When both uncinate WMH and ILF WMH were entered into a model to predict cognition (independent of age, sex, and education), uncinate WMH remained significant ( p = 0.03) while ILF WMH was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
Interestingly, after adjustment for HIV− and CVD‐related risk factors, the prevalence ratios of coronary artery stenosis above 50% associated with each SD increase in values of IL‐6, hs‐CRP, and D‐dimer in our study were comparable to the hazard ratios reported in the SMART trial, 56 although the association of hs‐CRP with coronary artery stenosis was only marginally significant ( P =0.06) and the relationship of D‐dimer with coronary artery stenosis was not statistically significant.
This trend was weak and only marginally significant ( p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.14).
Though there appears to be variation between years in the proportion of sightings reported in a yard or neighborhood, with more sightings submitted in yards or neighborhood after 2020, this difference is only marginally significant (χ 2 = 5.6, p = 0.06, Fig 4A ).
Consistent with Hypothesis 3 (age-related reduction in adaptive sampling), the effect was only marginally significant in older adults, F (1, 39) = 3.63, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.09.
However, the interaction between instruction and stimulation was only marginally significant, F (1,19) = 3.99, p = .06, MSE = 1.24, η p 2 = .17.
The unilateral approach appears to decrease the likelihood of new fractures; however, this decrease is only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).
PSS: 20.79 kg/m2) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06 ), and the grip force (SSS: 411 N vs.
For example, the crucial interaction between the humanness of the emotion terms and conditions reported by Castano and Giner-Sorolla [ 48 ] is statistically significant in their Study 2 but only marginally significant in Study 1, reported as “ p <.06 ” (p. 808).
Furthermore, although the module-trait correlations in WGCNA were only marginally significant ( P = 0.06 and P = 0.07), downstream analyses, such as functional enrichment and immune cell association, strongly supported the relevance of these modules.
However, further pair-wise t-tests for the congruency effect per electrode site indicated that the congruency effect was only marginally significant at electrode sites PO6 (t(17) = 2.01, p = 0.06) and PO8 (t(17) = 1.78, p = 0.09).
HIV infection was the only marginally significant independent predictor of survival probability on the acute admission ward (hazards ratio 2.87, P = 0.06).
A total of 21.6% of the variance of metaphor comprehension was explained ( p < .04), with analogical reasoning being the variable with more weight at this age, although only marginally significant (β = .336, p < .06).
Wood consumption was higher in females (15.8±14.0%) than in males (5.2±3.6%), but this pattern was only marginally significant (SEX; χ 2 = 3.5, df = 1, P = 0.06).
The main effect of framing condition was only marginally significant ( z = −1.86, p = 0.06).
However, the association with EFS was only marginally significant ( P = 0.060).
When we re-ran the analysis and stratified by smoking status, the difference in VA-FI was only marginally significant in non-smokers ( Z = 1.89, p = 0.06; GW: 0.09 ± 0.09; non-GW: 0.10 ± 0.10) and insignificant in smokers ( Z = 1.04, p = 0.30; GW: 0.19 ± 0.11; non-GW: 0.21 ± 0.12; see Figure 2 ).
The same analyses were performed as for the OLP for these four parameters and showed only marginally significant effect of pre-post for VSA1m ( F (1,5) = 7.76; p = 0.06) and marginally significant effect of the session ∗ pre-post interaction ( F (7,42) = 2.2; p = 0.053).
RESULTS Error rates Speakers made more errors in reproducing sentences with weak bias verbs ( M = 0.36, SD = 0.48) than strong bias verbs ( M = 0.31, SD = 0.46), but the difference was only marginally significant (β = -0.25, SE = 0.13, z = -1.90, p = 0.06).
A chi-square test revealed that the four groups exhibited no significant differences in terms of sex (χ 2 = 1.95, p = 0.58) or grade taught (χ 2 = 1.88, p = 0.60) and only marginally significant differences in terms of whether they were head teachers (χ 2 = 7.58, p = 0.06).
When including alexithymia as a covariate (RM-MANCOVA), the affective priming effect was only marginally significant [congruence: F (1,30) = 3.8, p = 0.06].
The same students had an OR of 0.68 of reporting behavioural problems due to their drinking, but this effect was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).
While the difference between these two enrichments is only marginally significant (one-tailed Z -score P < 0.06), H3K27ac marks alone capture more variants than H3K27ac overlapping DHS variants (7.7% vs. 5.8%) but explains a smaller heritability fraction (44.3% vs. 48.8%) ( Fig. 6 C; Supplemental Fig.
Participants gave more correct responses in neutral problems than in imaginable (92% vs 86%), even though this effect of imaginability was only marginally significant, F (1, 29) = 3.832; η 2 = .117; p = .06.
The results indicate that the concentration difference between the filtered and unfiltered effluent samples is highly significant ( p < 0.01) for the medium sand and glass bead experiments, but only marginally significant ( p = 0.06) for fine sand samples.