“not strictly significant”

An extended analysis on these two SNPs provided some promising but not strictly significant results, and we reported them in the Supplementary Material for the interest of readers.

26:50 mm:ss in the consultation group, with a statistically significant difference of 8:24 mm:ss (95% CI: 1:17–15:31), although this was not strictly significant in the corresponding per-protocol analysis ( Table 3 ).

Even though not strictly significant, we also observed trends for genetic correlations with other brain volumetric measures.

Others proposed the association of solely ABCB1 rs1128503 (OR = 2.02, p = 0.401) with global toxicity, or of ABCB1 rs1045642 with early toxicity (OR = 3.79, p = 0.098) (not strictly significant), while others did not find any association at all [ 74 , 93 , 95 , 96 ].

A direct comparison of the CD8 + T-cell response against E1 from Ii-E1E2E6E7 and E1E2E6E7 (Mann-Whitney rank-sum) revealed a p-value of 0.06, which is not strictly significant, but strongly indicates a tendency of Ii improving the magnitude of CD8 + T-cells against E1.

Essentially the same effect was found in both the multivariable analysis (10-year follow-up) and univariable analysis (25-year follow-up), but these findings were not strictly significant.

As expected, the anti-herding behaviour on non-expiration days is clearly detected, as is a positive linear relationship between dispersion measures and market returns, although this relationship is not strictly significant at the usual 10% confidence level.

Although not strictly significant, the negative control item appears marginally significant from the CI - is this concerning to the authors about the interpretation of the primary outcome?

They found that the mean IMT increased in proportion to the severity of PD in the normotensive group, but the increase was not strictly significant in the hypertensive group.

In Buryats egalitarian behavior toward friends decreased, whereas altruistic increased with age, however this effect was not strictly significant (statistical trend).

As for the term of no shared border , its parameter is not strictly significant for most of the inferred networks.

However, this result, while not strictly significant, shows a trend toward statistical significance, which may be clinically meaningful and warrants further consideration.

Our findings, though not strictly significant, also suggest potential disruptions in other FC networks in DLB patients with depressive symptoms.

While not strictly significant, there are variables that show moderate effect sizes and should not be dismissed, especially in exploratory or applied research contexts.

Although not strictly significant due to the small sample size, this trend aligns with our METAFlux analysis.

Tensile strength was lower ( p = .035), while pentosidine was higher ( p = .006) in donors with CKD than donors without kidney disease, but the difference in strength ( p = .055) and pentosidine ( p = .151) were not strictly significant when adjusting for covariates.

The difference in the RESCUE-ESE density between IN-PS and CR-E/DN-E or CR-I/DN-I was not strictly significant, which was partly attributable to a low number of these signals in Y-rich sequences upstream of 3′ss.