“marginally significant”

The effect of prime type was marginally significant for words, F (1.89,39.78) = 3.08, p = 0.060, but significant for pseudowords, F (1.80,37.85) = 7.14, p = 0.003.

There was a marginally significant treatment response observed for the K-10 ( F 1, 26 = 3.86, p = 0.060).

Group differences for self-reports on ADHD were marginally significant, with participants who played SC ( M = 12.33, SE = 0.74) reporting higher scores than those who played UT ( M = 10.24, SE = 0.76), t (33) = 1.98, p = 0.06, d = 0.67.

The overall effect of fuel-treatment was marginally significant ( F 2,30.77 = 3.09, P = 0.060; see Table S5 ).

IL-6 (but not CRP) was a marginally significant predictor ( P = 0.06) of GFDCAV at 5 years ( Table 3 ).

In the comparison between the footballers and control groups, the statistically significant differences were found in the following variables: in the BMI (Mann–Whitney = 512.5, p < 0.05), being higher in the footballer than in control condition with a moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.65 (r = 0.31); in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Global score) (Mann–Whitney = 492, p < 0.00), being higher in the footballer than in the control condition with a very high effect size, Cohen’s d = 2.3 (r = 0.75) and marginally significant in the Positive subscale (Mann-Whitney = 607, p = 0.06), being higher in the footballer than in control condition and there was a small to moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.48 (r = 0.23); and in the Subscale 1 of the CAP (Mann–Whitney = 547, p < 0.05), being higher in the footballer than in the control condition with a small to moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.52 (r = 0.25) ( Table 5 ).

For the 600–800 ms time window, a positive cluster over the left-frontal electrodes was marginally significant (cluster p = 0.06, electrodes Fp1, F7, F3, and FC5).

In middle-aged Japanese women without diabetes, association between AT-IR and obesity and prediabetes, although marginally significant (p=0.06), was confirmed as previously reported in adolescents, 12 15 middle-aged and elderly people with obesity. 10 13 14 16 AT-IR also showed positive associations with a broad range of cardiometabolic risk factors, including all diagnostic components of metabolic syndrome.

Simple slopes revealed that the slope of solitary TSD was significant for women in stable relationships ( B = 0.04, 95% CIs [0.01, 0.07], p = .02), but not for single women ( B = 0.02, 95% CIs [− 0.01, 0.06], p = .23), or men in a stable relationship ( B = 0.002, 95% CIs [− 0.04, 0.05], p = .92); effects were marginally significant for single men ( B = 0.05, 95% CIs [0.00, 0.10], p = .06; Fig. 3 a).

Marginally significant correlations were observed between apoM and pentraxin-3 ( r = 0.18, P = 0.06; Fig. 3d ).

Although a significant increase in the ‘G’ allele ( χ 2 =6.83, P = 0.00895, Power = 85.03%, OR = 2.6) was noticed in ALL patients, it was found to be marginally significant after correction for multiple testing (BH P = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant difference in circulating T between species ( F 1,21 =3.82, P =0.06) and a significant difference in circulating T across breeding stages ( F 1,21 =4.84, P =0.04).

Spatial ROIs We found a marginally significant interaction in a cluster in right PSPL/Pr, (peak coordinate: x = 20, y = -66, z = 54, BA = 7, z = 2.52, p = 0.06, k = 83 voxels; Figure 4A ) 7 .

In addition, the interaction between priming type and experiments reached significance, F (1,96) = 5.72, MSE = 20401, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.06, and the three-way interaction was marginally significant, F (3,96) = 2.53, MSE = 9013, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.07, whereas other interactions were missing [Experiment ∗ SOAs: F < 1, ns; Congruency ∗ SOAs: F (3,96) = 1.41, MSE = 12277, p > 0.10].

The effect of S1 on wrestling behavior was marginally significant (df = 10, t = 2.13, p = 0.06).

Significant differences were observed in age ( P = .018), work status ( P = .014), and comorbidity profile ( P = .007), and a marginally significant difference was observed in education ( P = .06).

In contrast, fading conditions produced significant negative partial-repetition costs in reaction times with rotating boxes for location × shape, t (15) = −2.41, p < 0.02, and marginally significant costs for location × response, t (15) = − 1.61, p = 0.06; no effects were reliable in the error data, p values > 0.3.

For fear, AOR was 0.45, which was marginally significant ( p = .06).

There was a significant interaction between sentence-effect compatibility and action-effect relation [ F (1, 38) = 8.04, MSE = 38.89, p = 0.007] and a marginally significant interaction between sentence-effect compatibility and SOA [ F (4, 152) = 2.67, MSE = 50.92, p = 0.06].

RESULTS Lp-PLA2 levels were higher among American men (301.7 ±82.6 ng/mL) than Japanese men (275.9 ±104.7 ng/mL); the difference was marginally significant (p=0.060, Table 1 ).

Serum 3α-diol content was also higher in males that were admitted to the ICU than in males that were not admitted and was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

A marginally significant relationship ( t (74) = − 1.9, p = .06) was found between gender and FoP indicating that women ( M = 27.2, SD = 7.9) tended to experience more FoP compared to men ( M = 23.4, SD = 6.7).

After adjusting for age in Cox regression analysis, the association between TOP2A deletion and time to recurrence remains strongly significant (p-value = 0.002) whereas the association with survival is marginally significant (p-value = 0.06).

The passage time of seeds through the gut and the germination percentage were marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.71, F = 7.69, p = 0.06).

High DBP seems to reduce the CV hazard to 0.61 (marginally significant effect at P =0.06).