“marginally nonsignificant”

There was a marginally nonsignificant effect and the trend showed that participants performed slightly better in the broad-focus condition (77.66% ± 0.02%) than they did in the split-focus condition (72.75% ± 0.02%; t (26) = 2.03, p BH = 0.13, Cohen’s d = 0.39, BF = 1.19).

However, the p value (.053) was slightly above the conventional significance threshold ( p < .05), indicating that the result was marginally nonsignificant.

For cryptoxanthin in men, the results were similar to the imputation models, although the p -trend was marginally nonsignificant in model 2 (as shown in Supplementary Table 4 ).

However, after adjustment, this association became marginally nonsignificant.

Among females, sustained remission was significantly associated with a lower risk of incident CVD in the unadjusted model (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37–0.90) and remained protective though marginally nonsignificant after adjusting for confounders (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.38–1.08).

At 32 °C ( F 2,193 = 6.837, p = 0.001, estimate: −0.080 ± 0.105), females also had a lower lifetime reproductive success under “harassment and mating” than under “no harm,” and under “harassment” and “no harm” (but the later result was marginally nonsignificant; Table 1 ).

S1 ; χ 2 = 1.5, P = 0.219), but somewhat of an effect (marginally nonsignificant) of time on missing proportions of polymorphic sites ( Fig.

Although the overall ANOVA was marginally nonsignificant, we conducted planned post hoc comparisons, given the exploratory nature of this study.

However, in Model 4, the relationship between average distance to water bodies and wing span was identified as positive and marginally nonsignificant (Table 2 ; Table S11 ).

Although the FW6 × FW7 interaction effect was marginally nonsignificant in the S 1 family analysis (Pr > F = 0.11), the pattern observed among the two‐locus genotypic means substantiated the strength and nature of the epistatic interaction between FW6 and FW7 (Table 2 ; Figure 4 ).

Delaying the start of follow‐up by 2 years led to a similar risk estimate, although the association became marginally nonsignificant in the setting of fewer incident events.

Overall, the varying grace periods produced consistent results with the primary analysis and showed a marginally nonsignificant association but with reduced precision.

A more pronounced nonlinear association was observed for PhenoAge acceleration, which was marginally nonsignificant in its overall association ( p overall = 0.0762) but exhibited a highly significant nonlinear trend ( p nonlinear = 0.0026).

The Wald F‐test from the LMM returned a marginally nonsignificant outcome, reflecting uncertainty regarding the presence of a clear effect (Table 1 , Figure 2 ).

For females, the trend was inconsistent: a nonsignificant decline from 1999–2003 (APC:–7.69%; 95% CI: –16.37 to 1.90), followed by a nonsignificant rise between 2003–2006 (APC: +18.90%; 95% CI: –16.74 to 69.80), and a marginally nonsignificant declining trend from 2006–2020 (APC:–1.21%; 95% CI: –2.52 to 0.12).

The strongest trend was found for university degree level ( B = 0.708, p = 0.054) and personal exposure to diabetes ( B = 0.203, p = 0.072), both marginally nonsignificant.

Women reported being more afraid to visit a doctor than men were (χ 2 (3) = 7.593, p = 0.055), although the result was marginally nonsignificant.

Naïve T cells showed a positive, albeit marginally nonsignificant, correlated with B cells, (R = 0.34, FDR = 0.063), consistent with findings from Peng et al., where TCF7 + naïve T cells localized in and around tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) composed of CD20 + B cells 26 .

In the WHI randomized trial involving postmenopausal women with hysterectomy, use of CEE for a median of 5.9 years was associated with a marginally nonsignificant 23% reduction in invasive BC incidence compared with placebo ( 10 ).

In girls, the annual increase was substantially higher at 0.58% (95% CI = 0.07-1.10; intercept = −1170.62; standard error = 0.263; R 2 = 0.479; p = .058), reflecting a more pronounced, albeit marginally nonsignificant, upward trajectory.

Although year of publication (β = 0.0092, p = 0.0573, R2 = 4.25) and working year (β = 0.0085, p = 0.0540, R2 = 4.45) showed positive trends, their effects were marginally nonsignificant.

[ 33 – 35 ] Notably, the association between exposure to mind–body integrative care and APOs was attenuated after further adjustment for sleep quality and psychological variables in the fully adjusted Cox model, resulting in a marginally nonsignificant HR.

Though marginally nonsignificant, there was a trend in which clonal rates increased over the sampling dates while their selfing rates remained unchanged.

In our study, although aridity index was a marginally nonsignificant predictor of leaf dissection, population‐level differences (included as a random term in our models) explained more variance in this aspect of leaf morphology than the fixed effect of site aridity.

These are (1) the partial correlation between political attitude and OSD is now marginally nonsignificant when permitting Hype as a covariable ( Table 2 , lower panel) (it remains marginally significant when Hype is removed as a covariable, Table 3 , lower panel).