“marginally significant”

Among individual observations, marginally significant group by load interactions ( p <0.1, FDR corrected) were found for C net and E local,net at most of the observations.

This model was used to test for significant ( p = 0.05 threshold) and marginally significant ( p = 0.1 threshold) differences in the following traits: φCO 2 max, app , φCO 2 max, abs , φCO 2 max, abs PSII , 1/ k , α , A sat , R d , and F v /F m .

Across all analyses, we used the conventional alpha level of p ≤ 0.05 as the criterion for significance, but also report marginally significant findings (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10), specifying effect sizes in all cases.

In contrast, the effect of CACS-2 was statistically insignificant ( b = 0.027, p > 0.1), and CACS-8 exhibited only a marginally significant, weak effect ( b = 0.184, p < 0.1).

Statistically significant or marginally significant variables ( P < 0.1) and RT field (SM vs.

To evaluate independent factors associated with ACP, significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) bivariate risk factors (using the above-mentioned tests) were examined using univariate and multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression analysis.

Finally, explanatory variables found to be marginally significant (p<0.10) in bivariate analyses were tested in multivariable linear regression Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) models with cluster-robust SEs to account for clustering.

In addition, ImTH scores showed marginally significant positive correlations with OS ( P < 0.1) in four cancer types (GBM, KIRC, SARC, and THCA) (Supplementary Fig. 1A ).

The interaction terms indicate that neither precipitation nor temperature effects vary significantly by age according to conventional thresholds of statistical significance (the age-by-temperature interaction term is marginally significant at p < 0.10).

Results were considered marginally significant for 0.05 < P ≤ 0.1.

These results remained marginally significant ( p < 0.1) following FDR correction. fMRI Results As a data quality check, a main effects analysis was performed for the related and unrelated pairs in the noTMS condition.

Results of the two-tailed t -test showed that all pyrethroids showed significant loss ( p < 0.05) with the untreated jar and the silanized jar, and all pyrethroids except permethrin showed marginally significant loss ( p < 0.10) in the vortexed jar.

Moreover, although the main effect for SVO in the analysis of Security was marginally significant ( p = .10), the mean differences were in the opposite direction to the mean differences in the analysis of Conformity.

Grade 1 falls (the least severe, causing no injury) were the most common in both years, and showed a marginally significant decrease in number (0.05 < p <0.1), while the differences for the more severe falls were never significant.

Tests were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****) or marginally significant when 0.05 < p < 0.1.

To determine independent predictors for MACE, a multivariate Cox regression analysis was developed with the significant predictors ( P < 0.05) and the marginally significant ones ( P < 0.10) from the univariate model. 3.

Explanatory factors were considered statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant if p ≤ 0.10.

Then, those factors showing at least a marginally significant correlation ( P < 0.1) were screened out to construct a Multivariable logistic regression model.

Marginally significant value was set at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1.

[ 33 ] found a positive association (reported by authors as marginally significant at p < 0.10) between exposure to post hurricane-related (Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005) stressors and increased AU in individuals with a history of low income (estimate = 58.41, standard error (SE) = 31.45), but not among individuals with a history of middle income.

In TMT‐B, the Type C group (201.69 ± 87.24) showed a significant decrease compared to the Type A group (194.80 ± 98.82) ( p < 0.05) and marginally significant decrease compared to the Type B group (283.14 ± 109.07) ( p < 0.10).

A paired-samples t-test revealed a marginally significant effect in learning gains when low prior knowledge students were assigned to Tutor Mode (p = .10).

*** P < 0.005, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ms P marginally significant after multiple test correction ( P < 0.1), ns P not significant after multiple test correction.

The indirect relationship is marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

For younger participants, there was a marginally significant positive correlation between the number of fixations made during encoding and subsequent recognition (Pearson's r = 0.18, n = 84, p = 0.10), and a significant positive correlation between the number of transitions and subsequent recognition ( r = 0.41, n = 84, p < 0.001).