Barely Significant
← all phrases

of borderline significance

1,678 sentences · 1,678 papers · 11,068 search hits before verification

In the literature

of borderline significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
In the sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with angiographically verified coronary status (CAG group, n = 94), the overlap-weighted association between CAD and mortality was greater and of borderline significance (weighted HR 2.99, 95% CI 0.95–9.47; p = 0.062, Figure 4 ). 4.
of borderline significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
In subgroup analyses, Beijing strains only had a significant association with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (aOR 6.1; 1.2–30.4), and an association of borderline significance with polyresistant tuberculosis (aOR 1.8; 1.0–3.5; p = 0.062), among individuals born in the Western Pacific.
of borderline significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
However, although there was a statistically significant further decline in depressive symptoms as measured by the MADRAS when the eight participants were included in the analysis [ F (1, 7) = 7.692; p = 0.028], the decline on the MADRAS was only of borderline significance when only the seven completers were included [ F (1, 6) = 5.250; p = 0.062].
of borderline significancep=0.0621.2× alpha
In a model that included cognitive ability, conscientiousness, household wealth, health literacy as well as age and sex, the association between cognitive function and participation in screening became of borderline significance (p=0.062), while that between conscientiousness and participation in screening was attenuated to non-significance (p=0.190).
of borderline significanceP = 0.06221.2× alpha
The associations between per 2-fold increases in circulating levels of C16:0 and C18:0 with risk of incident AD were of borderline significance with HRs (95% CIs) of 1.6 (1.0–2.6) ( P = 0.0622) and 1.6 (0.9–2.7) ( P = 0.0926), respectively.
of borderline significanceP = 0.0631.3× alpha
The results of the dichotomous analysis indicated that the relative changes in TNF-α concentrations were statistically different between the two groups, with less increase and more decrease in the supplemented group (P = 0.018) ( Figure 3 ), while the change in IL-1 was of borderline significance (P = 0.063), with more increase and less decrease in the values in the supplemented group.