“marginally significant”

PPD at 2 months was also positively associated with the report of disrespect during childbirth 3 days after childbirth, although this association was marginally significant (R 2 = 0.04, F(1,117) = 6.28, p = 0.01 and β = 3.36, p = 0.096) (Table 2 ).

A p value <0.05 was considered marginally significant, and a p value <0.01 was considered significant.

Although a continuous form of social network embeddedness was marginally significant at thresholds of p < 0.01 and p < 0.005, strong component-level associations were mainly identified from ROI-pairs between right frontal and occipital lobes.

Patient gender had highly significant effects on patients’ satisfaction regarding health benefits and patient-centered care ( p < 0.01 for both) and a marginally significant impact on patients’ satisfaction with telemedicine monetary costs ( p = 0.06).

Where sufficiently comparable data were available, a multilevel random-effects, meta-analysis of data from eleven differentstudies showed a marginally significant increase in Shannon diversity of patients with sporadic miscarriage (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI [0.05, 0.39], p = 0.010) with substantial heterogeneity (Q(12) = 41.29, p < 0.001, driven primarily by between study differences) (Supplementary Figs. 7 , 9 ).

For Syphacia (which lacks chromosome terminal overmerging) 9 out of 17 gene sets differed significantly from genome‐wide expectations (Supporting Information S9 ), the carbohydrate metabolism and cell signalling sets being marginally significant ( p ~ 0.01).

The PGS based on our generated summary statistics was able to predict a small but marginally significant ( P = 0.01) fraction of the variance in a test of arithmetic achievement.

The ANOVA testing for differences in the magnitude of these effects was marginally significant ( F (2,22) = 5.187, p = .01), with post-hoc tests indicating that subjects reported equivalent responses to AMP and ALC, but liked both drugs more than THC (see Fig 3 and S1 Table ).

The level of shading of the dot indicates the statistical significance for support of the QTL: * P < 0.001 or reported as highly significant; * 0.001 < P < 0.01 or reported as significant; and * 0.01 < P < 0.05 or reported as marginally significant. statistically significant in some sense.

Given that a marginally significant difference occurred in the overall reaction times among the groups (F (2,256) = 7.79, p < 0.01, the RTs of the open-skill, closed-skill, and control groups were 618 ms, 638 ms, and 664 ms, respectively), the efficiency of the three attentional networks was divided by the overall RT of each participant.

At 2-month follow-up, the tACS treatment group did show a marginally significant decrease in AHRS with an effect size of 0.450 ( p < 0.01, 95% upper bound = 0.10) comparable to our previous study 49 .

In the United States, Gunn and Lester [ 18 ] reported marginally significant positive associations between suicide rates and search volumes for the terms “commit suicide” ( p = 0.01) and “how to suicide” ( p = 0.07).

Among those significant eQTL SNP-feature pairs that were well-imputed, polymorphic and expressed in the replication dataset (~84% of pairs, ~95% of eFeatures, see Methods , Figure S6 ), >94% had consistent directionality in the two datasets, between 75.7% (eTxns) and 81.5% (eJxns) were directionally consistent and marginally significant (at p < 0.01), and just over half (52.1%−57.0%) were directionally consistent and FDR-corrected significant (published set, p<10 −5 ).

The main effect of genotype was marginally significant only for logical memory [F(1,846) = 6.64, P = 0.010].

In general, the main effects were strong and significant, while the two‐way interactions were marginally significant ( p > .01).

The increase in use of drawings was marginally significant, with use changing from five students to 17 ( p = 0.010).

Findings also suggest a marginally significant relationship between identifying as having a “Other” political affiliation (b = 0.176, p ≤ 0.010) and greater support for gun control, compared to identifying as a Republican.

Although the finding was marginally significant at the p < .01 level ( p = .0102), Hispanics with an immediate family member with cancer had higher odds of having been diagnosed with cancer.

Correlations between FA, AD and RD values, and SLC6A4 DNA methylation status A significant inverse correlation between the FA values of the body of the corpus callosum and SLC6A4 DNA methylation at CpG3 was observed for patients with MDD (Pearson's correlation: r =−0.493, P =0.003; Table 4 and Figure 3 ), in conjunction with a marginally significant inverse correlation at CpG4 (Pearson's correlation: r =−0.438, P =0.01; Table 4 ).

P-values were calculated and statistical significance reported as highly significant (***) if p≤0.01, significant (**) if p≤0.05, and marginally significant (*) if p≤0.1.

Analysis for variance The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results shown in Table 2 reveal that the environment by genotype interaction effect is either highly significant (p-value <0.01) or significant (0.01 < p-value <0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 < p-value <0.1) on all 12 traits, indicating environmental variations among the tested varieties for yield and yield-related traits.

Understanding ( t = −1.72, p = 0.079, d = −0.15) and protective functions ( t = 1.52, p = 0.065, d = 0.17) were marginally significant ( p < 0.01), and female volunteers only revealed higher scores in the understanding function ( M Female = 5.86, SD Female = 1.03; M Male = 5.70, SD Male = 0.98; protective: M Female = 3.57, SD Female = 1.57; M Male = 3.83, SD Male = 1.57). 4.

To be conservative, eight mutations that showed a marginally significant association with expression ( G -test: 0.001 < p < 0.01) as well as 15 mutations associated with expression only because of genetic linkage were excluded from further analyses.

Among high-quality IS specimens, there were no statistically significant differences in organism density in the IS specimens from cases with radiographic pneumonia compared with nonpneumonia cases, with the exception of a marginally significant difference for cytomegalovirus (median Ct, 27.9 vs 28.5; P = .01) ( Figure 2 ).

the mouth) group and Accuracy (Spearman r = 0.21, p <0.05), and a marginally significant correlation between the eyes group and Sensitivity ( r = 0.30, p <0.01).