“not quite significant”

Because of the relatively small number of Medicaid patients without a USC, this increase is not quite significant ( P = 0.06).

However, a t test between the next lowest (Nano S&T) and the most Integrative (Chemistry, Multidisciplinary) is not quite significant ( p = 0.06).

Young healthy adults had higher median VRTs than controls for both hyper- and hypoxic tests, which were not quite significant (p = 0.06 and p = 0.07, respectively).

Although not quite significant (p = 0.06), cricket-fed spiders had the lowest MiSp relative to actin ( Fig 2D ).

Similarly, the percentage of tidal volume entering the LR lung region tended to be greater in kittens exposed to negative compared to positive external pressures, although this difference was not quite significant (33.4 ± 1.8 vs. 24.5 ± 2.9%; P = 0.060; Figure 3 ).

While this effect was not quite significant with two-sided testing ( p = 0.06) in Experiment 2, it would be justified to perform a one-sided test given the strong expectations derived from Experiment 1 and the literature.

Again, 2hG was not quite significant ( P = 0.06).

The three-way interaction between the first and second treatments and which eyestalk was groomed was not quite significant (F 1,68 = 3.75, p = 0.06, Figure 2 ).

Yet, this difference was not quite significant ( p = 0.06; Table 3 ).

The effect of model was not quite significant (F(2,72) = 3.0, P<0.06).

Both, young girls and adult women were judged to be significantly more attractive than circum-menopausal women (both p < .001), whereas the difference in attractiveness ratings between young girls and adult women was not quite significant ( p = .06).

Although EtOH-treated sapje mutant zebrafish trended towards having more muscle degeneration, the interaction was not quite significant ( Figure 6 E, p = 0.06). 4.

While plgg1 - 1 had a larger Γ * (~25 %), this difference was not quite significant as determined by a Student's t test ( p = 0.06).

The effect of water content on leaf toughness was not quite significant (0.5573, p = 0.06), but its removal did not improve the model.

While the main effect of stimulus was not quite significant for the VL ( p = 0.06), when counts from the CM, VL and brachium were combined there was a significant effect of stimulus (F [2,25] = 4.18; p = 0.04), with more Fos-IR neurons elicited by Q as compared to W ( p = 0.01).

The slight increase in reporting this approach is not quite significant at the 0.05 level ( p = 0.06), so we cannot be confident that it is due to real differences between the populations of teachers.

Both male and female maternal obesity offspring showed a ∼10% reduction in the 90th percentile lifespan, which was statistically significant for males (p < 0.006), but not quite significant for females (p = 0.06).

Relative to the no treatment group, AmB treatment increased median survival of larvae by two days ( p = 0.013), while the one-day increase in median survival observed for BS-181-treatment compared to no treatment was not quite significant ( p = 0.06).

Tissue levels of IL-6 appeared to be higher in the hCD16 + Ms group although this was not quite significant ( p = 0.06).

In addition, Bhlhe41 mRNA levels trended towards an increase that was not quite significant (15% upregulated p = 0.06) ( Fig 6 ).

Among AEMC patients treated with higher average powers > 12 W, the fragment-free rate was 51% vs 32% for the lower-power group, which was not quite significant ( P = .06).

The omnibus ANOVA analysis of the embodiment main effect revealed a not quite significant ( p < 0.06) effect in the data F (1, 54) = 3.87, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.07, such that participants tended to perseverate at the SAR task for a longer duration with a physical coach ( M = 936.28 s, SE = 117.86 s) compared to a live-video coach ( M = 699.94 s, SE = 89.87 s).

A two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of CDP [ F (1, 28) = 7.66, p = 0.0099], a significant effect of L-701,324 [ F (1, 28) = 9.65, p < 0.0043] and not quite significant interaction [ F (1, 28) = 3.83, p = 0.0603] in the time spent in open arms, while a significant effect of CDP [ F (1, 28) = 7.25, p = 0.0118], no effect of L-701,324 [ F (1, 28) = 1.09, p = 0.3056] and not quite significant interaction [ F (1, 28) = 3.77, p = 0.0622] in the open arm entries.

Smoking was 16.5% more frequent in the immunotherapy + cannabis (56.9%) group than the immunotherapy-only group (40.4%), but this difference was not quite significant (χ 2 (1) = 3.512, p = 0.0609, Figure 1 B). 3.2.

Adding year to this temperature model resulted in a not quite significant improvement (p = 0.061), explaining 47% of the variation.