“marginal significance”

ether/plasmalogen PCs or unsaturated PCs, were found in lower level in the severe compared to the moderate category of patients with marginal significance (p<0.10).

Thereafter, to construct combined prediction models, factors with marginal significance ( P < 0.1) in univariate logistic regression were included in multivariable logistic regression.

In the initial univariate screening, variables with marginal significance (P<0.1) were identified as potential prognostic factors and included in the multivariate Cox regression model for further validation.

Similarly for IMMACULATE, the fully adjusted HRs were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04–1.22) for MACE and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.01–1.22) for HF and only the fully adjusted model showed significant improvement from the unadjusted model with significance for IDI ( p -value < 0.05) and marginal significance for cNRI ( p -value < 0.10).

However, if we also consider the marginal significance ( p = 0.10), the RMSSD, variable extracted from the ECG signal, was seen to be different between the two groups ( p = 0.06), with the emotions judged as positive eliciting higher values for RMSSD than negative counterparts.

Exact two-sided p-values are reported; * indicates statistical significance ( p < 0.05) and × indicates marginal significance (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

These analyses were performed using R 4.1.0 (R core Team) with significant differences defined at p < 0.05, and a marginal significance at p < 0.1.

( 2015 ) criterion for “marginal significance” ( P < 0.10).

Additionally, the interaction term reached a marginal significance level (β = 0.063, p < 0.1), and the model’s explanatory power increased to R 2 = 0.264, with a change in R 2 of 0.004.

Five other variables reached marginal significance (p < 0.1).

Variables that reached statistical significance ( P < 0.05) or marginal significance ( P < 0.10) in bivariate comparisons were subsequently entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis using forward and backward stepwise selection method to identify significantly independent factors associated with RVR and SVR.

The model with the additional covariates showed marginal significance (at p < 0.10) for social participation ( p = 0.079).

VA by race showed marginal significance (p=0.1), with Whites having the highest VA (40%), followed by Blacks (32%) and Hispanics (20%).

Outcomes with marginal significance (p-value of ≤ 0.10), considered for further exploration through storytelling sessions, included those associated with a specific advisory group (questions regarding shared partnership values, and research outcomes), respondent role (staff may have greater comfort in group decision-making, and community may feel pressured to conform in decision-making), and frequency of involvement (questions regarding shared partnership values, collaborative decision-making, and education and research initiatives).

When the control variables were added, this coefficient was reduced to marginal significance (Model 14 coeff.: −0.097, p < .10).

The incidence of postoperative complication was higher in the lower extremity group but with marginal significance (0% vs 36.3%, P = 0.1).

Those factors meeting marginal significance (p < 0.1) on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate binary logistic regression model.

Variables that achieved statistical significance ( p < 0.05) or marginal significance ( p < 0.10) in the univariate analysis were entered into the multiple logistic regression analysis to identify significant independent factors.

Predictors achieving marginal significance (p value < 0.10) were entered in a multivariable logistic regression model.

However, education showed marginal significance in models with coworker homophily ( p < 0.10).

The relationship of threat perceptions and changes in conspiracy thinking had only marginal significance, however ( b = 0.07, p < 0.10).

The significance level was set at p < 0.05, and the marginal significance level was set at p < 0.1.

Main effects and pairwise differences were considered significant if p < 0.05, while a marginal significance was considered in the case of 0.05 < p < 0.1.

The multivariate regression model was performed using factors that showed marginal significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis and those widely known to affect immunocompetence (age) [ 20 ].

Furthermore, increased functional connectivity with a marginal significance (t=3.84 P<0.1) was noticed for alpha2 band between the auditory cortex (BA21, 22) and the right DLPFC and OFC ( Figure 3c ).