Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

In the power spectra of the different groups, the statistical results showed that the differences in the power spectra between the walking and resting periods exhibited a significant increase in the lesion group compared with the sham group for the delta and gamma bands ( Figure 7 A,E, Table 1 ) and a marginally significant increase for the theta, alpha, and beta bands ( Figure 7 B–D, Table 1 ).
Effect of feeding diet on alpha and beta diversity There were no statistically significant differences in ASV richness or Faith’s phylogenetic diversity index between treatment groups at the end of the feeding trial, although marginally significant differences were observed between experimental groups (Table 3 ).
When stratifying women with endometriosis by diagnosis ascertainment type (self-reported vs hospital-based diagnosis) in the UKBB, a significant association with basophil counts was observed for self-reported endometriosis diagnosis for women with basophil counts of 0.01–0.04 (OR = 1.25, 95% CI (1.03–1.50)) and basophil counts of >0.04 (OR = 1.28, 95% CI (1.05–1.56), P trend = 0.013), and a marginally significant association for hospital-made diagnoses (OR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.94–1.28) for women with basophil counts of 0.01–0.04; and OR = 1.17, 95% CI (1.00–1.37) for women with counts above the upper tercile, P trend = 0.047).
The P/L ratio (HR =1.002 per 1 unit, 95% CI, 1.000–1.003, P=0.003) remained significant while the ALC (HR =0.734 per 1×10 9 cells/L, 95% CI, 0.529–1.017, P=0.063) was shown to be a marginally significant predictor for OS in the combined models ( Table 2 ).
For five additional circRNAs, the same trend was observed in the two cohorts, with expression differences resulting marginally significant (0.05 < p.adj ≤ 0.1) in the validation cohort: circLNPK(5–10), circNDEL1(2–8), circPSEN1(2–3), and circAGFG1(2–5) showed a tendency toward up-regulation in JMML, circPTPN22(8-intr14) toward a general down-regulation.
However, the higher risk of DM patients with good glycemic control at 1-year relative to non-DM patients was not significant for late TLR, although the higher risk of DM patients with good glycemic control at baseline relative to non-DM patients was marginally significant for late TLR.