“marginally significant”

These effects should be interpreted in the light of a marginally significant interaction in Step 2 ( O R =4.436, p =0.090).

However, we note that the difference in willingness for finger prick between the two groups is marginally significant, p = 0.09, yielding a larger effect size, r = 0.42 than willingness for taking strong medication, r = 0.29.

The difference between the VR group and 2D group during training was marginally significant ( p = .09, d = 0.50, 95% CI [0.16, 0.83]), with the 2D group showing marginally significantly lower percentages of tachygastria than the VR group.

RBANS List Learning In the acute treatment condition, there was a marginally significant effect of condition on RBANS List Learning change in words remembered ( F (2, 21.82) = 2.76, p = 0.09).

Figure 4 part d shows that CHESS+CM had a marginally significant positive effect on information competence at alpha = .079, P = .09; information competence had a positive but nonsignificant effect on ACQ at beta = .063, P = .64.

In drug overdose suicides, the difference between the mean age of men (53.78 ± 15.13) and women (45.00 ± 17.33) is marginally significant ( p = 0.090).

The Fisher's exact test indicated that the association between TB and influenza death was marginally significant ( P = 0.09).

When order was added to the model, there was only a marginally significant finding between video condition and post-peak decline in oxytocin, b = 0.005, SE = 0.003, p = 0.09.

The difference in the mean±SD age was marginally significant (p=0.09) between the IPD and no-IPD groups (37.89±2.61 vs 37.35±2.37).

Rural residents demonstrated stronger associations for both D/NAO (OR =1.65, P=0.003) and DAO (OR =2.29, P=0.003) compared to urban residents, with a marginally significant interaction (P=0.09).

A marginally significant trend was detected in which cerivastatin‐exposed females weighed 5% less than control females at week zero (LMM; n = 76, t = −1.74, P = 0.09; Fig. 2 A).

The unique effect of generating a metacognitive definition of playing was marginally significant, Wald χ 2 (1) = 2.93, p = .09.

The main effect of group was marginally significant ( F (1,32) = 3.06 P = 0.09, partial η 2 = 0.09).

Nevertheless, if we exclude arbitrarily participant #4 whose anxiety score was 45, the motor correlation with anxiety remains marginally significant ( r = 0.35, d.f. = 21, two-tailed p = 0.09), as well as the interaction between state anxiety and threat level (mixed-design ANOVA, F 1,22 = 3.1, p = 0.09).

tsugae beginning with Instar 2, and was marginally significant at α = 0.10 for the pupal and adult stages (χ 2 = 2.72, df = 1, p = 0.09).

More specifically, the contrast was marginally significant at 3 versus 18 months (X 2 (1) = 2.88, p = 0.09), and significant in the 9 to 18 months’ contrast (X 2 (1) = 6.6, p = 0.01), with higher values of voiced segments per second for fathers, see Fig. 1 b.

brevis ) reduced aggression compared to both the Abx-treated flies ( Figure 1 A; significant: p-value ∗∗∗∗<0.0001and p-value ∗∗<0.005, respectively) and the control group (marginally significant, p-value = 0.09).

There was no evidence of a treatment × day of gestation effect for 12th rib back fat ( P = 0.85), rump fat ( P = 0.48), total plasma protein concentrations ( P = 0.85), or plasma 3-methylhistidine ( P = 0.84); however, there was a marginally significant treatment × day of gestation effect for plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentration ( P = 0.09).

When all participants were included, regardless of having seen the nudge, the effect of condition was marginally significant, F (2,254) = 2.43, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.02.

The results showed a marginally significant effect of friends’ number on materialism ( β = 0.10, t = 1.69, p = 0.09), which partially supported Hypothesis 1.

GPP chl a was reduced by similar amounts on d 4 in Avicennia and Ecklonia (marginally significant at p = 0.09) plots, but interestingly after 17 d Avicennia plots had higher GPP chl a (by 23%) compared to control plots.

Based on logistic regression, the effect of conspecific density on the probability of mortality differed by species: brown shrimp exhibited a marginally significant trend towards D-D mortality when also accounting for shrimp size ( p = 0.09) while white shrimp did not exhibit density-dependence ( p = 0.58; Fig 5 ).

There was also a marginally significant decrease in the right hippocampal SNIPE grading scores (t = −1.69, p = 0.09, Fig. 4 c).

Rectal mucosal inflammation was higher in secretions collected at baseline among MSM engaging in RAI compared to controls There was a marginally significant ( p = 0.09) difference in overall cytokine profile across all study visits between the MSM-RAI and control groups with five significantly elevated cytokines in the MSM-RAI group (IL-1β, IL-17A, IP-10, IL-8, and IFN-γ; all p < 0.05 for individual cytokines, Fig. 1 A and Supplementary Table 1 ).

A second parental motivation construct, reward, was also rated higher as a reason for allowing screen time by mothers with less education (mean 3.73, SD 1.76) as compared with mothers with high education (mean 3.08, SD 1.66), showing a marginally significant difference of 0.65 (95% CI −0.11 to 1.41; t 84 =1.70; P =.09; Cohen d =0.38; considering a P value of .10).