“marginally significant”

A true underlying effect is present when highly significant findings (p=0·01) are more likely than marginally significant findings (p=0·049). 34 Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted for each outcome variable to compare effect size estimates from adjusted versus unadjusted models.

To be conservative, eight mutations that showed a marginally significant association with expression ( G -test: 0.001 < p < 0.01) as well as 15 mutations associated with expression only because of genetic linkage were excluded from further analyses.

We found a distinct and marginally significant difference in the distribution patterns of these genotypes between the cancer and non-cancer groups ( p = 0.01).

Patient gender had highly significant effects on patients’ satisfaction regarding health benefits and patient-centered care ( p < 0.01 for both) and a marginally significant impact on patients’ satisfaction with telemedicine monetary costs ( p = 0.06).

In the case of results on the Commentary Test and Emotional Prosody Test, group differences were at the level of marginally significant ( p < 0.01).

Furthermore, the result of Egger’s test also revealed a marginally significant publication bias (p < 0.01) (Table 4 ).

It is evident that the STRF differences faded within 0.8 s of the target interval, though remaining marginally significant (paired t -test: P <0.010, n =151); they completely disappeared during the second passive session (paired t -test: P <0.520, n =151).

For total reading times, a repeated measures 2 × 2 ANOVA with SENTENCE TYPE and BREAK LOCATION showed a significant (or marginally significant) effect of SENTENCE TYPE [ F 1(1, 47) = 8.44, p < 0.01, F 2(1, 15) = 3.02, p = 0.10].

The main effect of genotype was marginally significant only for logical memory [F(1,846) = 6.64, P = 0.010].

Unexpectedly, the relationship was also positive with nitrogen use, albeit not statistically significant (except for Nodularia , which was marginally significant; slope = 0.36; P = 0.01, n = 2162; Table 2 ).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P ≤.05 (marginally significant at P ≤.1, highly significant at P ≤.01, and extremely significant at P <.001). 18 In addition, a post hoc power analysis was carried out to examine the power of the bond strength data using G*Power 3.1.7 software.

Although there was a marginally significant difference in the odds of having mild DTM compared to absent DTM ( p = 0.01), none of the AUDIT categories demonstrated a statistically significant effect on DTM severity.

In fact, Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; see methods) using the reactome "Unfolded Protein Response (UPR)" gene set was marginally significant at 24 h (FDR < 25%) and highly significant at 21d (adjusted p < 0.01) (Additional file 3 ).

Vitamin A was associated with a marginally significant reduction of 2.39 days (p = 0.01, 95% CI: 4.19-0.47), while zinc supplementation yielded a more pronounced effect, averaging a 3.17-day reduction (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 5.19-1.31).

The PGS based on our generated summary statistics was able to predict a small but marginally significant ( P = 0.01) fraction of the variance in a test of arithmetic achievement.

Analysis for variance The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results shown in Table 2 reveal that the environment by genotype interaction effect is either highly significant (p-value <0.01) or significant (0.01 < p-value <0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 < p-value <0.1) on all 12 traits, indicating environmental variations among the tested varieties for yield and yield-related traits.

There were no significant differences between RP and HC participants at these three electrode sites ( p -value > 0.01), but there was a marginally significant difference between NR and HC ( p -value << 0.01), where aHC exhibited a higher PEIMF2 index as compared to NR.

Furthermore, when comparing body length, the significant differences in six pairs disappeared after preservation; a marginally significant difference ( p < 0.05) in one pair increased to a markedly significant difference ( p < 0.01); and differences in three pairs increased from being markedly significant to highly significant ( p < 0.001).

P-values were calculated and statistical significance reported as highly significant (***) if p≤0.01, significant (**) if p≤0.05, and marginally significant (*) if p≤0.1.

Self-confidence remained marginally significant ( β = 0.11, p = 0.01), suggesting a slight reduction in its effect after introducing motivational factors.

Moreover, the main effect of the informational factor was marginally significant [ F 1(1, 63) = 7.62, p < 0.01; F 2(1, 11) = 3.64, p = 0.08], with given-new sentences processed more accurately than new-given sentences.

Limited by the low number of modules, the probability ρ( k ) of a module interacting with k others showed a marginally significant fit to a power law: ρ( k )∼ k −0.77 ( P =0.010, see Figure 5A ).

A marginally significant difference was considered at 0.05 ≤ P ≤ 0.10, a statistically significant difference was considered at P < 0.05, a highly significant difference at P < 0.01, and an extremely significant difference at P < 0.001. 3.

When we compared the module eigengene values between clinical groups we found that two modules, Mod5 (green) and Mod7 (black), were marginally significant (T-test; unadjusted P-value < 0.01) and suggestive (T-test; unadjusted P-value < 0.05) respectively with one-year relapse free survival (RFS) (Fig. 1 c).

the mouth) group and Accuracy (Spearman r = 0.21, p <0.05), and a marginally significant correlation between the eyes group and Sensitivity ( r = 0.30, p <0.01).