“marginally significant”

Gender-based analysis of normalized brain volumes revealed ( Table 2 ) a significant difference between male and female participants in total frontal volume ( p = 0.012) and a marginally significant difference in total parietal volume ( p = 0.066).

Compared with overweight individuals, obese patients showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.066) with a lower likelihood of having DR (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52–1.02).

A supplementary sensitivity analysis decomposing ARSME into behavioral engagement and psychological investment components revealed that psychological investment showed a marginally significant prospective effect on body dissatisfaction ( β = 0.08, p = 0.066), while behavioral screen time did not, providing preliminary support for cognitive-processing-focused interventions.

The results of time estimation showed that the difference between the experimental and control groups was marginally significant, t (55) = 1.87, p = 0.066, Cohen’s d = 0.5, and that the experimental group ( M = 7.57 s, SD = 3.63) was smaller than the control group ( M = 9.34 s, SD = 3.41).

Although the direct effect of the combination on satisfaction was marginally significant (B=–0.162, p = .066), its indirect path through trust was significant (B = 0.291, 95% CI [0.095, 0.483]), supporting hypothesis H5 and validating the partial mediating effect of verbal behavior combinations by a mediation role of trust.

In addition to the main effects, there were marginally significant Target Number × Visibility ( F (1, 9) = 4.37, p = 0.066, η p 2 = 0.33) and Target Number × Task Perturbation ( F (1, 9) = 4.79, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.35) interactions.

In addition, E&S condition also showed a higher activation than E&NS (marginally significant, t (15)=2.88, P =0.066, Bonferroni corrected, ES=0.72) and NE&NS ( t (15)=3.32, P =0.025, Bonferroni corrected, ES=0.83) conditions.

A further rmANOVA, in which the percentiles P 1 , P 3 , and P 5 were compared, revealed a significant main effect of the factor time point ( F (1.61, 51.76) = 58.0, p < .001, η p 2 = .64), a marginally significant main effect of the factor percentile ( F (2, 64) = 2.84, p = .066, η p 2 = .08), and a significant interaction time point * percentile ( F (4, 128) = 13.19, p < .001, η p 2 = .29).

Study design showed a marginally significant trend ( p = 0.066).

For future metabolic risk score, BCAAs showed a marginally significant effect on metabolic syndrome risk (OR = 3.222, p = 0.066), while different results were from Hellmuth et al.'s study, which suggested tyrosine, rather than BCAAs, was the useful biomarker for future risk of IR and metabolic risk in 80 obese children with one-year follow-up.

Separately, none of the models using green and blue space availability ( Supplementary Material Table S3 ) showed statistically relevant direct or indirect effects on the outcomes, with the sole exception of a marginally significant increase of 36 g ( p = 0.066) in BW in children delivered by mothers with green-space availability in 300 m in the model using NO 2 concentrations as mediator ( Supplementary Material Table S4 ).

Statistical results We found no significant difference in mean parasite richness between sloth species (ANOVA: F 1,34 = 1.3, P = 0.263) or habitat types ( F 1,34 = 0.4, P = 0.544), but there was a marginally significant sloth species × habitat type interaction ( F 1,34 = 3.6, P = 0.066).

IBD type specific analysis For HLA‐DQA1*02:01‐HLA‐DRB1*07:01 and IBD type the interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.066), but not for rs2647085 and IBD type ( p = 0.287; Table S1 ).

The group × stimulation interaction term was marginally significant, F (2, 54) = 2.85, p = 0.066, ηp 2 = 0.096.

On the other hand, a positive correlation was found between NfL and age at treatment ( r = 0.59, P = .046) along with a marginally significant correlation between NfL and duration of the disease ( r = 0.55, P = .066) (Figure 2 E and 2 ).

Additionally, the corresponding OR for the high-level group (>10 mg/g cre.) is 3.05, a marginally significant result ( p = 0.066). 4.

Respiration rates after 6 months in the treatments were not significantly influenced by acidification, but tended to be lower in acidified conditions (reflected in a marginally significant interaction between pH and acclimation: F 1 = 4.513, p = 0.066; S2 Table ; Fig 2D ).

There was a marginally significant difference in Na between the AE and NE [−3.40 ± 1.03 vs. −4.03 ± 1.17, t (43) = 1.89, p = 0.066].

(2012) (marginally significant p = 0.066), Gaston et al.

The association with overall survival in non‐smoker patients remained marginally significant in multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards regression after adjustment for age, gender, and tumor stage (n = 130, HR = 0.560 [95% CI 0.30‐1.04]; P = .066) (Table S6 ).

Additionally, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, which was conducted for CBF values between genotypes and time interaction terms, showed that genotypes ( p = 0.012) and time ( p < 0.0001) significantly affected the CBF values, and that the interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.066).

The number of sexually active learners who reported more than one sex partner was higher in boys than in girls, though the association was marginally significant (boys = 50% vs. girls = 31.8%; χ 2 (n = 102) = 3.39, p = 0.066).

Below 0.78 mmol/L, Mg exhibited a marginally significant inverse correlation with METS-IR (β = -0.307, p = 0.066), which became non-significant above this level, indicating reduced insulin resistance with rising Mg concentrations in hypomagnesemia, which means that supplementary of Mg for people with hypomagnesemia might alleviate the insulin resistance.

The multivariable meta-regression was marginally significant (χ2 = 29.01, p = 0.066), but substantial residual heterogeneity persisted (I 2 = 98.6%).

In addition, significant correlations were observed between the score on the Purdue Pegboard task and the early RRN for right-hand stimuli for the left hemisphere, r = 0.646, p < 0.05 and a marginally significant effect for the right hemisphere, r = 0.601, p = 0.066.