“marginally significant”

The results showed significant (except for “bite” data for wild‐caught individuals) or marginally significant (“bite” data for wild‐caught individuals: p = 0.060) overdispersion, and a negative binomial GLM was built and tested the model using the glm.nb function in the R package MASS (Venables and Ripley 2002 ).

The effect of time-varying pubertal status was marginally significant: a one-unit (between person) increase on the pubertal status scale corresponded to an average contemporaneous reduction in %MVPA of about 0.83% (p = 0.06).

A marginally significant Group×Block interaction during acquisition, F (2, 108) = 2.8, p = .06, η 2 = .05, ε = .79, supported a learning effect.

At the end of 24 weeks, 29 (67%; 95% CI 53% to 80%) in the Ca+D group and 11 (44%; 95% CI 27% to 63%) in the Ca group achieved the primary combined outcome of radiographic and alkaline phosphatase endpoints, and this difference was marginally significant (p=0.06).

ANOVA F-test for overall differences in mean KD incidence by months was marginally significant (F=2.12, p=0.06) Monthly distribution of viral detection A total of 14267 respiratory virus cases were detected during the survey period (2435 in 2009; 6614 in 2010; and 5218 in 2011).

Partial correlation (controlling for AGE GROUP) between event-related SICI modulation at BL and atDCS-induced ΔSICI rest pooled over all time points after stimulation revealed a marginally significant association between event-related SICI modulation and stimulation induced change in resting-state SICI [τ = 0.24, T (29) = 1.86, p = 0.06], indicating more pronounced atDCS-induced SICI effect with better modulatory capacity of event-related SICI.

No significant effects were evident for any of the self-report measures of impulsivity, although a marginally significant interaction effect of DRD2TaqI A and DRD4 VNTR was evident on the SSS Total scale ( F (1,177) = 3.52, p = .06, η p 2 = .02).

A multivariate regression analysis was performed that demonstrated that minor victimization did not have a positive association with depression in women ( β = −0.05, SE = 0.40, p = 0.91), while major victimization on the other hand, had a marginally significant association ( β = 1.00, SE = 0.54, p = 0.06).

According to the logistic regression model, BMT prior to RT was also associated with marginally significant increased rate of CR following RT (OR = 0.099, 95% CI = 0.0086-1.135, P = 0.06).

For infants tested in Paris, the Stimulus Type X Habituation type interaction was marginally significant (F(1,30) = 3.53, p = 0.06), as infants habituated to scale-invariant sounds looked significantly longer to switch than to same trials (Scheffé post hoc: p = 0.02), but infants habituated to variable-scale sounds did not differ in their looks to the two trial types (Scheffé post hoc: p = 0.81).

The results for females were marginally significant for all villages ( N =126, r =−0.14, Student’s t -test P =0.06) and inland villages ( N =29, r =−0.27, Student’s t -test P =0.08), but not for coastal villages ( N =97, r =−0.1, Student’s t -test P =0.14).

This was not true for INT concepts, where no differences between those conditions were found (agents: M = 3.01, SE = 0.22, non-agents: M = 2.54, SE = 0.23), even though a similar, but marginally significant trend was observed (p = .06).

A marginally significant moderation effect was found when adding the EOTxEF interaction term to the model (Δ R 2 = 0.03, p = .06).

The mean age of HPV-16 seropositive individuals was lower (38.5±12.7) than among those HPV seronegative (41.9±12.2); this result was marginally significant (p=0.06).

However, Roy’s greatest root test indicated potential effects of age and gender that might be worth further investigation, yielding a significant p-value for age ( p = 0.01) and a marginally significant value for gender ( p = 0.06, Figure 1 ).

Conversely, in the uncertain condition, fair offers elicited a marginally significant higher P300 than unfair offers (2.37 vs. 2.15 μV; F 1,23 = 4.00, p = 0.06).

The three-way interaction of prime duration × prime congruence × group was marginally significant, F (1, 48) = 3.6, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.97.

Also, there was a marginally significant difference for intake of fish ( p = 0.06) and low-fat dairy ( p = 0.07).

Marginally significant differences were found between the female and male groups at baseline for inter- and intra-hemispheric gamma coherence [ t (35) = 1.97, 1.96, p = 0.06], but not for theta or alpha.

In the final multivariate model, only gender was found to be significant (p = 0.02), while physical illness was marginally significant (p = 0.06) Discussion To our knowledge this is the first study from Pakistan that measures the prevalence estimate of anxiety using a validated instrument.

In this case, there was a main effect of condition [ F (1,55) = 4.8, p < 0.05] and a marginally significant interaction with group [ F (1,55) = 3.8, p < 0.06].

Here, NGSD are the only significant contribution to the dingo group in the two-lineage models, but this signal is mostly lost when three lineages are used, although there was a marginally significant contribution from NGSD ( p = 0.06).

A post-hoc t -test comparing the two groups at follow-up was marginally significant, t (38) = 1.94, p = .06.

A marginally significant main effect of tDCS condition was found on overall RTs at recognition ( F (2,20) = 3.2, P = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.24), but not of stimulus familiarity ( F (1,10) = 1.5, P >0.1, η p 2 = 0.13) or interaction ( F (2,20) = 0.64, P >0.1, η p 2 = 0.06).

Among individuals with skin lesions, we found a significant association of CC16 with urinary As (β = −0.13, p = 0.01) and a marginally significant association of CC16 with CAI (β = −0.04, p = 0.06).