“nearly significant”

Analysis of sleep efficiency data revealed an interaction effect between night and light intervention group that was nearly significant ( F (4, 124) = 2.44, p =0.050, η p 2 = 0.073).

es aged 60 to 69, there was a significant negative correlation (rho = -0.345, p = 0.031) between P300 latency and DHEA levels; (4) in females aged 50 to 59, IGFBP-3 was significantly (rho = -0.239, p = 0.040) negatively associated with prolonged P300 latency; (5) In females aged 40 to 69, there was nearly significant (rho = -0.170, p = 0.050) negative correlation between DHEA levels and P300 latency.

There was also a nearly significant interaction of Synchrony × Task (F 1,24 = 4.22, p = 0.05, η2 p = 0.15, power: 0.51).

These exploratory analyses showed a significant ( p < .001) and nearly significant effect ( p < .05) of treatment duration on outcome for the CGAS and the HoNOSCA with Cohen's d effect sizes of .30 and .23, respectively.

After controlling for task format, the group difference in discounting reached statistical significance ( F 1,51 = 3.70, p = 0.030, η p 2 = 0.068); the group difference was nearly significant when the two MA users who met criteria for cannabis dependence were excluded from analyses ( F 1,49 = 2.81, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.054).

The difference in peak loading was nearly significant between the RWB group and PWB group: p = 0.05.

The sex distribution between control (type PD) and hybrid (type HD) crosses is nearly significant (chi-square 6.00, DF = 2, P = 0.050), yet the difference is minor, given that all crosses are dominated by males.

Peptides significantly reduced skin roughness, with a nearly significant MD of −8.47 ( p = 0.05).

The test results revealed no significant differences between the MSBT and conventional groups; however, hip abductor volitional activity and trunk flexor volitional activity were nearly significant (p = 0.05).

Furthermore, there was a nearly significant and negative correlation between resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin and teicoplanin (Pearson’s r= -0.10, P = 0.05).

Furthermore, in the PSQI model, I<O and group had a nearly significant interaction effect (β=−0.13, P =0.050; Supplementary Table 1 ).

GSP mice showed a significant improvement at week 14 ( p < 0.05) and nearly significant improvement at week 15 ( p = 0.05) before their decline began at week 16, reaching significance at week 18 ( p = 0.006).

Additionally, we observed PE(16:0/22:6) ( Supporting Figure 5H ), which was nearly significant ( p = 0.05) ( Supporting Figure 6H ).

Also at the beginning of the study, the median sIgE value in response to rMal d 1 was 0.99 kU/L (range 0.04–94.60 kU/L) The patients showed a significant decrease of the median sIgE in response to Bet v 1 (10.60 to 5.19 kU/L; p = 0.01) and a nearly significant decrease of sIgE in response to rMal d 1 (0.99 to 0.61 kU/L; p = 0.05) after 2 years of BP-AIT ( Figure 2 ).

Post-hoc t -tests (Bonferroni-corrected) found that PLF of the RH tangential dipole was significantly reduced in SZ ( t [32] = 2.80, p < 0.05), while the PLF reduction of the LH radial dipole in SZ was nearly significant ( t [32] = 2.73, p = 0.050).

Evaluating nETV1 expression in AC tumors with multivariate analysis, a nearly significant (p=0.05; RR 0.47, 0.22-1.00) decrease of 53% in risk in OS for patients with high nETV1 expression could be found (Table 4 ).

First, the P value is really nearly significant (P=0.05).

For all three time periods, before-after decreases in hospitalization rates were significant for TNH patients, while before-after increases were insignificant for CNH patients; differences in the before-after trend for TNH relative to CNH patients, after adjusting for other hospitalization risk factors, were either significant or nearly significant at p = .05.

The difference between group 1 and 3 was nearly significant ( t w (28.9) = −2.09, p = 0.05) and the ratio in group 3 was significantly higher than that in group 2 ( t w (40) = 3.20, p < 0.01).

Multivariate analysis showed that the MD of medial EOMs and disease duration were significant indicators for predicting the active phase ( p = 0.035, 0.010; respectively), and the FA of medial EOMs demonstrated a nearly significant result ( p = 0.05).

However, those detected by observer 2 were nearly significant ( p =0.05).

28.1 ± 15.2, respectively; p = 0.08), and nearly significant lower Inhibin B level was found in the HPA group (68.1 ± 36.8 vs. 89.4 ± 46.1, respectively; p = 0.05).

NICU-like) × 3 [Injection: Non-injected v control virus v hM4D(Gi)] ANOVA revealed there was no significant main effect of condition F (1, 39) = 0.01521, p = 0.9025, or injection F (2, 39) = 1.004, p = 0.3758, there was a nearly significant interaction between condition and injection F (2, 39) = 3.233, p = 0.0502.

If self- and non-self- reports were tested separately for the effect of study characteristics (one characteristic at a time), a significant effect was found only in self-reports for year when survey was conducted (k = 7, b = −0.1425±0.0519, P = 0.006) and a nearly significant effect was found again in self-reports for survey delivery method (k = 7, b = −1.2496±0.6382, P = 0.0502) Sensitivity analysis Self-report admission rates varied between 1.65% -following the removal of Kalichman and Friedman (1992) [35] - and 2.93% -following the removal of Martinson et al.

Whole blood stimulation with heat-killed Spn yielded nearly significant increased IL-6 production in WT LRTI children compared with healthy children ( P = 0.0502).