Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

swered 0–1 of the Mechanistic Assessment questions correctly; when the High-Mechanistic group included participants who were in the original High-Mechanistic condition and answered both Mechanistic Assessment questions correctly, while the Low-Mechanistic group included all other participants; and (marginally significant) when the High-Mechanistic group included participants who were in the original High-Mechanistic condition and answered at least one Mechanistic Assessment question correctly, while the Low-Mechanistic group included all participants originally in the Low-Mechanistic condition.
Analyses revealed that the indirect effect of sleep problems at T1 and changes in depressive symptoms through APC in right CGC FA was moderated by ELA (index of moderated mediation = −0.022, SE=0.014, 95% CI: [−0.058, −0.005]; 98.75% CI: [−0.0723, −0.011]), such that the mediation model was marginally significant (i.e., did not survive correction for multiple comparisons) for adolescents with lower levels (−1 SD) of ELA (indirect effect = 0.15, SE=0.11, 95% CI: [0.011, 0.423]; 98.75% CI: [−0.0196, 0.5219]), but not with higher levels (+1 SD) of ELA (indirect effect = −0.066, SE=0.084, 95% CI: [−0.26, 0.67]; 98.75% CI: [−0.369, 0.122]).
The results of the subgroup analysis were marginally significant (Figs. 4 , 9 ); however, meta-regression analysis indicated that different AKI definitions were not the covariate contributing significantly to heterogeneity on the risk estimate for AKI incidence [coefficient −0.39 (−1.15 to 0.38); p = 0.56].
After Holm-Bonferroni corrections, the time × group interaction effects on SDMT and d’-CPT were marginally significant (corrected p values: 0.069, 0.096, respectively). 3.3 Intervention effects on the serum IL-6 level For the serum IL-6 level, the LMM analysis showed that the main effects of group (t (72.48) = 0.21, p = 0.84) and time (t (46) = 1.52, p = 0.14) were not significant.