“marginal significance”

The incidence of postoperative complication was higher in the lower extremity group but with marginal significance (0% vs 36.3%, P = 0.1).

Furthermore, increased functional connectivity with a marginal significance (t=3.84 P<0.1) was noticed for alpha2 band between the auditory cortex (BA21, 22) and the right DLPFC and OFC ( Figure 3c ).

Direct victimization was related to substance use ( p ≤ 0.05) with no controls included (Model 3), but decreased to marginal significance ( p ≤ 0.10) once controls were added in Model 4.

The multivariate regression model was performed using factors that showed marginal significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis and those widely known to affect immunocompetence (age) [ 20 ].

Data with marginal significance (p value <0.1) were also discussed.

Statistical analysis confirmed a significant preference for LA over HA in Korean, with marginal significance in GPT-3.5-turbo (z = −1.63, p = 0.10).

However, the marginal significance level ( p < 0.1) warrants cautious interpretation.

Statistical significance was indicated if P < 0.05 and marginal significance if 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

Although no individual time points demonstrated significant differences, p values with marginal significance were observed at 1 and 6 hours after processing (p = 0.10 and p = 0.12, respectively; ( Table 1 ).

The model explained 20.9% of the variance in K6 scores at post-intervention with marginal significance ( p = 0.10).

7 experimental days or 7 meal components), marginal significance ( P <0.1) is also indicated so the reader will be able to reach own conclusions about these results.

The level of amputation approached marginal significance ( p ≈ 0.10), suggesting a possible trend toward more severe outcomes in the non-MR group.

In addition, the visual cortex also showed decreased activation power in the VD group, but with marginal significance (two-sided test, face condition: P < 0.1; object condition: P < 0.1).

Our results about RFI shows that four studies with a marginal significance ( P = 0.10, I 2 = 0%) recorded RFI, which means that UTI treatment could protect renal function in CPB patients, this finding is consistent with a retrospective study [ 52 ]. previous studies [ 53 , 54 ] proved that the systematic inflammatory response syndrome in CPB plays a vital role in the development of RFI, and other studies had found a correlation between UTI treatment and multiple organ function protection [ 55 ].

At one standard deviation below the mean of perceived atmosphere, the change between T1 and T2 is negative for the psychological and the physical domains (estimate = -.106, p = .009 and estimate = -.074, p = .10; marginal significance), but not for the social and the environmental domains (estimate = -.141, p = .11 and estimate -.009, p = .867, respectively) (Fig. 2 ).

Variables showing associations with a p -value < 0.05 and with marginal significance in the univariable analysis ( p -value < 0.1) were entered into the multivariable model.

Between all early responder groups, SRF only varied for the aER between baseline and 3 months with marginal significance ( p < 0.1).

As expected, the temporal stability in C 4 ANPP was greater than C 3 ANPP (paired t -test; df=23; t =−3.26; P= 0.003) on average 18.3% across all treatments with marginal significance (paired t -test; P <0.1) in the unwarmed (paired t -test; P= 0.08) and clipped treatments (paired t -test; P= 0.07) ( Fig. 1b ), primarily because C 4 species had greater production due possibly to the inherent higher water and nitrogen use efficiency 6 10 14 .

Entered factors included those with at least marginal significance (P < 0.1) on univariate analysis, using enter method.

Sensitivity analysis reveals that removing Montana, North Dakota, or South Dakota from the sample attenuates this coefficient to marginal significance ( p < 0.1).

Variables showing associations with a p <0.05 and with a marginal significance in the univariable analysis (p <0.1) were entered into the multivariable model.

But Farm A showed marginal significance ( p < 0.1) of phage administration to reduced mortality in the next week following phage administration ( Fig. 3 A).

An interaction effect of chronic stress with linear rather than squared basal cortisol approached marginal significance in predicting parent-reported INTadj given a very severe PH, p = 0.10, and was significant in predicting self-reported INTadj given a very severe PH, p = 0.013, as well as parent-reported and self-reported INTadj given no PH, p = 0.010 and p = 0.007, respectively.

Five genes showed marginal significance (0.05 < p < 0.1, Figure 7B ): LRP1 ( p = 0.0556), SZT2 ( p = 0.0638), FAT3 ( p = 0.0654), RB1 ( p = 0.0866) and DNAH9 ( p = 0.0906).

For exercise, there was marginal significance at p < 0.10 [ 49 ] for the interaction effect between group and time (F(1, 118) = 3.474, p = 0.065, partial η 2 = 0.029).