When those with CAT C-262T C/C were defined as reference, those with CAT C-262T C/T demonstrated the OR for CKD of 0.67 (95% CI 0.43–1.06) with the marginally significant trend for decreased odds ratio with increasing numbers of T allele ( p = 0.070).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Nevertheless, there was a marginally significant relation of the SOT score to the number of choices in response strategy ( estimate = 0.33, t (69) = 1.8, p = 0.07).
There was, nonetheless, an overall tendency toward higher hatchability, with a marginally significant increase in hatchability when hermaphrodites and embryos were exposed to normoxia (t 4,5 p = 0.07).
Results Migration distance and recruitment of new neurons When exploring links between migration distance and new neuronal recruitment in turtle doves we found marginally significant increase in recruitment into the NCL for birds flying longer distances (P = 0.07; ρ = 0.53; N = 12; Fig. 1 ), but not in the HC (P = 0.96; ρ = −0.01; N = 11).
There was a marginally significant effect of the nested factor, Type of QBE condition, F (1, 1531) = 3.39, p = .07, eta 2 = 0.002.
The decrease in total Hg in the brain over time was marginally significant ( p < 0.07), with an apparent T 1/2 of 59.5 ± 24.1 days.
The mean doses for the ipsilateral heart in TomoDirect and 3D-CRT of left breast cancer patients were 1.44 Gy and 2.32 Gy, respectively, and the difference was marginally significant ( p =0.070).
Follow-up analyses revealed that while there were no significant interactions between group and trial quadrant for phases IS and NL (all ps ≥ 0.160), there was a marginally significant interaction for the FT data, F (1,62) = 3.399, p = 0.070, partial η 2 = 0.052.
Other motivational differences between EAs and MAs were not statistically significant, although a marginally significant trend emerged such that wanting to improve energy was less important for EAs than for MAs (4.04 v. 4.59, F [1, 149] = 3.23, p = .07).
Second, the simple main effect of facial expression was significant under the congruent condition, F (1, 17) = 6.89, MSE = 52.55, p = .018, η 2 p = .29, and marginally significant under the direct gaze condition, F (1, 17) = 3.74, MSE = 59.41, p = .070, η 2 p = .18.
We found that unretired older adults’ negative attitudes toward older population in personality and mental health predicted a lower likelihood of post-retirement employment planning at a marginally significant level (p = .07), even after controlling socioeconomic status.
Moreover, we observed a marginally significant ( p = 0.07, Mann–Whitney test) difference in the number of DRMs of NS3-specific DAAs (4–10) and multi-protein DAAs (8–16).
There was also a marginally significant interaction between stimulus type and laterality [ F (6, 114) = 2.28, P = 0.07].
The effects of predator exposure also showed a marginally significant interaction with the season ( p = .07).
Specifically, posthoc Tukey's HSD tests suggested the diagnosis × NU interaction effect was significant in the OFC ( p = .049; did not survive correction for multiple comparisons), ACC ( p = .042), and marginally significant in the dlPFC ( p = .070).
An equally positive but marginally significant association was found for visiting cool places (β = 0.420; p-value = 0.07) and using air conditioning (β = 0.604; p-value = 0.053).
While we failed to find a significant interaction effect [ F (3,102) = 2.28, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.01], we did find a marginally significant effect of control type [ F (1,34) = 3.44, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.05] (see Figure 3 for a plot of the data associated with this analysis, as well as Table 2 for each cell of the repeated measures ANOVA).
The study found marginally significant differences between Sad and Neutral faces (p = .070) ( Table 3 ).
In addition, there was a marginally significant association between higher BDNF levels and higher fasting glucose levels ( r = 0.10, P = 0.07).
The performance on training trials was very similar between the two groups (t(18) = 1.51, p = 0.15), however the difference in performance on test trials was marginally significant (t(18) = 1.87, p = 0.07).
ETV score was only a marginally significant predictor of prison violations after impression sensitivity and trust behavior were accounted for (direct effect = 0.622 ± 0.340, p = 0.070).
High CD3D/CD4 ratio was associated with significantly improved survival in two of three cohorts ( GSE31684 , P =0.02; GSE5287 , P =0.035) and marginally significant survival benefits in the other cohort (CIT, P =0.07).
Independent-samples t tests showed that while there was no significant productivity difference in recall Session 1 for individuals in the control ( M = 27.03, SD = 12.12) and collective ( M = 24.94, SD = 9.40) conditions, t (70) = .81, p = .42, the difference between these two sets of participants in recall Session 2 was marginally significant, t (70) = 1.81, p = .07, where participants in the control condition recalled more items ( M = 26.08, SD = 13.01) than those in the collective condition ( M = 21.53, SD = 7.67; see Figure 2 ).
For three out of five assessments, namely those tapping invented spelling, phonological awareness skills, and word recognition, the difference between treatment and control group reached significance; however, for decoding the effect was marginally significant ( p < .07) and for letter knowledge non-significant.
The assertion accuracy x response accuracy interaction investigating the consequences of exposure to inaccurate assertions was marginally significant, b = .78, t = 1.80, p = .07.