Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Though this difference is not particularly substantial, given that the association was marginally significant for Hispanic Americans ( table 4 ), we propose that the difference may be attributed to the historical connection between the term “woke” and the Black community, thus making the term more racially coded as “Black” and thus foregrounding the in-group connection for Black Americans.
00011019 K 112527 PD 121166 Czech Science Foundation 10.13039/501100001824 15‐11782S 19‐22538S Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic 10.13039/501100005619 DKRVO 2019–2023/6.VIII.c National Museum 10.13039/501100001225 00023272 Standardized directional selection differentials were significant or marginally significant for the tail length of the first‐time breeding males from the Romanian and Czech populations, respectively (Table 2 a).
No significant differences in the relationships between AIP and its modified indices and incident stroke were observed across all subgroups, with the sole exception of a marginally significant interaction between cumulative AIP and sex (P for interaction = 0.048).
While NHST p values tend to be described as either significant or non-significant, with some occasionally using phrases such as “marginally significant” (which really should be phrased “marginally non-significant” if it is to be used at all), Bayesian pH0|D values tend to be described using more graded language.
Study 1 provided little support for the association between TCs and HCC, but supervisor support did affect the association between techno-uncertainty (one of five TCs) and HCC, which was positive when support was low, but negative—albeit marginally significant—when support was high.
Smaller effects were also observed for obesity, with imprecise estimates seen for those first exposed at 4–5 years (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.6–2.7) and marginally significant effects seen for those first exposed at 7 years (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.0–3.2) compared with those without racism exposure.
In multivariate logistic regression analysis, MEOHP was significantly higher in the second [OR = 1.79 (95% CI: 1.15–2.76)] and fourth [OR = 1.70 (95% CI: 1.09–2.64)] quartiles compared with the first quartile and the p -test for linear trend was marginally significant ( p -test for linear trend = 0.088).