The difference between 20 and 100 yen is marginally significant ( p = 0.054).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
This finding was marginally significant ( p = 0.054).
The factor time was marginally significant, F (1,40) = 2.81, P = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.07, pointing at habituation over time.
Additionally, there was a marginally significant increase in I-FABP levels in lean patients when compared to non-lean individuals ( p = 0.054, Figure 7 a).
Furthermore, a recent study ( Gaetz et al., 2014 ) identified significant reduction in the GABA MRS signal in the motor cortex of patients with ASD, and a marginally significant ( p = 0.054) positive correlation between the GABA signal and age.
The PN-only group also had a significant effect on viral suppression at 6 months (β = 0.610, OR = 1.85, p = 0.035) and a marginally significant effect on being in care at 6 months (β = 0.660, OR = 1.93, p = 0.054), compared to the TAU group.
Current MDD was not significantly related to response (ps > .128), and compared to the results from the primary analysis above, one marginally significant ( p = .054) result became significant ( p = .046 for the relation between homework days per week and response for those in CBT), and one significant result ( p = .049) became marginal ( p = .074 for the relation between homework compliance and response for those in KY).
2A ), and while there was no main effect of warming or duration, their interaction was marginally significant ( P = 0.054; all P -values presented in Table 1 ).
There was also a marginally significant association between HMI level and reported occupation of hunter vs occupation of “not-hunter” ( χ 2 p-value = 0.054, df = 2), ( Fig 2B ).
Younger children were more likely to be underweight; however, this association was marginally significant ( p = 0.054), suggesting a possible decline in prevalence with increasing age.
pylori but this difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.054).
There is, however, a marginally significant interaction between measurement points and SES clusters in the Satisfaction with Life Scale [ F (2, 182) = 2.97, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.032].
Multivariate regression analysis Including informing and task prompting in a multivariate regression analysis (see Table 4 ), resulted in an overall marginally significant multivariate model (p = 0.054).
With non-naive participants removed, the correlation between AOT scores and scratch card gambling frequency was attenuated and became marginally significant, r (153) = −.155, p = .054.
There was a marginally significant difference between the 4-g amount of food compared with the 2-g amount ( P = 0.054).
Younger age at the time of diagnosis, the other most important prognostic factor in MMD besides PCA stenosis, was marginally significant by univariate analysis ( p =0.054) and not significant by multivariate evaluation.
Of the 46 adults for whom sex can be determined, females constitute 65% while males constitute 35%, a marginally significant difference (binomial test p = 0.054).
The difference in reduction of posterior tumor margins was marginally significant ( P = 0.054), while the inferior tumor margin was not found to be statistically significant ( P = 0.167).
Marginally significant differences were found for CD68+ macrophages (low-grade vs. high-grade tumors: 1.94% [IQR: 0.65–5.16%] vs. 3.56% [IQR: 0.98–10.54%]; p = .054) and CD3 + T-cells (low-grade vs. high-grade tumors: 1.87% [0.62–5.15%]; p = .063).
bilateral Whole sample FAA and PAA A marginally significant Time × Group interactions was found when considering PAA values as the dependent variable (F(1,47) = 3.91, p = 0.054) with an increasing trend in the BS group, i.e., becoming more right-lateralized and a decreasing trend in the US group, i.e., becoming left-lateralized.
Support for Sociopolitically Inspired Solutions to the Organ Shortage A similar ANCOVA on support resulted in main effects of registration status, F (2, 1214) = 207.06, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.26; and sociopolitical viewpoint, F (2, 1214) = 7.49, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.01; as well as a marginally significant interaction between these two variables, F (4, 1214) = 2.34, p = 0.054, partial η 2 = 0.01.
In aMCI subjects, females but not APOE e4 allele carriers had significantly lower MOCA scores at baseline but there was a marginally significant (p = 0.054) relationship between carriers of the APOE e4 allele and higher rates of cognitive decline as measured by change in the MOCA.
Simultaneous with this increasing bundle compliance trend, there were a marginally significant decreasing trend of VAP rate (Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test of trend was 3.71, P = 0.054) and a significant decreasing trend of ventilator utilization (Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test of trend was 190.81, P < 0.001).
The ANOVA on inter-bout-interval data resulted in a marginally significant main effect of Day 5 Treatment ( F 1 , 24 = 4.01, p = 0.054; Supplementary Figure 3C ) but no other main effects or interactions ( F ’s < 1.94, p ’s > 0.05).
Using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the reduction in LOS for the MN intervention group was marginally significant (19.8 ± 3.0 days vs 11.2 ± 1.5 days, p=0.054).