marginally non-significantp = 0.07
Intensity and perceived consequences of nightmares retained their significant association with psychotic experiences, but the effect of resulting awakening turned marginally non-significant ( ß = −0.06, p = 0.07).
Intensity and perceived consequences of nightmares retained their significant association with psychotic experiences, but the effect of resulting awakening turned marginally non-significant ( ß = −0.06, p = 0.07).
We initially found no significant QTL for scleral ossification when treated as a continuous trait, although we did find two marginally non-significant QTL at the significance threshold P < 0.07 ( Fig 4A ).
= 3, p = 0.045) and a marginally non-significant variation in the GALT total score (Kruskal-Wallis test, χ 2 = 7.06, d.f. = 3, p = 0.07), whereas the GALT total area did not significantly vary among treatment groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, χ 2 = 4.6, d.f. = 3, p = 0.21) ( Fig. 4 A).
The effect of scale fragmentation on growth rate was negative, but marginally non-significant (p = 0.07; Table 2 ).
There was also a marginally non-significant, negative additive genetic covariance between ELF and the slope term for offspring birth weight ( Χ 1 2 =3.54; p =0.07; table 1 a ).
cancellata (p = 0.867), and a marginally non-significant trend was found for T. decipiens (p = 0.0709) ( Fig. 4 ). 3.5.
Time of use retained a negative association with self-esteem but was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.071), while age and gender did not emerge as statistically significant predictors.
Placebo) were observed at Weeks 26 (P = 0.016) and 52 (P = 0.041), as well as marginally non-significant differences at Weeks 13 (P = 0.071) and 39 (P = 0.064).
10%) but the difference was marginally non-significant (OR = 2.30, 95%CI: 0.91-5.81, p = 0.071).
Female genotype was marginally non-significant (Dev 2, 176 = 2.26, P = 0.071), with a trend for w 1118 females to fight for less time than Canton-S or Dahomey females.
patients was only marginally non-significant (χ 2 = 3.264, df = 1, P = 0.071).
The latter interaction was due to two marginally non-significant ( P = 0.071–0.072) effects: a decrease in the probability of zygodactyly for small object sizes relative to large when grasping fish compared to the “other substrate” reference condition of perching, and an increase in the probability of zygodactyly for medium object sizes relative to large, when perched in trees compared to “other substrates.” However, because these parameters were not significant, we felt justified in excluding the object size × contact condition within grasping scenario interaction effect in subsequent analyses (below).
The same observation applied for HIV DNA level with the higher level being associated with marginally non-significant faster CD4 increases after the 3rd month of cART (difference between those with HIV DNA above vs. below median 1.2 cells/μL/month; 95% CI: −0.1, 2.6; p = 0.071) ( Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S3 ).
A marginally non-significant result was seen between FS levels and student status ( p = 0.071), with only seniors showing a statistically significant coefficient ( p = 0.023).
Mortality in esfenvalerate-treated dishes averaged greater than 90% and mortality in pyrethrins-treated dishes averaged 60%, but this difference was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.071).
Furthermore, the marginally non-significant main effect for group ( P = 0.071) supports a trend for a moderately better sleep quality in the judo group (good sleep) compared with ball games (altered sleep) across the whole study period, but with a relatively low effect size.
For social loneliness, the interaction was marginally non-significant (F(4, 3975) = 2.16, p = .071), but post hoc comparisons revealed a clear gradient: All pairwise limitation comparisons were significant in the middle-aged group ( p s < 0.007), two of three were significant in the 66–79 group, and none reached significance in the 80 + group.
There was a marginally non-significant overall difference between ethnic groups (P = 0.071), and none of the multiple comparisons achieved significance (P > 0.05).
While this difference between the coding and non-coding regions is marginally non-significant based on a Fisher's exact test ( P = 0.071), a phylogeny-based resampling test showed that coding-region tree lengths always were considerably greater than any of the tree lengths derived from non-coding regions, under both MP and maximum likelihood (ML) criteria (thus, substitution rates in coding regions exceed those in non-coding regions at P <0.001).
Multiple linear regression revealed diabetes mellitus as a significant negative predictor of RMP-VFI ( β = −24.6, 95% CI: −44.47, −4.75; p = 0.017), with spared V5 showing a positive but marginally non-significant association ( β = 17.5, 95% CI: −1.61, 36.66; p = 0.071).
(d) Population growth Differences in rates of intrinsic increase between Daphnia from invaded and uninvaded lakes from the common garden data were marginally non-significant ( F 1,8 = 4.36, p = 0.071); Daphnia from invaded lakes exhibited an r that was 10% greater than Daphnia from uninvaded lakes ( figure 3 ).
In particular, while parasite density displayed a marginally non-significant increase with age in patients harboring the triple infection K1 + MAD20 + RO33 (P = 0.072), density decreased with age in patients infected with all other combinations.
The incidence of complications was higher in the B group (50%), compared to the other ABO (31.2%) with a marginally non-significant difference ( p = 0.072).
2 ), although the difference between the old urban population (Warszawa) and one of the rural populations (Żeromin) was only marginally non-significant (lower heterozygosity in Warszawa; β = −0.070 ± 0.039, P = 0.072, Table 1 ).
Finally, mean intake of the six antioxidant micronutrients, from which the DAI was calculated, did not vary between groups; however, mean intakes for vitamin A and vitamin C were only marginally non-significant ( p = 0.072 and p = 0.069, respectively).