It was determined that there was a statistically positive and moderately significant relationship ( r = 0.628; p < 0.001) between the nurses’ mean total score on the PASN and the mean total score on the NPVS.
← all phrases
“moderately significant”
Sighted at
P<0.11p>0.11
In the literature
The findings revealed a moderately significant positive relationship ( r : 0.495; p < 0.001) between perceived health outcomes from nature-based physical activity and mental well-being ( Table 4 ).
2.9 Statistical analysis Quantitative data were conducted as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± S.D.), and the Student’s t - test was used to analyze all experimental data, where the statistical significance * p < 0.05 represents significant, ** p < 0.01 represents moderately significant, and *** p < 0.001 represents highly significant. 3 Result and discussion 3.1 Material characterization The basic characterization of Fe-ZIFs@CoP samples is summarized in Figure 1 .
Nonetheless, a moderately significant correlation was observed between the MFIS and PSQI and MFIS and PHQ2 (r=0.505, P=<0.001 and r=0.520, P=<0.001, respectively).
R 2 ≥ 0.8, p < 0.001) was witnessed for 86% of plasma analytes (103/120) and 88% of serum analytes (106/120), indicating that the capillary blood analyte concentration follows changes in venous analyte concentration. A further 13% of plasma analytes (15/120) and the remaining 12% of serum analytes (14/120) achieved moderately significant linear relationships (50% > R 2 > 79%, all p ≤ 0.001) between collection sites ( Figure 3 ).
CIPS scores showed a moderately significant relationship with the MASS scores in multivariable regression analyses (adjusted R2 = 0.585 p < 0.001, standardized B= -0.668).
A moderately significant negative correlation was found between the total VUCA score and the BRS mean score ( r = -0.412, p < 0.001) [ 56 ] (Table 2 ).
LNR demonstrated a moderately significant correlation (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) with FIGO status and a weak association with LVSI (r = 0.29, p = 0.02).
A moderately significant correlation was also observed between extension strength with weight p < 0.001) and BMI (r range = 0.43–0.46); however, we identified a weak correlation between extension strength with weight and neck circumference (r range = 0.36–0.46).
There was a moderately significant relationship between Syntax score I and Gal-3 values ( p < 0.001).
Our study found a negative and moderately significant correlation between the psychological resilience scale and the perceived stress scale (r = −0.330, p < 0.001).
There was a moderately significant relationship between PAM scores and visually impaired individuals’ self-management, self-efficacy, healthy life awareness, social relations, and environment ( p < 0.001).
Relationship between knowledge of PA and practice of PA Pearson product correlation of knowledge of PA participation and level of practice of PA indicated a moderately significant (r=0.159, p<0.001); the r value of 0.159 implicates that there was a positive correlation.
Studying the correlation between MetS component numbers and the same variables revealed a moderately significant correlation between the number of MetS components and the percentage of body fat ( r = 0.355, p < 0.001) and the percentage of body muscle mass ( r = 0.325, p < 0.001).
A positive and moderately significant correlation was found between the total score for the Nurses’ Professional Values Scale–Revised and the Spiritual Care-Giving Scale ( r = 0.526, p < 0.001).
There was a moderately significant correlation between total QOL in comparison with caregivers’ educational level and mobility capacity, with R values of 0.54 (p<0.001) and 0.62 (p<0.001), respectively.
The Spearman correlation coefficient revealed a moderately significant negative association between the mean μTBS and the nanoleakage data (ρ = -0.683, p < 0.001).
The corresponding data analysis was solved based on recommended approaches in these software tools to determine the comparison of the variances of data as *P < 0.05 (statistically significant), ** P < 0.01 (moderately significant), ***P < 0.001 (highly significant) and **** P < 0.0001 (extremely significant).
The study group demonstrated a moderately significant correlation between knowledge (r = 0.27, p = 0.001) and practice (r = 0.28, p = 0.001) and a marginally weaker relationship with awareness (r = 0.25, p = 0.001).
The correlation analysis between satisfaction and self-confidence showed a moderately significant association between these two variables (r = 0.579, p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).
As seen in Fig 2 , neuroticism had a moderately significant direct effect on maladaptive music listening coping (β = 0.429, p < 0.001) and a moderately significant direct effect on negative emotions of breakup (β = 0.318, p < 0.001).
There was a moderately significant positive correlation between the serum MGO levels and the TNF-α and hsCRP levels (r = 0.67 and r = 0.68, respectively, p < 0.001).
Additionally, the interaction between microwave power and ultrasound power ( X 1 X 3 ) was moderately significant (F = 28.29, p < 0.001).
According to Table 6 , a positive and moderately significant correlation was observed between GDA and TE (** p < .001, r > .50).
Interestingly, both Procrustes and Mantel analyses identified a moderately significant relationship between the two datasets (Procrustes correlation = 0.73, p = 0.001 and Mantel test r = 0.69, p = 0.001), suggesting both communities influence each other during regeneration.