“marginally significant”

Factors that were independently associated in the univariate analysis, being at least marginally significant (P ≤ 0.1), were included using a backward step-wise strategy.

All the cross-lagged paths remained significant, except the relationship between functional dependence at T1 and depressive symptoms at T2, which was marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.10).

There was also a marginally significant ( p <.10) interaction between race and sex in the transition from C 1 to A .

Marginally significant differences (0.05 < p < 0.10) were also reported.

Column (2) of Table 3 shows that Internet access maintains a marginally significant negative association with mental health problem ( p < 0.10) after controlling for province fixed effects, corresponding to a 6.4% improvement in mental health.

3 , 19 , 22 Overall, the combined pericardiectomy rate was 65% (95% CI: 43–82%) and the between-study variability in pericardiectomy rates was marginally significant ( p = 0.10; I 2 = 56%).

3 The “ steps ” argument allows further customization of the selection model, such as allowing for selection based on one‐tailed rather than two‐tailed hypothesis tests or allowing for selection that also favors “marginally significant” results with a two‐tailed p < 0.10 to a lesser degree than it favors “significant” results.

Tumor Perfusion Changes Mean blood flow and volume declined significantly ( P < .05) between baseline and the first recheck for the whole tumor and was marginally significant for the tumor center ( P < .1) based on raw P value although none were significant after adjusting for multiple testing (FDR <0.05) (Table 1 ).

Also, compared to non-SO windows, there was no significant difference between outflow in half a cycle after SO trough (phase = π ) and significant or marginally significant (0.05 < P value < 0.1) difference between outflow in − π phase, which can be caused by the effect of a prior SO on the successive SO in a sequence of SOs.

Regarding the theta power, the three-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect for electrode location [ F (2, 84) = 133.81, p < 0.01] and a marginally significant interaction between condition and set [ F (6, 84) = 1.95, p < 0.1].

Our results also show that lower deforestation rates were associated with increasing numbers of employees in non-agricultural companies, although this result had less support since it was marginally significant (p<0.1).

It was also shown that ADHD patients had more problems with social relations with their peers although the effects were marginally significant (i.e., p < 0.1). 3.2.

Estimates for Specifications 2 and 3 reduced similarly and were both marginally significant ( p < 0.10) in Model 2.

The interaction effect of “group × intervention period” on BBS score was marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.10): the BBS score of IG was significantly increased after intervention compared to baseline; however, CG remained almost unchanged over the same period ( Table 4 ).

There were marginally significant effects, at the P =.10 level, for improvement in strong agreement for beliefs about the importance of eating fruits and vegetables, and in taking prenatal vitamins, to the health of the developing baby.

Both baseline CUDIT and cannabis craving showed marginally significant associations with treatment progress ( p < 0.10).

The marginally significant inverse relationship between HbA1c and all-cause mortality observed when δNfL is set at its mean (CDE < 0, p < 0.10) becomes non-significant when δNfL is not fixed in the total population with this difference in effect caused by pure interaction as well as mediated interaction (IR > 0, IM > 0, p < 0.05), indicative of synergism between HbA1c and δNfL in determining mortality risk.

However, the response rate did not vary significantly between demographic variables (e.g., age, sex, occupation, marital status), place of residence, smoking and alcohol history at the residence, or clinical characteristics, except that the rTMS protocol used had some marginally significant ( p -value < 0.10) effect on the response rate.

In addition, these data show the marginally significant downregulation of miR-138-5p after LGA stimulation at 1 day of culture (two-tailed paired t -test, T 3 = 2.854, p = 0.1; Figure 6 and the table in Figure S2C ).

Model A3 combined demographic and the five constructs and explained the most variance of the first three models (McFadden R 2 = 0.380), with general practitioner status again emerging as a marginally significant positive predictor ( OR = 16.74, p < 0.10); none of the five constructs reached significance in this combined model.

Finally, our age-stratified analyses demonstrated that while middle-aged adults (45–64 years) generally exhibited stronger mediation effects of internet use in the cognition-depression pathway compared to older adults (≥65 years), with most comparisons reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05), some pathways showed marginally significant differences (0.05 < p < 0.1) that warrant cautious interpretation.

There were two variables with a marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.10) association with condoms use at last sex: having sex with more than one sexual partner (AOR 3.38; 95% CI 0.87, 13.10) and speaking to at least one sex partner about HIV testing (AOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14, 1.02).

Marginally significant interactions ( p < 0.1) were explored with pairwise comparisons for the frontal and parietal electrode sites separately, with Bonferroni correction to correct for multiple comparisons.

Child age and gender were marginally significant predictors ( P < .10) of daily PA.

However, the influence of soil cultivation method on community composition of bacteria was marginally significant (significant at P < 0.1), and using the “forward selection of environmental variables” tool in Canoco 5.0 software, a significant influence of ploughing was confirmed (explaining 10.3% of the total data variability, pseudo-F = 2.3, P = 0.004).