Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The Rht1 haplotype effect on AR was significant in greenhouse experiments for groups RE-NIL1, CM and FRxRE and in fields experiments for RE-NIL1, CM and MI and marginally significant in the green house for MI ( p = 0.052) and in field tests for FRxRE ( p = 0.086).
marginally significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
found that the effect of vitamin C was not significant on left ventricular circumferential and longitudinal strain, which are measures of systolic function, whereas there was a marginally significant effect of vitamin C on the decrease in the post-peak exercise measurement of circumferential strain ( P = 0.052) ( 52 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Finally, we tested if the PWM predictions agreed with the allelic binding ratios in HepG2 ChIP-seq data and found a small but marginally significant correlation ( Figure 2f, r = 0.194, P = 0.052) for 101 SNPs tested in Yan et al . and reaching r = 0.235 ( P = 0.047) for a subset of 72 SNPs with significant PWM CIS-BP hits (motif P -value < 0.005), in contrast to almost zero correlation for ΔPWM Mult reported in Yan et al .
marginally significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Regarding place of residence, overall usage frequency showed a marginally significant difference ( χ 2 = 9.37, p = 0.052), and the number of tools used differed significantly ( χ 2 = 8.24, p = 0.016), with rural students using a more varied range of tools than urban students.
marginally significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
For the subgroup with low facilitation in the pre-change epoch (Figure 4 C) we observed a marginally significant main effect of configuration [ F (1, 5) = 6.41; p = 0.052] and a significant change by block interaction [ F (4, 20) = 3.95; p < 0.05], all other main effects and interactions (notably including the configuration by change interaction) were not significant (all p > 0.180).
marginally significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
When assessing group differences in power, there were marginally significant differences in low frequency power [ F (2, 49) = 3.14, p = 0.052] due to the controls exhibiting greater low frequency power compared to schizophrenia and autism, but this did not survive Bonferroni correction ( p = 0.110; p = 0.140, respectively).
Heart Rate Variability in Schizophrenia and Autism.
Front Psychiatry · 2021 · PMC8656307