“marginally significant”

At a group level, there was a marginally significant difference between the mean horizontal positions for left vs right cues ( t = 2.15, p < 0.05), but the overall evidence was not compelling ( l o g 10 B F 10 = 0.19).

This difference in frequency was marginally significant ( P = 0.05, Chi square test).

When the multiple models were analyzed by age group, low serum creatinine levels were significantly correlated with knee OA in all age groups in men (marginally significant in the 60–69 years age group) but only in the age group of <70 years in women (Bonferroni-corrected p <0.05).

The association between processing speed decline and the increase in somatic symptoms remained statistically significant in the fully adjusted models, whereas the effect of baseline delayed recall scores on changes in depressed affect was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Prospective Caloric intake was marginally significant in predicting changes in BMI indicating that higher caloric intake at baseline is predictive of decreases in BMI over time ( p = .05).

Tajima's D-test was marginally significant for this gene (0.1 < P -value < 0.05).

The association between the genotype TT and the increased cancer risk was marginally significant in Caucasians and in female subjects: OR = 3.35 [95% CI (1.01, 11.11)], P = 0.05, P heterogeneity = 0.01, and OR = 3.88 [95% CI (0.94, 16.01)], P = 0.06, P heterogeneity = 0.01, respectively (Table 1 , Figure 2 , 3 ).

Poisson GLMMs with added zero-inflation parameters displayed group and time interaction as marginally significant (χ 2 (2) = 5.97, p = 0.05), showing some difference among groups in performance-change over time.

Only the IV PCA–opioid use was found to be a marginally significant preventive factor for early postoperative severe pain in the PACU ( p =0.05; OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.24–1.00).

Inter-group difference in ΔCs for the normal and suspected R-HDL was marginally significant (1.75 ± 0.72 m/s versus 1.83 ± 0.75 m/s, p = 0.05) while an insignificant difference was observed for the normal and suspected L-WC (1.78 ± 0.74 m/s versus 1.85 ± 0.75 m/s, p = 0.20).

However, corrected post-hoc comparisons showed only a marginally significant difference between pet and WSC dogs (z = 2.55, p = 0.05; Table S12 Supplementary Material ).

In this analysis, the association between awareness of sports facilities and task performance became marginally significant ( P = 0.05), and we no longer found that use of healthy menus was more strongly related to contextual than to task performance ( P = 0.11).

Health in medical care (Panel E) exhibits marginally significant positive impact (PcPatap: β = 1.349, p < 0.05, PcPatau: β = 0.810, p < 0.10), implying that healthcare infrastructure and accessibility are fundamental to urban innovation.

The observed inequality in HIV transmission was also marginally significant at p = 0.05.

However, no significant interactions were identified for HCRU and cost outcomes, except for a marginally significant interaction with all-cause hospitalizations ( P = 0.050; data not shown).

Follow‐up independent‐samples t tests showed that, compared to the TD group, there was a marginally significant decrease in amplitude for the ASD group at the posterior ROI, t (49) = −1.97, p = 0.05; d = 0.56, and a significant increase in amplitude at the frontal ROI, t (49) = 4.05, p < 0.001; d = 1.14; no group difference was present at the central ROI, t (49) = −1.66, p = 0.10; d = 0.47.

There was also a marginally significant negative ( p = .05) relationship between drought tolerance of genotypes and wetness index in their location (Figure 4b ), being defined by: Tolerance = 0.99–0.214 (wetness index), R 2 = 0.05 and SE = 0.106.

Exercising 1–2 times per week was also marginally significant ( p = 0.05); therefore, exercise might reduce Pb accumulation in infertile women (aOR = 0.37, 95 % CI 0.14–1.00).

However, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures showed only a marginally significant effect of Time (p = 0.05), but no Time*Treatment interaction (p = 0.19).

In contrast, children with high compliance demonstrated greater autonomy and independence from their families than those with low (marginally significant) and delayed low compliance ( p < 0.05).

Risk perception was negatively correlated with age at sexual debut, r (64) = −0.26, p = 0.037; one-way ANOVA showed a marginally significant association between risk perception and number of sexual partners, F (4, 60) = 2.48, p = 0.05.

The marginally significant association between professional rank and resilience ( β = 0.115, P = 0.05) should be interpreted cautiously.

Comparing bias scores across groups (see Table 4 ), analyses indicated a significant main effect of valence ( F (2,123) = 6.64, p = .0018) and group ( F (1,124) = 5.78, p = .0177) with patients showing greater bias scores than controls with a marginally significant valence by group interaction ( F (2,123) = 3.08, p = .05).

Ratings were higher for frequencies 14 and 16 kHz for the NH subgroup ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant for the 12.5 kHz ( p = 0.05).

Specifically, C2 had a marginally significant difference from C3 ( p < 0.05), and C2 scored lower than C3 in this dimension.