“marginally significant”

Also, median dissolved oxygen was a marginally significant predictor for GST.

[7] , there is a marginally significant contrast by the −509C/T variant.

However, the standardized regression coefficients of the path from after-training PA score to before-training TTCT score (β = .399; R 2 = .159; p = 0.09) was marginally significant.

A marginally significant association was observed between changes in pRNFL thickness over time and the appearance of new periventricular lesions.

This model revealed a significant difference from the null model (Table 1 ), with both task ( p = 0.054) and DMO strategy ( p = 0.055) having marginally significant effects on individuals’ general performance.

The addition of internship satisfaction to the model resulted in a marginally significant contribution to variance in perceived sense of professional competence (3%).

According to this criterion, the simple main effect of Thematic Role over the left hemisphere was significant or marginally significant from 300 to 600 ms in the beta band (15–30 Hz); the simple main effect of Semantic Relatedness over left-posterior electrodes was significant from 450 to 700 ms in the theta band (4–7 Hz).

After FDR correction, all significant differences were maintained except for LL‐L (adjusted p = 0.044), which was considered marginally significant and did not survive FDR correction ( q = 0.067). 1.

Second, the ERN in the TT task was correlated with the TT effect (TT-non-TT) for item ordering errors, and was marginally significant for the TT effect for errors overall.

The association between higher MedDiet adherence, as measured by the MEDAS score, and higher FMT scores remained marginally significant in both the Mediterranean region (Unadjusted model β: 0.21, SE: 0.07, p : 0.005; Fully adjusted model β: 0.14, SE: 0.07, p : 0.049) and the non-Mediterranean region in the fully adjusted model (Unadjusted model β: 0.14, SE: 0.06, p : 0.01; Fully adjusted model β: 0.11, SE: 0.05, p : 0.45).

However, the indirect effect was marginally significant and should be interpreted with caution, given the near-zero lower confidence bound.

Associations between frequency of past poisoning and high symptom reporting There were marginally significant associations between high poisoning and: (i) washing spraying equipment close to water sources (PRR Close/Other = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.9, 1.6); and (ii) unsafe pesticide disposal practices (PRR Unsafe/Safe = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.9-2.4).

In contrast, in Hong Kong, no direct association between self-presentation and physical symptoms was detected, although an indirect association through social media usage time—leading to increased R-SS—emerged at a marginally significant level.

The FKBP5 showed a marginally significant moderating effect, with simple slope analysis suggesting parenting stress was more strongly associated with child social anxiety among children with higher genetic risk.

However, only three functional pathways were distinct between NS and HS but marginally significant after P value adjusting (Fig.

However, the effect on timing changes is not present in M3, and there is a marginally significant increase in on-call shifts not found in the other models.

19 found that male patients showed a marginally significant decrease in depressive symptoms in being in line with an antidepressant effect of ghrelin as suggested by later study.

The association for remote/very remote patients was marginally significant (for 30-day mortality) possibly because of a lack of power.

Overall, the results from DSS and PNIF did not indicate any differences between the groups, only few and marginally significant p values (between 0.05 and 0.01), which given the large number of statistical tests conducted may be due to multiplicity of testing.

First, it only uses the most significant genes and discards the others, thus resulting in information loss of marginally significant genes.

The indirect path “FWC → health promotion → depressive symptoms” (β = 0.013, p = 0.087) demonstrated a marginally significant indirect association.

These findings conform to the results of the logistic regression although positive but insignificant odds ratios partly corresponded to marginally significant differences in figure 5 (Fig. 5) .

Effects having a significance level of p<0.05, as well as p<0.1 indicating marginally significant effects, are reported.

This hypothesis was marginally significant, with a P value of .09 and an estimate of −0.15.

Although the effect does not approach significance in the conducted ANOVA, post-hoc tests show a marginally significant increase from pre- to posttest for symbols only.