“marginally significant”

Table 3 presents the results of the final multivariate models, including marginally significant predictors from the factor models at p < 0.10 as well as demographic predictors.

The effect of the achievement goal condition was however marginally significant ( B = −0.75; p < 0.10), and the interaction between the motive to avoid failure and the achievement goal condition was significantly related to emotionality during problem-solving ( B = 0.10; p < 0.05).

In addition, 31% of corals from Butaritari (N = 13) had partial mortality scars associated with the 2004 bleaching event, while none from Abaiang and North Tarawa showed such scars (N = 12); this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.10, permutation test).

We selected marginally significant variables for each model ( P < 0.1) using backwards step-wise regression using the R package vegan ( Zelenı, 2011 ; Oksanen et al., 2015 ).

Lymphocyte count was marginally significant association with ETE, with ORs of 42%, 49.1%, and 46.4%, respectively, at a significance level of P <0.1 not at P <0.05, while TC did not show statistical significance.

Of the 30 interaction terms we tested, five reached the level of statistical significance (P < 0.05) with an additional three marginally significant (P < 0.10) ( Table 2 ).

For all analyses, the factors were considered statistically significant (SS) for p ≤ 0.05, marginally significant (MS) for 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10, and nonsignificant (NS) for p > 0.10.

However, during spring we recorded a weak and marginally significant trend ( P = 0.1) towards lower Ψ min (by ~13%) and higher g L (by ~33%) in D trees compared to H ones.

The increase in activity from early intervals (120–130) to the intervals between 160 and 180 ms, was marginally significant (both p <.10; Bonferroni corrected).

The indirect relationship is marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

A 3 (condition: observation versus fair play versus exclusion) × 2 (segment: first half versus second half) ANOVA showed a marginally significant main effect of condition ( F (1, 36) = 2.46, P = 0.10, η p 2 = 0.12).

SalpIL2 -only animals had a marginally significant increase of 260% in NK cell populations compared with controls ( P < 0.10).

In contrast, several variables showed marginally significant trends (0.05 < P < 0.10): soil pH ( P = 0.071; Figure 3b ), non-photochemical quenching ( P = 0.082; Figure 3e ), legume abundance ( P = 0.077; Figure 3i ), and species richness ( P = 0.082; Figure 3m ) all exhibited slight non-linear trajectories.

Coercive mobility is marginally significant at p < 0.10.

001); a marginally significant change in the standard deviations suggests that some departments saw greater declines than others ( Levene statistic = 2 . 91 , p < . 10) .

Differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells showed a marginally significant increase in the ZH group compared with the control group (P < 0.1), while no significant differences were found in the Z group (P > 0.1).

For the Avicularia/Laciniata lineage marginally significant ( p -value <0.1) results were obtained for linear axes slightly south of due east and between ∼230° to 270° ( Fig. 1e ).

The relationships with wilting scores were marginally significant ( P < 0.1).

Regression analyses, which incorporated variables in the bivariate comparisons that were at least marginally significant at p < 0.10, were used to examine adjusted least-square means for HRQoL by level of presenteeism.

AF13 showed significant changes in glycolytic compounds glucose and pyruvate with significant decreases ( p < 0.05) in both compounds at 4 DAI in response to stress with glucose and fructose levels showing marginally significant increases at 7 DAI ( p < 0.10; Fig. 3 ).

In the multivariable analysis, we incorporated lifestyle and psychosocial variables any category of which was statistically significant or marginally significant ( P < .1) in univariable analyses considering the possibility of multicollinearity.

R-square increase by 3.2% due to interaction term is marginally significant, F (2, 133) = 2.31, p = 0.10.

Circular Material Usage shows a marginally significant negative effect (−3.995, p < 0.1), suggesting that adoption of circular economy practices contributes to FW reduction, supporting sustainability objectives.

When further adjusted for gynecology-related factors (Model 3), the association between moderate/severe dysmenorrhea and a higher level of psychological distress was marginally significant (β = 1.548, p < 0.10), and moderate/severe psychological symptoms of PMS were significantly associated with a higher level of psychological distress (β = 3.978, p < 0.001).

Asia, Latin-America & the Caribbean and Eastern Europe & Central Asia) with two more marginally significant (e.g. sub-Saharan Africa, High-Income; p<0.10).