“marginally significant”

However, marginally significant interactions among sociality, valence and SAS/SDS were also found (sociality × valence × SAS, F (1,43) = 3.998, P = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.085; sociality × valence × SDS, F (1,43) = 3.821, P = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.082), which violated the assumption of ANCOVA that covariates should not influence the effect of interest ( Miller and Chapman, 2001 ).

Besides, the T2 type by group interaction reached a marginally significant level ( F (1, 44) = 3.978, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.083).

The average initial fixation position was closer to the beginning of the word and further from the word center, although this result was marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

The backward priming effect was qualified by a marginally significant Backward SOA×Backward Congruency interaction, F (1,58) = 3.94, p = .052, η p = . 06.

pNGAL was marginally significant (p = 0.052) and uCyC was not significant (p = 0.76) after they were added to the parsimonious clinical model.

Examination of simple effects ( Table 5 ) revealed that for the self-esteem and empathy variables, there was a statistically significant increase in the means from pre-test to post-test in the intervention group ( p < 0.001), and a marginally significant change in the control group ( p = 0.052 and 0.058, respectively).

Land use types and life strategies The LMM analysis of the whole data set (NES full model) revealed a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.052) of land use type on the NES of communities, and, after removing non-significant interactions significantly higher shifts in managed grasslands compared to forests (Table 1 a − c).

An ANOVA revealed that the number of place intrusion errors committed between groups was marginally significant on Day 1, F (1,68) = 3.92, P = 0.052, η 2 = 0.05 (Young M = 0.05 SD = 0.22; Old M = 0.20 SD = 0.41) and reached significance on Day 2, F (1,68) = 4.59, P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.06 (Young M = 0.03, SD = 0.16; Old M = 0.20 SD = 0.48).

Living in a rural/small town (reference: urban) was marginally significant (ß = −0.872, 95% CI = −1.750 to 0.006, p = 0.052), and the impact of religious affiliation, specifically belonging to other religions (reference: none/agnostic/atheist), remained close to significance (ß = 3.388, 95% CI = −0.120 to 6.897, p = 0.058).

1 C), while larger adipocytes (110–150 μm) show marginally significant difference in the density distribution (Fig. 1D , p -value = 0.052) and average maximal axis value ( p -value = 0.043; lipoma = 123.94 ± 0.28 μm; SAT = 124.79 ± 0.32 μm).

There were marginally significant differences across the four groups, χ 2 (3, N = 114) = 7.73, p=.052.

Mediation analysis revealed that uric acid (mediation effect = −0.003, p<0.001) and GGT (mediation effect = −0.004, p = 0.004) had significant mediation effects, while the mediating effect of serum albumin was marginally significant (p = 0.052) ( Figure 3B ).

The correlation coefficient indicates a slightly negative, marginally significant correlation (r = -0.35, p = 0.052).

For the total difficulties score, this gender difference was marginally significant ( b = -0.75 [95 % CI: -1.51; 0.01], p = 0.052).

When examining decision distance there were no effects of Stress but ( p s > .19) but a marginally significant main effect of Uncertainty, F (1, 60) = 3.28, p = .052, η p 2 = .075, and a Stress by Uncertainty interaction, F (1, 60) = 5.67, p = .020, η p 2 = .086.

A comparison of geometrically correct choices between the real-world and VR environments was marginally significant (Z = 1.92, p = 0.052).

An analysis of MMN and LN enhancements measured 6 months later, at T2, yielded a marginally significant effect of condition in the MMN window ( F (2,32) = 3.23, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.168).

The advantage of the independent commission starts to become apparent at the Moderately Effective level, where it has marginally significant positive effect ( p = 0.052) with a coefficient of 1.736.

CF-MiPro is significantly correlated with decreased total CFU/mL (sum of aerobic and anaerobic CFU, then log 10 -transformed) for clinical samples from both subject genotypes, in a day-dependent manner for nonCF samples (day, P = 0.0014) and marginally significant in CF samples (day, P = 0.052).

The main effect for time was marginally significant, F (1,8) = 7.16, p < 0.052, ηp 2 = 0.47 (see Figure 1 ), revealing an increase in non-judgment in both intervention groups.

The SD of head tilt angle showed a marginally significant difference across conditions ( F (1.364, 19.093) = 3.903, p =.052, η p 2 = 0.536).

In this case, only item 32 showed a marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.12, p = 0.052) with the wish to speak with a psychologist about these issues, indicating that the higher the frequency of thinking about developing cancer, the higher the need to speak with a psychologist (see Table S2.33PSY5a in the Supplementary Material for more details).

The number of SP moments at 6 months was significantly associated with motor (estimate = 2.4; SE = 0.9; p = 0.007) and marginally significant with cognitive scores (estimate = 1.9; SE = 1.0; p = 0.052) at 18 months.

In the T2CTC dataset ( Figure 8 ), a baseline effect of Trop2 expression was found for the bone metastatic condition ( p = 0.04255), with a marginally significant difference in slope between those with bone metastasis and without ( p = 0.052).

Additionally, there were marginally significant excesses of heterozygosity present in the islands of Hawaii ( P = 0.052), Lanai ( P = 0.052), and Molokai ( P = 0.086).