Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,280 sentences · 3,280 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Importantly, the KA+MI 120 mg group displayed similar learning dynamics: in addition to a significant difference in mean escape latency between day 1 and 4, there was a significant reduction in the latency period on day 4 relative to day 2 ( p = 0.03) and a nearly significant reduction on day 3 relative to day 1 ( p = 0.06).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In the second session, we observed a nearly significant relation between Stimulus Intensity, Attention Condition and Individual Training Time for the post-post2 group, F (1,11) = 4.4, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.28, but we found no relation between Individual Training Time and Stimulus Intensity when separate tests were performed per attention condition ( p > 0.35).
nearly significantP =.061.2× alphagold
Compared to the control group, the best effectiveness of the intervention group was seen in the awe round, in which the increase in SWB was significant (N=171, t169=2.51, Cohen d=0.39, 95% CI 0.10-0.82, P =.01), and players who colored all 4 pictures had nearly significant improvements in SWB (N=171, F4,170=2.34, partial ŋ2=0.053, P =.06) and a significant decrease in anxiety (N=171, F4,170=3.39, partial ŋ2=0.075, P =.01).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
This finding is in relation with the lower Cobb angle found for the progressive subjects compared to the stable ones (nearly significant difference, p = 0.06), and is in agreement with that recently observed by our group in a previous study ( Barba et al., 2021 ).
nearly significantp = .061.2× alphagold
As we had already reported in our previous paper [ 19 ], there was a significant decrease in need satisfaction for belonging, F (1,14) = 19.64, p = .001, η p 2 = .58, self-esteem, F (1,14) = 4.89, p = .04, η p 2 = .26, and control, F (1,14) = 7.21, p = .02, η p 2 = .34, and a nearly significant reduction for meaningful existence, F (1,14) = 4.12, p = .06, η p 2 = .23, after exclusion in the Cyberball group.
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The latter study simply gave ticagrelor to patients with any LoF alleles and reported a nearly significant reduction in MACE (4.0% vs. 5.9%; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.43–1.02]; p = 0.06), but the investigators noted that many subjects received newer-generation stents and had lower-than-anticipated event rates, which was not accounted for in their power calculation.
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
As shown in Table 2 , the mild hyponatremia group also had more cases of sarcopenia, weaker GS, slower WS, shorter OLS time, and higher GDS-15 score. ANCOVA showed that mild hyponatremia had a significant effect on SMI ( F [1, 2393) = 4.2; p = 0.04), GS ( F [1, 1951] = 6.6; p = 0.01), WS ( F [1, 672] = 11.9; p = 0.001), and GDS-15 score ( F [1, 2883] = 9.7; p = 0.002) after controlling for covariates, and a nearly significant effect on OLS time ( F [1, 2527] = 3.6; p = 0.06) (Table 3 ).
nearly significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
This means a nearly significant ( P = 0.06) association of fever with this pathogen (3 of 18 [16.7%; 95% CI 3.6–41.4%] A. phagocytophilum -infected tick-bitten humans presenting with fever, whereas only 5 out of 126 [4%; 95% CI 1.3–9%] with symptoms relating to other tick-borne pathogens).