“marginally significant”

Lastly, exploratory analysis revealed a marginally significant association between the accuracy covariate and the interaction effect in the SSR (t = 3.36, p = .025 FWE and Bonferroni corrected).

The MU activity at this site exhibited little selectivity for binocular disparity, although the tuning was marginally significant ( Figure 7 A; ANOVA, p = 0.025).

A significant two-way interaction was found between the hemisphere of activity (right, left) and hand observed (right, left) in the precentral gyrus ( F (1, 22) = 18.73, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.46; Bonferroni-corrected p value: p < 0.004); this same interaction was also marginally significant in the inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis after correcting for multiple comparisons ( F (1), 22 = 5.74, p = 0.025, partial η 2 = 0.21; Bonferroni-corrected p value: p = 0.1).

PCIs were the least accurately reported, with low and marginally significant correlations ( r = 0.21, p = 0.025) and very low reliability (ICC = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00–0.76).

Notably, moderate temperature and high humidity exhibited a marginally significant protective interaction ( β = − 0.039, 95% CI : − 0.072 to − 0.006, P = 0.025).

Advanced age was a marginally significant predictor of musculoskeletal discomfort in females ( p = 0.0254), but not in males ( p = 0.5748).

For the ANAM, only two subset scores showed marginally significant between-group differences from baseline to Week 6 (Simple Reaction Time Repeated throughput score P = 0.0256 and throughput standard score P = 0.0263).

However, we also observed a marginally significant difference in the first principal component between the strains with different foraging index ( Kruskal–Wallis test , P = 0.0259, see supplementary fig.

However, 3 of them remain significant or marginally significant, i.e., OSMR (p=0.026), TP63 (p=0.028) and CACHD1 (p=0.081), suggesting they carry additional prognostic power.

The total numbers of birds observed, regardless of location, were similar between the different treatments at age 34 weeks, but treatment differences increased with age; at age 70 weeks, the greatest number of birds were observed for PB and the least for R ( Figure 3 b) (marginally significant interaction age.time.treatment, Wald 12 /ndf = 1.94 by GLMM; p = 0.026).

1 The simple-effect of condition (Bonferroni corrected p = 0.025) revealed that novel stimuli (5.58 ± 3.30 μV) evoked larger amplitudes compared with familiar stimuli (2.68 ± 2.90 μV) in the high tendencies toward PIPU [ F (1, 26) = 57.74, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.69], but there was only a marginally significant difference in amplitude between stimuli (4.98 ± 3.51 vs. 3.71 ± 3.19 μV) for the low tendencies toward PIPU [ F (1, 24) = 5.62, p = 0.026, η 2 p = 0.19] groups (see Figure 2 ).

Adjusting for age, there was no effect of the pandemic on externalising (simple RR: 0.613, p<0.001; age-adjusted RR 0.936, p=0.452) and a small and marginally significant (taking into account multiple testing) effects on internalising (simple RR 0.920, p=0.026 and age-adjusted 1.307, p=0.040 respectively).

When focusing on the distribution of APOE isoforms within macroareas and a Chi-square test is performed, only the populations in the AFR macroarea provide a marginally significant result, with the Luhya (LWK) people highlighted as the only contribution towards significance (df = 2, p -value = 0.026), since this group presents a lower number of individuals with the ε2 and ε3 isoforms than what is expected, and a higher number of individuals with the ε4 isoform of APOE ( Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S3 ). 3.4.

For the olfactory condition the ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of interval [ F (5,60) = 2.76, p = 0.026, η 2 = 0.19].

The results showed two marginally significant relationships – T MN was positively associated with the emotional positivity factor (β = .206, p = .026) and the impulsivity factor (β = .196, p = .035).

The SES × GG and SES × AG interaction terms are statistically marginally significant ( p = .026) and statistically significant ( p = .024), respectively.

To confirm that these trends are representative of whole genome patterns, I also analyzed a larger set of 13,659 genes sequenced in both species (2,335 X-linked and 11,424 autosomal; see Materials and Methods for details), which produced the same non-significant results for d N (median d N = 0.0039 for X-linked genes and 0.0038 for autosomal genes; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.76) and marginally significant results for ω (median ω = 0.092 for X-linked genes and 0.086 for autosomal genes; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.026).

Investigation of the metabolic feature impact in HD risk resulted in marginally significant results (average p -value = 0.026; Supplemental Table 24).

A test for multivariate homogeneity of group variances uncovered marginally significant differences among the groups ( p = 0.026, Table 1A ), which could potentially indicate the involvement of additional explanatory factors that were not accounted for in the model.

There was no substantive evidence for an increase in survival probability with trial number after normal sleep (though with a marginally significant p value) (main effect, BF 10 = 1.3, p = 0.026, Figure 3 C), however strong evidence for a decrease in survival probability with trial number following sleep deprivation (interaction effect: BF 10 > 1000, p < 0.001, Figure 3 C).

The gaps remained there pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic, except for a marginally significant larger increase in high depressive symptomatology between Waves 9 and 10 among those not living alone (RR not_alone*wave10 = 1.22, 95 % CI: 1.02, 1.47; p = 0.026).

For instance, there was a marginally significant relationship between the total needs change score and age (r s =0.212, p =.026), indicating that younger participants were more likely to show improvements.

Medicaid patients had a marginally significant difference in use of bevacizumab (M = 19.9/100000 OE, SD = 7.32) and aflibercept 2 mg (16.1/100000 OE, SD = 7.22) [t(6)]=2.95, p = 0.026].

The change in particulate concentrations of mixture was marginally significant in almost all the sub-regions, except for Western Africa, which was statistically significant at p = 0.026, and Northern Africa, which was not significant ( p = 0.973).

There was also a marginally significant effect in V3A [bootstrap: p = 0.026, paired t -test: t (6) = 1.80, p = 0.061], but all other ROIs were far from significance (all p 's > 0.15).