of borderline significanceP = 0.061
Age, BMI and the SNP panel RR together yielded an AUC of 0.7007, which was of borderline significance compared to age alone ( P = 0.061).
Age, BMI and the SNP panel RR together yielded an AUC of 0.7007, which was of borderline significance compared to age alone ( P = 0.061).
Whereas fractional anisotropy did not differ, mean diffusivity was significantly increased in all grey matter regions of interest of symptomatic mutation carriers except right thalamus and left caudate, where the increase was of borderline significance ( P = 0.061 and P = 0.075, respectively).
The associations for HIV status and sexual contact with women were of borderline significance ( P = 0.061 and P = 0.063, respectively) (Table 4 ).
Levels of both genes also appeared to be higher in SPL rather than PNIL choriodecidua, but these differences were of borderline significance ( p = 0.061, 0.057).
The difference between the IS of the SIM+ASA2+DIP and ASA2+DIP groups was of borderline significance ( P = 0.061; Fig. 1 ).
Table 5 shows an association between PA and lower TC/HDL-C ratio of borderline significance (p = 0.061) (Model 1).
Personal carbon black exposure and PLAAS concentration were positively associated (p < 0.01), whereas an association between personal PM(2.5) exposure and PLAAS was only of borderline significance (p = 0.061).
In the sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with angiographically verified coronary status (CAG group, n = 94), the overlap-weighted association between CAD and mortality was greater and of borderline significance (weighted HR 2.99, 95% CI 0.95–9.47; p = 0.062, Figure 4 ). 4.
In subgroup analyses, Beijing strains only had a significant association with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (aOR 6.1; 1.2–30.4), and an association of borderline significance with polyresistant tuberculosis (aOR 1.8; 1.0–3.5; p = 0.062), among individuals born in the Western Pacific.
The use of bevacizumab in second or later lines remained of borderline significance in the multivariable model (HR 0.69; p = 0.062) ( Table 5 ). 4.
However, although there was a statistically significant further decline in depressive symptoms as measured by the MADRAS when the eight participants were included in the analysis [ F (1, 7) = 7.692; p = 0.028], the decline on the MADRAS was only of borderline significance when only the seven completers were included [ F (1, 6) = 5.250; p = 0.062].
The difference between patients with GD and patients with inactive GO was of borderline significance ( p = 0.062).
This was observed at the 24-month followup ( p = 0.006) and at the 48-month followup, although the difference at 48 months was of borderline significance ( p = 0.062).
In a model that included cognitive ability, conscientiousness, household wealth, health literacy as well as age and sex, the association between cognitive function and participation in screening became of borderline significance (p=0.062), while that between conscientiousness and participation in screening was attenuated to non-significance (p=0.190).
We examined whether interactions existed between covariates by using multiple analysis in which age, gender, obesity, drinking, smoking, vaccine type, and follow-up time were covariates, and found an interaction of borderline significance ( p =0.062) only between the gender and vaccine type.
The associations between per 2-fold increases in circulating levels of C16:0 and C18:0 with risk of incident AD were of borderline significance with HRs (95% CIs) of 1.6 (1.0–2.6) ( P = 0.0622) and 1.6 (0.9–2.7) ( P = 0.0926), respectively.
An increased risk of contralateral breast cancer of borderline significance was found for patients who had genetic counseling versus those who had not (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.2, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.0–5.2, P = 0.063).
The results of the dichotomous analysis indicated that the relative changes in TNF-α concentrations were statistically different between the two groups, with less increase and more decrease in the supplemented group (P = 0.018) ( Figure 3 ), while the change in IL-1 was of borderline significance (P = 0.063), with more increase and less decrease in the values in the supplemented group.
Additionally, elevated MAPK8 expression was observed in tumors graded G1/G2, although this was of borderline significance ( p = 0.063).
Even at hospital discharge, this difference was of borderline significance [median 9.3 (7.9–11.6) vs. 8.4 (7.2–9.7) ng/mL; p = 0.063]. 4.
A breakdown analysis as a function of lesion grade showed a significantly higher expression of HJURP in stroma ( P = 0.031) and an expression of borderline significance ( P = 0.063) in tumor cells in patients with relapsed G1-2 lesions compared to disease-free cases.
There is an overall significant difference between the three groups ( χ 2 =7.494, df=2, P =0.024) and for groups 1 vs 2 ( z =−2.709, P =0.007), the difference between groups 2 and 3 is of borderline significance ( z =−1.857, P =0.063).
Management strategy was significantly different depending on the polyp location in all analyses ( P < 0.001); however, in the adjusted model for low risk polyps, rectal polyp was only of borderline significance in predicting different management strategies ( P = 0.063).
Nevertheless, the effect was of borderline significance (P value = 0.063).
17.9%); this difference was of borderline significance (P = 0.0631).