Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Results and Discussion An analysis of variance (ANOVA) on word/non-word (W+ versus W-) and phonological similarity to Chinese (C+ versus C-) revealed a marginally significant effect of word ( M w+ = 5.74, SD = 1.60, and M w - = 5.15, SD = 1.91); F (1,35) = 3.70, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.10; a significant effect of phonological similarity ( M c+ = 6.28, SD = 1.53 and M c - = 4.61, SD = 1.64), F (1,35) = 59.32, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.63; and a significant word by phonological similarity interaction, F (1,35) = 7.18, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.17.
Biofunctional Understanding and Judgment of Size.
Front Psychol · 2016 · PMC4805645
marginally significantp=0.061.2× alphagold
The final eradication rate was 80.0% (n=90) for the period before the test introduction, and 88.9% (n=144) for the period after it; the difference was marginally significant (χ 2 =3.52, p=0.06), which was similar to a previous result (p=0.08). 2 ) The eradication rate was 100% (n=53) among those with CYP2C19 *1*1 treated by the second-line regimen ( Table 3 ).
marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
The correlation of mean HA-HH ΔadjRT with FA in the subgenual cingulum ( n = 34) was significantly different from the correlation with FA in the parahippocampal cingulum ( z = −2.68, ΔFisher zs = −0.63, SE = 0.24, P < 0.01, 1-tailed) as well as the retrosplenial cingulum ( z = −1.58, ΔFisher zs = −0.32, SE = 0.20, P = 0.06, 1-tailed, marginally significant).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Indeed, the slope of the association between global affect reactivity and milk cortisone for the women with the highest quartile of mental health symptoms was not significant ( p = 0.46), while the slope of the women with the lowest quartile of mental health symptoms was marginally significant ( p = 0.06). 3.2.3 Exploratory Analyses Exploratory analyses demonstrated that participants in the stressor group had a significantly higher CC‐ratio compared to the control group (Figure 4 and Table S2 ).
marginally significantP =0.061.2× alphagold
Comparison of the ROC curves revealed no significant difference in the clinical values of ChE and CRP ( P =0.93) or those of cholinesterase and IL-6 ( P =0.99), although the clinical values of ChE and PCT exhibited a marginally significant difference ( P =0.06).
marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
The parents exhibited more-vigilant behaviour in the nest-box with an enlarged entrance (2.07 ± 0.41%) than in that with a control entrance (0.90 ± 0.41%), but this was marginally significant (mixed model, nest F 1,20.1 = 4.12, P = 0.06; playback F 1,21.3 = 0.28, P = 0.60; nest × playback F 1,20.9 = 2.93, P = 0.10; temperature F 1,36.0 = 2.05, P = 0.16; brood F 1,20.5 = 0.88, P = 0.36; Fig. 2b ).