“only marginally significant”

It should also be noted that although the interaction of worries with HWS-PE was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the same trend was observed (i.e., that the effect of COVID-19 worries on anxiety was stronger among individuals with low HWS-PE).

Stable high depressive symptoms were associated with increased stroke hazard compared with stable low/no depressive symptoms across age, race or ethnicity, and sex categories, although the association was only marginally significant among older participants ( P =0.06) (Table 5 ).

When both uncinate WMH and ILF WMH were entered into a model to predict cognition (independent of age, sex, and education), uncinate WMH remained significant ( p = 0.03) while ILF WMH was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The correlation between stomatal density and vein density was only marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.01, p = 0.06).

Patients who developed VAP were younger (although only marginally significant, p -value = 0.06) and more frequently diagnosed with sepsis ( p -value = 0.02).

Differences among the quartiles in advanced understanding were only marginally significant ( F (3,135) = 2.52, p = 0.06; Figure 6 ).

SNP rs761100 was only marginally significant ( t = 1.9, p = 0.06).

Supporting the consistency of this finding, an equivalent relation was found for L DLPFC activations, although these activations were only marginally significant with P = 0.06 (FWE corrected, cluster level threshold).

The only marginally significant result (p = 0.06) suggests a difference in speciation rate between tropically and subtropically distributed lineages, with higher rates in the tropics.

Similarly, culturing with 2‐day PI‐plasma showed a reduction in IL‐1β compared with baseline plasma, although this was only marginally significant ( P = .06; Figure 4F ).

When including alexithymia as a covariate (RM-MANCOVA), the affective priming effect was only marginally significant [congruence: F (1,30) = 3.8, p = 0.06].

Our regression analysis indeed shows that, for either definition, the CRT score is a significant (or marginally significant) predictor of all the categories (Probit regressions with robust standard errors; see panel ( a ) in electronic supplementary material, tables S1–S4) and the interaction between country and CRT is only marginally significant for the choice-based egalitarian variable ( p = 0.06; all the remaining p 's > 0.15; see panel ( a ) in electronic supplementary material, tables S5–S8).

Although E/E′ tended to increase with increasing WC, this relationship was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

Findings indicate significant increases in liking ( p < .01) and sharing ( p < .01) destinations’ Facebook posts, but only marginally significant changes in commenting behavior ( p = .06).

Running another bivariate regression, the association between affective relations with one’s own family and acculturation was tested, being only marginally significant for natives ( β = .22 p = .06), but significant for foreigners ( β = .32, p = .01) and in the full sample ( β = .26, p = .001), supporting Pc4.

However, we found only limited evidence of a dose-response truth® effect on openness to smoking as the difference in the effect between high and medium truth® recall was only marginally significant (p=0.06).

We found a positive but only marginally significant correlation when perspectivation and emotionalization was used simultaneously ( τ = 0.46, p = 0.06).

The effect of affective reaction on sunk-cost scores was only marginally significant under low cognitive load, β = .21, t (123) = 1.90, p = .060, η p 2 = .05.

However, the simple slope was only marginally significant ( p = .06).

Although the variation in practice across grades was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), Grade 9 learners reported the highest level of hygiene practice (M = 0.54), indicating a possible trend.

The difference in physical role was the only marginally significant ( P = 0.06) with slight improvement in SA group (15, 95%CI, − 1–30).

Children born sixth or later have 46% higher odds (OR = 1.46), although this result is only marginally significant (p=0.06).

Also in contrast to the early P3, the SI-perpetrator × Trait-BIS interaction was only marginally significant for the late parietal P3 amplitude, F (4,88) = 2.32, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.10.

bassiana , but the differences were only marginally significant ( p = 0.06–0.10).

We also examined the unadjusted associations in the data with full information on all study variables ( n = 648), in which case the association between the physical activity trajectory groups and depressive symptoms became only marginally significant [ F (2,645) = 2.76, p = 0.06, adjusted R 2 = 0.01].