“not significantly significant”

The expression of three miRNAs (miR156, miR157, and miR172) was up regulated in response to increasing aluminum nanoparticle exposure, but these fold changes in expression were not significantly significant (p>0.05) ( Figure 2 ).

Patients in the lower adherence group had significantly higher levels of education ( P = 0.021), whereas the P values of other demographic variables; gender, age, smoking status, place of residence, and monthly income were not significantly significant ( P > 0.05).

18 However, the observer reported good to excellent (>50%) improvement was 15% in the TAC alone group and 40% in the TAC + 5‐FU group which was not significantly significant. 18 Our study showed significant reduction in the VSS score in the combination group compared to the TAC alone group ( p < 0.05).

Compared with the positive control culture system of human BM-MSCs as the trophoblast under the same conditions, the number of cells cocultured at 1, 2, and 4 weeks was not significantly significant ( p > 0.05, n = 5).

The average value for the muscle activity of the latissimus dorsi increased, but the difference was not significantly significant, although there was a statistically significant increase in the maximum value (p<0.05).

In sensitivity analyses with previous VR experience recoded as a binary variable, the interaction terms were not significantly significant in models with perceived restorativeness or in models with negative affect, p > 0.05.

Results Before treatment, SNCV and MNCV were not significantly significant ( P > 0.05), but after treatment, SNCV and MNCV were significantly higher, and the MMAE group changed more significantly ( P < 0.05); before treatment, MAAS and TCSS scores were not significant ( P > 0.05), but after treatment, MAAS scores were significantly higher, TCSS scores were significantly l

While each group also shows significant dishabituation (p<0.0001, Tukey's test for both genotypes), manifested as increased sniffing to a novel olfactory probe (vanilla extract) as compared to the last habituation trial, the main effect of genotype was not significantly significant (F 1,5 = 0.39, p>0.05).

Mean values of MCV & MCH has increased when compared with control but not significantly significant (p > 0.05).

However, the difference between age groups was not significantly significant ( p >0.05) (see Table 1 ).

For CerG, the total chain length was from 40 to 42 while only CerG2 with 42 carbon atoms showed an increasing trend in CA, although it was not significantly significant ( P > 0.05) (Figure S3F).

However, the difference was not significantly significant (all with P > 0.05) (see Table 3 ). 3.4.

However, at lower concentrations 1.25-2.5 μg/mL, the inhibition was not significantly significant (p > 0.05) compared to the control and hence the IC 50 value was not calculated.

Although patients had higher LYM counts in severe COVID-19 group than critical group, the differences was not significantly significant (P > 0.05).

Gray-scale US features of TNs, such as location, microcalcification, were also different between the benign and malignant groups, but this difference was not significantly significant (all P>0.05).

Result The T1 and T2 MAP levels in the observation group were lower than those in the control group ( P < 0.05), and the difference between T3 and the control group was not significantly significant ( P > 0.05).

Comparing the change in the CK level at POD 1 between the cervical and lumbar cases, the mean difference in the CK change between the preoperative and POD 1 CK values was 450.08 U/L for the cervical group and 811.25 U/L for the lumbar group; however, this difference was not significantly significant ( p =0.052).

Compared with the control group, only the difference in the volume of blood transfusion was not significantly significant between the two groups ( P = 0.052), while the rest of the observation indicators were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group ( P < 0.001 for all).

Although the difference between the 0.5 copy and NSDC was not significantly significant, the p -value was only slightly higher than the threshold ( p ≈ 0.06), which is a promising result for such an extremely low copy number (<1 copy/μL).

Subgroup analysis showed that the patients with anisometropic amblyopia had a significantly thicker choroid as compared to the fellow healthy eyes ( P = 0.00), whereas in strabismic amblyopic eyes, this difference was not significantly significant ( P = 0.064).

For SCD the dip was not significantly significant for face 3, approached significance for face 25 ( p = 7%) and was highly significant for remaining faces.

According to the univariate analysis, the difference in OS between the SBRT and MWA groups was not significantly significant (P=0.071), although, after IPTW adjustment, a substantially significant difference was noted between the two groups (P<0.001; Table IV ).

The log 2 fold change in ACAT1 expression with GC treatment showed a greater increase in SSNS versus SRNS, although the difference was not significantly significant ( P = 0.0721) ( Figure 7 b).

Although this difference was present in the random effects model (combination therapy: 75.0, monotherapy: 45.7), the p value of the test of subgroup differences was not significantly significant ( p = 0.0782), probably because there was excessive heterogeneity in each subgroup ( I 2 > 70%) (Figure 5 ).

Wound complications The prevalence of wound complications was not significantly significant; nine studies saw a pooled estimated SMD of 0.49 (95% CI 0.22, 1.10; P = 0.08) (Figure 7 ).