Barely Significant
← all phrases

only marginally significant

5,086 sentences · 5,086 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantp =.0571.1× alphagold
Exceptions were the appreciation of life subscale, where the quadratic terms were only marginally significant for the prediction of PTSD, β=−.14, p =.057, relating to others, where the quadratic term was marginally significant for depression, β=−.15, p =.08, and spiritual change, where the quadratic term did not predict PTSD symptom severities, β = −.02, p =.238.
only marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Indeed, the two participants who did not recover any global stereopsis had more severe amblyopia than the three participants who recovered, although this difference was only marginally significant (independent-samples one-tailed t -test t (3) = 2.22, p = 0.057, Hedge’s g = 2.02, BF10 = 1.37).
only marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
In the speech domain, which considers both sounds and words produced, the decreasing class had lower scores than the increasing class, and the medium/parabolic class had scores intermediate between the other two classes across all timepoints from 12 to 24 months [although differences between Classes 1 and 3 drop to only marginally significant ( p = 0.057) at the 15 month timepoint; see Supplementary Table S3 ].
only marginally significantP = 0.0571.1× alphagold
significantly smaller than with fura-6F alone (P = 0.009), and slightly smaller than with fura-6F and EGTA (P = 0.08).” (PMID 18832426) “The correlation becomes only marginally significant if the single experiment with the largest effect is removed (r = 0.41, P = 0.057, n = 22).” (PMID 17916607) Implied or gross spin (i.e. spin other than interpreting p-values between 0.05 and 0.1 as trends or statistically significant) was noted incidentally in papers before (n = 10) and after (n = 9) the editorial advice was published.
only marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Cortical state was comparable prior to Correct and Incorrect Choices: the difference was weak and only marginally significant (p = 0.057; Figure 3 F), and the probability of wheel turns in the Correct versus Incorrect directions appeared unrelated to low-frequency power ( Figure 3 G; p = 0.8, generalized linear mixed-effects model).