“marginally significant”

For T2, the correlation coefficient for Yourself for perceived support by older relatives was marginally significant ( p < 0.1), while the coefficients for both Yourself and Future generations were both significant for perceived support to younger relatives ( p < 0.001).

It was also interesting to point out the presence of values of p marginally significant (0.05≤p<0.10), indicating a statistical tendency of improved performance of the FrOr model in terms of Rd in patients with abnormal performance in the ADL-Glitre test and MSE Xrs in conditions of normal performance in the Handgrip analysis ADL-Glitre test.

Coercive mobility is marginally significant at p < 0.10.

Results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant (tendency) at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

The two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of stage (F (1, 18) = 3.24, p < 0.1) and a significant marginally interaction between group and stage (F (1, 18) = 3.04, p < 0.1).

We report below eye-tracking measures presenting statistically significant fixed effects of typicality, pronoun , and typicality*pronoun ( p < 0.05), and corresponding significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.1) results of contrast analyses, separated for measure.

The interaction of SES and walkability was marginally significant between lower and higher SES municipalities ( P <0.1) but not significant between medium and higher SES municipalities (Table S1 ).

Again, the coefficient for narcissism was positive and marginally significant ( β = 0.03, p < .10), indicating that narcissists remained more confident than non-narcissists even after controlling for initial levels of self-confidence. 2.2.7 Discussion The results confirmed that narcissists were more confident, saw experts as less useful, and were more impulsive than non-narcissists.

For interpretation, impacts were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and marginally significant at p < 0.1.

Potential predictors are defined as variables with at least a marginally significant association (p<0.10) with the outcome.

The analysis revealed the following findings that are statistically significant or marginally significant ( P < .10): Patients in the ICUs were more likely to provide clinicians with information about their job (17.5%) than in Med-Surg, 8.4%; χ 2 (1) = 3.23; P = .07.

ResF personnel had a statistically significant 11.3% lower MHSU for the ‘any’ service category and specifically, a 9.1% lower medication service use, as well as a marginally significant (p≤0.10) 5.4% lower counselling service use.

Marginally significant terms (0.05 < p < 0.1) remained in the model due to the even minimal interaction effects, contributing to the fit and prediction capability of the regression models to explore subtle interaction effects and reduction of type II errors (Greenland et al. 2016 ; Morganstein and Wasserstein 2014 ).

We also find that ethnic heterogeneity is positively associated with violent crime, albeit at the marginally significant threshold (p < .10), while the percentage of Black residents also shows a positive association with the outcome.

A stepwise multiple variable logistic regression model was created, using death within 24 h as a dependent variable that considered variables which were marginally significant ( p < 0.10) in the univariate logistic regression as covariates (APACHE scores >20, >65 years of age, sepsis, FiO 2 per 10 % increase, epinephrine dose >10 μg/min, norepinephrine dose >20 μg/min, vasopressin dose >0.02 μg/min).

The correlations with maternal negativity were in the expected direction —risk was uncorrelated with negativity for the 7-absent mothers and higher risk was correlated with stronger negativity for the 7-present mothers—but this was only a marginally significant effect ( p <.10).

Additionally, while results at AUMC indicated a marginally significant decrease in CMT in the hypertension cohort compared with the control cohort during the follow-up period (all P <0.1), no significant differences were observed at SNUBH.

late), stimulation intensity (three levels), and interval (five levels) as within-subject factors revealed only a marginally significant first-order interaction between phase and interval (p < 0.1).

With increasing shrub canopy size, the relative abundance of Ascomycota significantly increased ( p = 0.001), while the relative abundance of Basidiomycota showed a decreasing trend (marginally significant, p < 0.1) (Fig. 5 a, b).

For instance, higher levels of structural–associational solidarity were associated with a slightly higher probability of expecting filial care at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1).

All calculations and analyses were conducted in the statistical program R version 4.2.3 (R Core Team 2023 ) ( α = 0.05, with results 0.05 < p < 0.1 reported as marginally significant). 3.

Results were considered significant with P ≤ 0.05 and were considered marginally significant with P ≤ 0.10.

Since the effect of cultivar was significant ( p -value < 0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 ≤ p -value < 0.1) on most of the constituents, further multiple means comparison was completed using the lsmeans statement of Proc Mixed (equivalent to Fisher’s least significant difference [LSD]) at 5% level of significance and letter groupings were generated.

No CMF consumption showed a marginally significant association with CMS (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.89–3.36, p = 0.10).

2b ; site 64 was marginally significant at P < 0.10) were found to be under positive selection in the inclusive data (Fig. 3b ), with particular amino acid variable within species but shared between alleles of different species.