Barely Significant
← all phrases

not quite significant

634 sentences · 634 papers · 6,904 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=.11

Reported by Matthew Hankins, whose collection is the reason this phrase is on the list.

In the literature

not quite significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
where P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance [...] was found to be slightly smaller than that of basal cells (−181 ± 21 pA, n = 7, P27–P30) but the difference was not quite significant (P = 0.05)” (PMID 18174213) “... resting activity of A5 neurons was marginally but not significantly higher in toxin-treated rats (0.9 ± 0.2vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 Hz, P = 0.068)” (PMID 22526887) “... significantly smaller than with fura-6F alone (P = 0.009), and slightly smaller than with fura-6F and EGTA (
not quite significantP = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Though not quite significant, there were trends towards higher insoluble UFSP2 levels in the temporal cortex of AD patients compared to controls ( P = 0.050), and towards higher levels of insoluble UFM1 in the temporal cortex of AD patients, which also approached significance ( P = 0.062) (Table 1 ).
The UFMylation pathway is impaired in Alzheimer's disease.
Mol Neurodegener · 2024 · PMC11656649
not quite significantP <0.051.0× alphagold
The cloned Dw3 locus on chromosome 7 is tagged using three different methods Chromosome 7, which contains the known, cloned target Dw3 at 58.6 Mb, has a peak introgression frequency at 58.7 Mb, a peak F st at 58.6 Mb, and a peak plant height association at 58.2 Mb that is not quite significant at P <0.05 following a Bonferonni correction (Figure 3 ).
not quite significantp = 0.05081.0× alphagold
In addition to significantly reduced paralysis scores, the Jun11695- treated group also had significantly increased weight compared to control animals ( p = 0.001 repeated measures ANOVA), and the Jun11787- treated group also had increased weight, though it was not quite significant compared to controls ( p = 0.0508, repeated measures ANOVA) (Fig. 5b ).
not quite significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
However, there was a large, though not quite significant, negative effect (monte‐carlo p = 0.051) in contralesional hemisphere areas similar to those identified at the first visit associated with change in MoCA score, suggesting those who had not yet recruited the contralesional hemisphere may have potential to do so and improve. 3.2.