed only marginal significance ( P = 0.053) in the final multivariable model, but it was retained after the rigorous screening process.

Overall, women had a higher frequency of chronic low self-esteem than men, albeit at marginal significance: 16.5% vs. 4.5% (Pearson’s chi-squared = 3.744; p = 0.053).

The mean maximum tension of the nonwounded abdominal wall declined gradually with the age of the mouse: 9%, 7% and 11% in the three consecutive time intervals; but this trend had only marginal significance (p = 0.053, ANOVA).

Full model (BRI + BMI + WC) In the full model, BRI Q4 retained marginal significance (OR = 11.70, P = 0.053), while BMI-based and waist-based obesity remained non-significant.

The relationship between age and anger recognition only reached marginal significance ( P = 0.053).

For instance, in left maxillary 1st premolars, the marginal significance ( p = 0.053) for 1MPM1 suggests a potential shift in root canal anatomy with increasing age.

Non‐degrading stimuli were less often correctly rejected (averaged across both conditions) in the OWC (27.93 ± 2.79) compared to the NWC group (30.34 ± 2.73; t 47 = 3.029, p = 0.004, d = 0.874) and—with marginal significance—also compared to the BED group (29.47 ± 2.68; t 49 = 1.982, p = 0.053, d = 0.564), in a main effect of Group for correct rejection ( F 2, 76 = 4.713, p < 0.0167, ƞ p 2 = 0.110).

One variable showed marginal significance of association with NL: visits to diabetes clinic ( p = 0.053).

3G ) were confirmed lower in plasmas of LUADs than HCs but only reaching marginal significance ( P = 0.053).

Changes in dietary behaviors significantly progressed ( P = 0.015) while that in exercise habits approached a marginal significance ( P = 0.053) after the intervention.

For parents, support provision was explained both by linear effects of their own anxiety ( B 1 = −0.30, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001) and by quadratic effects reflecting higher levels of their own anxiety, which reached marginal significance ( B 3 = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.053).

In addition, IL-1RA concentrations differed with a statistically marginal significance ( p = 0.0535) between the two severity subgroups.

S7 , the low NLR cutoff subgroup exhibited predictive value for AKI (OR 1.526, 95% CI 1.38–1.68, p < 0.001) without significant inter-study heterogenicity ( I 2 = 29.1%), whereas the high-cutoff group showed limited predictive utility with marginal significance (OR 1.334, 95% CI 1.00–1.79, p = 0.0535) and the heterogenicity in this subgroup remained significant ( I 2 = 93%).

( 42 ), NLR had a statistically significant association with ORR (p = 0.016), while PLR had a marginal significance (p = 0.0536). 3.2.6 Head and neck cancers A study by Lee et al.

More, marginal significance was observed for loss of liberty (U = 70.98, p < 0.054).

Furthermore, the presence of IICP symptoms before surgery showed a marginal significance (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 0.99–5.30, p = 0.054).

As evident from the table, the inhibition [(RT differences between incongruent and congruent trials)/congruent trials] of the Flanker task exhibited a negative correlation with general anxiety, albeit with marginal significance ( r =-.292, p =.054), which suggests that weaker ability of inhibition (higher score) is associated with lower anxiety.

Notably, certain variables exhibited marginal significance in univariate analysis (e.g., BUN in the internal validation cohort, p = 0.054).

A similar pattern was observed for the left caudate, but the negative associations in both male and female participants reached only a marginal significance level ( P = 0.054 or 0.055, respectively) (Fig. 2 ).

However, we noticed that the MDA concentrations were lower in PCOS patients with the dominant genotype of VDR-TaqI than in PCOS patients carrying the TT genotype, but the observed difference had marginal significance ( p = 0.054).

Body weight showed marginal significance ( p = 0.054), indicating a potential but inconclusive trend.

In a fully saturated model simultaneously including sex, mechanical ventilation and comorbidity count (six predictors for 33 events, well beyond the events-per-variable limit), the AISI effect retained a comparable magnitude (aOR 2.57) but reached only marginal significance (95% CI 0.98–6.72, p = 0.054), an attenuation attributable to over-parameterization rather than to loss of signal, and one that underscores why the pre-specified parsimonious model was the appropriate primary specification.

Cox regression analysis identified lymph node metastasis as the only independent risk factor for reduced PFS (p = 0.004), with MLH1/PMS2 loss showing marginal significance (p = 0.054) [ 7 ].

In the multivariate analysis, high HCT‐CI (≥3) was the only independent factor for higher NRM (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.11–7.90; p = 0.030), and ECOG score ≥2 was the only independent factor for inferior OS (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.15–5.16; p = 0.020) and DFS (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.13–4.02; p = 0.020), with marginal significance of disease status at transplantation for DFS (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 0.99–4.88; p = 0.054) (Table 4 ).

Additionally, marginal significance was found in physical functioning (PF, p=0.054) and in role physical (RP, p=0.060).