“marginally significant”

A marginally significant interaction for Sex and MPS was found, F (1,58) = 3.71, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.06.

There was a significant difference between the subgroups on the hopelessness subscale of the CDI-S ( p = 0.02) and a marginally significant difference on the overall score on the SiC ( p = 0.06).

An exception is the results of the 400 ms time window with the +45° morphed target, which showed only a marginally significant difference (p < 0.06) between the same-orientation cue (+45°) and the plaid cue.

Further, our findings indicate that institutions with a RC network are marginally more likely to encourage or inform their RCs about national certification than those without a network (marginally significant at p =0.06).

When composite self‐blame was analyzed using beverage and alcohol beliefs as predictors, the overall model was marginally significant, F (2, 63) = 2.88, p = 0.06, MSE = 176.95, R 2 adjusted = 0.06.

Marginally significant differences were found between the female and male groups at baseline for inter- and intra-hemispheric gamma coherence [ t (35) = 1.97, 1.96, p = 0.06], but not for theta or alpha.

A chi-square test revealed a marginally significant association between hassle and behavioral orientation ( χ 2 = 5.63, df = 2, p = 0.06).

The three-way interaction of prime duration × prime congruence × group was marginally significant, F (1, 48) = 3.6, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.97.

Moreover, more positive aging attitudes on the three subscales were linked to higher quality of life at least on a marginally significant level (PL: Pearson r = −.15, p =.060; PC: Pearson r =.42, p <.001; PG: Pearson r =.34, p <.001).

Association between pathobiological markers of breast cancer including tumor size and Ki-67 and the relationship of these variables with DAI and age As shown in Table 5 , we found a positive and marginally significant relationship between tumor size and the Ki-67 marker (correlation coefficient = 0.14, p = 0.06).

The main effect of agent type was marginally significant, F (1, 232) = 3.58, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.015; specifically, participants rated it less permissible in the AI agent condition ( M = 48.49, SD = 2.05, 95% CI [44.45, 52.52]) than those in the human agent condition ( M = 53.93, SD = 2.02, 95% CI [49.96, 57.90]).

Both small (size< 3.2 cm) and large (size≥3.2 cm) tumor subgroups in our study showed decreased recurrence-free survival in high-lesion-contrast tumors (conspicuity score ≥ 2) compared with those of low lesion contrast (conspicuity score < 2)( p = 0.04), although the small tumor subgroup showed marginally significant results ( p = 0.06, Supplementary Figure 1 ).

Believing that FGM is important for social acceptance was also associated with higher odds of severity, although this finding was marginally significant (AOR = 3.54, p = 0.060).

As the moderation was significant for gathering in groups ( F (3, 1865) = 6.80, p = 0.0001) and marginally significant for non-essential travel ( F (3, 1857) = 2.37, p = 0.06), considering norms and civic duty together for these two behaviors explains more of the variation around rule-breaking than considering them separately.

A similar HLM for response latency yielded a main effect for consistency, b = 0.33 ( SE = 0.03), t (7268) = 9.89, and p < 0.0001, a marginally significant main effect of consensus, b = 0.005 ( SE = 0.002), t (133) = 1.90, and p = 0.060, and no interaction, t (7235) = 0.84 and p = 0.400.

The intercept was marginally significant ( β ± SE : 0.65 ± 0.35, P = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant interaction between ECE and left hippocampal volume (ß = −1096.7, t (13) = −2.0, p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant ( P = 0.06) shorter time since last drug use among those with a positive urine test [median 225 days (95% confidence limits 120, 365 days) vs 420 days (95% confidence limits 180, 730 days)].

Effects of TMS-induced Disruptions on Sensitivity ( d ′) In the lip experiment the effect of time on sensitivity ( d ′) was marginally significant ( F 2,34 = 3.04, P = 0.06; Table 3 , Fig. 5 A ).

During the intervention period, within the control cohort there was a marginally significant increase in the proportion of individuals with increased frailty (compared with the intervention group) (Fisher's test p<0.06; online supplementary figure 10C ).

Caregivers in this group also reported marginally significant improvements in household food security ( p = 0.06).

The ANOVA did not report a significant effect of the target-to-flankers relative distance ( F 2.34, 21.09 = 1.47, p = 0.251, partial-η 2 = 0.14, degrees of freedom and p value were corrected with the Greenhouse-Geisser correction because of sphericity violation), but reported a marginally significant effect of the configuration ( F 1,9 = 4.62, p = 0.06, partial-η 2 = 0.34).

The initial decrement of tumor size was a marginally significant positive predictor for PFS (P = 0.06). 20 The maximal benefit was also reported in patients with a better ECOG performance status. 6 Our clinical experience obtained a similar finding.

This was not true for INT concepts, where no differences between those conditions were found (agents: M = 3.01, SE = 0.22, non-agents: M = 2.54, SE = 0.23), even though a similar, but marginally significant trend was observed (p = .06).

Effects of Mindfulness Training on Cortisol The CAR measured over 3 workdays showed a marginally significant Group*Time interaction, controlling for baseline CAR, cohort, gender, years of policing, smoking status, and BMI [ χ 2 (2, N =13)=5.55, p =0.06, η 2 =0.04; Figure 3 ; Table 2 ].