“marginally significant”

Moreover, according to the Delong test, the differences of AUCs between the clinicoradiological and combined models were marginally significant for the AUCs at 2 years (P=0.06), 3 years (P=0.05), and 5 years (P=0.07) ( Table S4 ).

There was a statistically significant unadjusted gene-by-gene interaction (β unadj = 0.37, p = 0.02) between the HFE and TF genotypes and, when adjusted for maternal blood lead level at delivery and child’s concurrent anemia status, this interaction term was marginally significant (β adj = 0.31, p = 0.06) (data not shown).

Additionally, a trend towards lower birth weight was noted in the FAM group, although the disparity was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

Age was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) as an effect modifier when all cohorts are included in the pooled analysis; the association is much weaker when analyses consider only those cohorts or pairs of cohorts that provide incidence data on both sexes ( p = 0.21).

The interaction between emotion and location was still marginally significant, F (2,13) = 3.141, p = 0.060.

The observed rates per 1000 discharges at risk differed significantly (P-value ≤ 0.05) for six of the eight PSIs, and was marginally significant for one of the eight (P-value = 0.06).

When we remove White 20, one of two birds with the fewest numbers ( N = 3) of HVC X recorded, all but one of the remaining birds considered individually had P values < 0.001 (16 birds), with the remaining one marginally significant ( P < 0.06), and with the group data yielding values of R = –0.75 and P < 10 −4 .

Chital spatial density was marginally significant (P = 0.06) with a very weak relation with lion density, while there was no relationship with spatial density of sambar, distance to water sources, or vegetation density ( S5 Fig ).

In contrast to the effects of scopolamine, MLA treatment caused a marginally significant interaction between ADDITIVITY and TIME ( F (3,18) = 2.97; p = 0.06; Figure 4C ).

While the presence of adenoma or carcinoma did not seem to affect the correlation between microbial PCo1 and metabolite PC1, females showed a higher microbial PCo1-metabolite PC1 correlation than males (Spearman’s ρ = −0.772, P < 10 −19 for females; Spearman’s ρ = −0.643, P < 10 −17 for males; difference was marginally significant when tested using Fisher r -to- z transformation, P < 0.06).

The results for females were marginally significant for all villages ( N =126, r =−0.14, Student’s t -test P =0.06) and inland villages ( N =29, r =−0.27, Student’s t -test P =0.08), but not for coastal villages ( N =97, r =−0.1, Student’s t -test P =0.14).

For the interaction of treatment and distances of 6m and 7m, there was a marginally significant effect (P<0.06), Table 2B .

The moderator variable, the interaction between prime and extraversion, was a marginally significant predictor of Risk-Taking in the GDT, F (3,69) = 2.54, p = 0.06.

In Irele, access to protected dug wells was marginally significant (AOR: 1.79, 95% CI: 0.96–3.21, p = 0.06), while in Ile-Oluji, access to river water emerged as a significant risk factor (AOR: 7.97, 95% CI: 1.81–58.58, p = 0.02).

Further demonstrating the utility of the initial dip as a biomarker for metabolic overdrive, neither group alone (nor as a single aggregated group) had significant correlations between the subsequent PVC positive response (~6 s post stimulus onset) and drift rate improvement ( Figure 5B ; though the correlation of the minority group was marginally significant cc = −0.62, P = 0.06).

A marginally significant interaction between CtDCS condition and emotion was indeed found ( F 4,56 = 2.47, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.15).

At the broad scale, a Mantel test showed a marginally significant non-random association between genetic and spatial distance (Monte Carlo test p < 0.06; 50 000 replications).

However, the correlation between M-CSF and the average size of CAMLs was marginally significant (SCC = 0.38; P = 0.06).

More patients with ≥5 foci underwent total mastectomy; this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The effect of age on frequency discrimination within the 410–550 Hz range was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), but age had no significant effect within the 550–750 Hz range ( p = 0.13).

A 2 (gender) × 3 (experimental conditions) ANOVA on the perceived importance of the socially related SDGs indicated a significant main effect of experimental conditions, F (2,293) = 4.72, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.08, a significant main effect of gender, F (1,293) = 23.95, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.08, and a marginally significant interactive effect of gender and experimental conditions, F (2,293) = 2.82, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.02.

Unlike the objective measures, in the case of the VAS of the operated hand and the mental domain of the SF‐12, there was a significant effect of treatment and no effect of carryover, however, this conclusion should be cautiously interpreted and needs further investigation, as the carryover effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.06 and P = 0.09 respectively).

Effects of the intervention on olfactory performance Linear mixed model (LMM) comparing the change in olfactory threshold as a result of the intervention between the two groups, controlling for age, revealed a marginally significant main effect of the intervention, F (1,318) = 3.4, p = 0.06, and a significant and robust main effect of group, F (1,318) = 199.8, p < 0.001, but no interaction of these two factors, F (1,318) = 0.02, p = 0.88, suggesting a small increase in olfactory sensitivity in both groups as a result of the intervention.

There was a marginally significant difference between average valence of the positive videos among the primed groups ( F 2,295 = 2.83, p = .06, ηp 2 = .02), where those in the positive group rated the videos as more negative while those in the negative group rated the videos as more positive.

In the multivariate ordinal regression model with ventilator-techniques as the dependent variable, Brazilian regions and type of hospital were significant, and being a certified specialist was marginally significant ( p = 0.060).