“not quite significant”

T2DM was significantly more prevalent in patients with LOAD than in control subjects ( p < 0.0001), while the difference was not quite significant for hypertension ( p = 0.085).

(F) Very significant effect of reboxetine [ F (1,23) = 9.95, p = 0.0044], not quite significant effect of caffeine [ F (1,23) = 3.23, p = 0.0857], and no interaction [ F (1,23) = 0.00, p = 0.9612].

The three-way generation x phase × time interaction was not quite significant, F (4,102) = 2.102, p = .086, η p 2 = 0.076.

While the difference in PC1 was not quite significant (p = 0.086), the difference in PC2 was significant (p = 0.037).

Differences which were not quite significant were also observed between benign and high-grade OC patients in the LRT (Fig. 4 B, unweighted UniFrac, p = 0.087), ovaries (Fig. 4 F, Bray–Curtis, p = 0.067) and urine (Fig. 4 J, Bray–Curtis, p = 0.056).

There was still some enhancing effect of PT on day 21 post-treatment, though this was not quite significant (P = 0.087 vs.

The decrease in V1b (from 0.157 to 0.135) was not quite significant (χ 2 = 872,130, unadjusted P = 0.0878); the same applied to PM (decrease from 0.167 to 0.152, χ 2 = 22,091, unadjusted P = 0.0737).

Although not quite significant, there was also some evidence for an improvement in OS (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.39-1.07]; P = .088).

The interaction between Task and Audience was not quite significant (F(1,31)=3.11; p=0.088; η p 2 =.091). 3.2 fMRI Results 3.2.1 Definition of the relational-integration network In the first step of analysis, we defined the relational-integration network as the areas activated in the main effect of Task (Relational>Control), combined across age groups.

This trend was also observed in food-restricted individuals, but the interaction term was not quite significant (p = 0.089) ( Table 2 ).

The GLMM analysis of fixed effects revealed significant effects due to insecticide ( F 1,13.75 = 11.34, p = 0.0047), not quite significant effects due to dispenser density ( F 1,13.76 = 3.33, p = 0.0896), and no significant interaction ( F 1,24.59 = 0.42, p = 0.52). → For the experiment from 2012 to 2014, percent navel orangeworm damage in mating disruption plots was, respectively, 1.6 ± 0.57 and 1.1 ± 0.39 for half and full label concentration mating disruption from 5 dispensers per ha in the absence of insecticide treatments.

Both trials were terminated early and were underpowered, but if combined, overall mortality in CCP‐treated participants was 14 of 94, compared to 23 of 93 in controls, a 40% reduction, which, while not quite significant at the 0.05 level ( p = 0.09), cannot be dismissed in the face of an epidemic.

Hepatic Encephalopathy Most (72.5%) AA patients did not have HE; more non-Hispanic Caucasian patients (60.2%) had HE, though the difference was not quite significant ( p = 0.09).

( 2016 ) was not quite significant ( p = 0.09).

The difference between the sign learners and the fluent signers was not quite significant ( z = 2.08, p = 0.09).

The ANOVA revealed a significant effect of cannula placement ( F 1,21 = 14.44; p < 0.001) and drug treatment ( F 4,84 = 9.01; p < 0.001) but the interaction was not quite significant ( F 4,84 = 2.05; p = 0.09).

The model predicting worst pruritus intensity at the 6MFU was not quite significant (F(4,21) = 2.25, p = 0.09).

The association of dating experience with individual-level collectivism was not quite significant, r = -.14, p >. 09.

Group differences in perceptions of personal relevance were not quite significant, F (2, 182) = 2.41, p = .09, partial η 2 = .03.

Within the 48-h follow-up period, HP improved the mouse survival compared with the survival of the LPS control group, although the difference was not quite significant (Figure 2D ; P = 0.0911, using the Mantel–Cox log rank test).

VLP containing all three proteins induced a significantly higher response to the glycoprotein components compared to Z+GPC VLP, with a 15 fold overall increase in titer against both GP1 and GP2, despite a not quite significant statistical difference in the GP2 titers (p = 0.092).

When broad set retrocopies were removed, the extent of the SNP depletion in intronless gene ESEs was ≈14.2%, a much greater effect size than for the full set although still not quite significant ( P ≈ 0.092, one-tailed from empirical simulation).

Though not quite significant ( P = 0.093), the numbers of hours studied decreased again at 12 months (5.1 ± 2.1 h [median = 5 h]).

The fold increase in cells was significantly higher for passage 2 RPCs at day 7 ( p < 0.01, n = 6 for passage 2, and n = 7 for passage 6), but not quite significant for day 3 ( P = 0.093).

However, the difference between slopes measured by a Student’s t -test was not quite significant ( p = 0.093).