“not quite significant”

However, when we explored the valves only of all 226 shunts of this study the result was not quite significant, but we found a tendency that the type of the valve may make a difference ( p = 0.077) (Fig. 2 d).

In accordance, the time with oxygen saturation <90% (T90) showed significant correlation with hs-CRP levels (r s = 0.245, p = 0.028), and the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) showed a strong but not quite significant correlation with hs-CRP (r s = 0.198, p = 0.079).

Although here the proprioceptive shifts during error-clamp adaptation (Exp 2) were tiny, and not quite significant (p<0.08), the reports are relative to the actual location of the passively placed unseen hand, measured in trials separate from those with reach adaptation and therefore there is no visual target to anchor their estimates to.

The day 21 group was not quite significant ( P = 0.08) because of higher IgM levels in the control group.

Profiles 1 (Dysexecutive/Low Functioning) and 3 (Low Psychosocial Functioning) were rated to have the most severe neuropsychiatric symptoms on the NPI-Q, although Profile 3 scores were not quite significantly different from Profiles 2 and 4 ( p = .08, p = .12), likely due to small sample sizes.

Reported attacks of malaria had no effect on BP-S; however, those reporting an attack of typhoid (often as “typhoid-malaria”) had lower median BP-S (117 versus 126) but this is not quite significant at the 0.05 level ( p = 0.08, one-way ANOVA, F = 3.04, and df = 332), and reports of other illnesses had no statistical significance.

In contrast, the association between qHBsAg level (log 10 U/mL) and ALT ( P < 0.001) was weaker, not quite significant with APRI ( P = 0.08), and in the opposite direction with FIB‐4 ( P = .01), with a higher HBsAg level associated with a lower odds of a higher FIB‐4 category (Supporting Fig.

The meta-analysis of CRP involved a much larger total sample than TwinsUK, and the present study finds only suggestive evidence of association, with CRP levels being higher in CWP cases, but the test of association is not quite significant ( p < 0.08).

18 ) but in a test for such interaction, adjusting for “without radon” covariates, and also adjusting for quartiles of cumulative DEMS_REC1 lagged 15 years, the interaction term was not quite significant ( p = 0.08) and, more importantly, tests for an effect of REC exposure appeared to be little impacted by whether or not smoking was entered as a main effect and in an interaction term or only as a main effect.

Leaf temperature was higher with (UV+) than without (UV-) UV radiation, but this difference was not quite significant (p = 0.08; Table S4 ; Figure 3a ).

Two-way ANOVA (drug treatment X lactation state) of these data determined there were significant main effects of both drug treatment [F(1,88) = 10.75; p <0.01] and lactation state [F(2,88) = 6.079; p <0.01], but the interaction between the two factors was not quite significant [F(2,88) = 2.507; p = 0.08].

dirus between the two villages, even before the introduction of the intervention, resulted in higher initial estimated prevalence rates in Ou Chra compared to Pu Cha although these were not quite significant (4/126 compared to 2/285 Fishers exact test p = 0.08).

The main effect of nouns was not quite significant, F 1(1, 64) = 3.08, p = 0.08, F 2(1, 29) = 1.56, p = 0.22, although the pattern observed in Experiments 1A, 1B, and 2A appeared once again, with shorter reading times when there were more nouns.

The analysis confirmed a main effect of group, F (1, 22) = 24.00, p < .001, η p 2 = .52, and of block, F (1.5, 33.2) = 5.55, p = .014, η p 2 = .20, and an interaction that was not quite significant ( p = .08).

However, the overall meta-analysis was not quite significant (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.03, P = 0.08).

Feelings of sufficient time were negatively but not quite significantly correlated with feelings of limited agency and budget (τ = −0.160, P = 0.080 and τ = −0.167, P = 0.076, respectively).

Univariate linear regression analysis with P28 refractive error as the outcome variable and FDM (versus control) as the predictor variable, showed that if a P14 GP underwent 2 weeks of FDM, at P28 the refractive error was on average 1.85D more myopic than that in GPs undergoing physiological growth; this difference was not quite significant statistically ( P = 0.081, n = 70).

The main effect of genotype was not quite significant ( p = 0.0814); however, a trend of increased hemosiderin staining in APPPS1:E4 is visualized in Figure 3 E, as APPPS1:E3 mice exhibited little spontaneous microhemorrhage compared to APPPS1:E4 mice. 2.3.

The apparent association increased post-intervention for both contaminants, and the association became significant for Pb (X 2 of 9.75 and p = 0.002), but the association for A S was not quite significant (X 2 of 4.61 and p = 0.082).

In general, the mean time of negativization for the vaccinated was 11.07 ± 6.33 days (median value 10) compared to that of the unvaccinated 16.77± 8.87 days (median value 13), which is not quite significant ( p = 0.082) ( Figure 3 ).

However, there was also a significant interaction of disease and acute treatment on expression of IL-1β [ F (3,13) = 70.49, p < .0001] and TNFα [ F (3,13) = 16.76, p = .0013], whereas that for IFN-β was not quite significant [ F (3,13) = 3.54, p = .0825].

There is a close, but not quite significant, correlation ( r = 0.90, P = 0.083) between PRNFL swelling/atrophy and VEP amplitude loss.

Interestingly, left NAcc showed relatively reduced activation during the Aversive Emotion Task ( M / SD = −4.14/23.89) compared to the Neutral Task ( M / SD = 2.08/20.73); however, the difference in activation was not quite significant ( F (1,65) = 3.10, p = 0.083, n p 2 = 0.045).

Multivariate analyses Nested analyses on the 4 chick level datasets showed a highly significant effect of box on chick enterobacterial load ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 11.4, P < 0.001), chick total bacteria ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 41, P < 0.001) and chick weight ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 7.97, P < 0.001), while box effect on chick fungal load was not quite significant ( N = 44, F 20,21 = 1.86, P = 0.083).

Male sex showed a strong but not quite significant correlation with liver fibrosis (OR = 7.67, p = 0.085).