“only marginally significant”

However, post-hoc multiple comparisons revealed only marginally significant differences for −250 ms SOA (96 % correct) and 0 ms SOA (97.4 correct), p = 0.075.

In-depth examination using partial correlation analysis, while controlling for age and generalized anxiety, indicated that anxiety and anger under gaming conditions displayed only marginally significant correlations with gaming disorder scores (mean anxiety-disorder score: r = 0.296, p = 0.075; mean anger-disorder score: r = 0.319, p = 0.054).

For study 3, component 7 again had significant direct and indirect effects, while the total effect of rMEQ (excluding component 7) was only marginally significant (p = .075), and the direct effect (controlling for component 7) was not significant (p = .463).

However, for both men and women, these differences were only marginally significant between positive and negative conditions (for men: b = 0.99, SE = 0.56, t = 1.78, p = .075, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [−1.10, 2.09] (See S3 Table in S1 File ); for women: b = −1.14, SE = 0.61, t = −1.87, p = .063, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [−2.34, 0.06] (See S4 Table in S1 File ).

The only marginally significant difference between those with PD and the older adults was that older adults more strongly agreed they noted balance improvements (p = 0.075).

Intra‐group comparisons showed no significant differences after ANOVA test between mean T1 ΔPBL and mean T2 ΔPBL in groups 2 and 3, whilst in group 1 the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.075).

Further, although having tried to quit using drugs in the past six months was associated with higher resilience in the unadjusted model (B = 4.72, p = 0.092), this association was only marginally significant after adjusting for confounders (B = 4.98, p = 0.075).

However, the difference in response times between neutral and fearful faces was only marginally significant in the high predictive blocks, F (1,86) = 3.238, p = .075, η p 2 = .036, and significant in the non-predictivity blocks, F (1,86) = 8.888, p = .004, η p 2 = .094.

There were only marginally significant differences in the presence of food being shown on camera [χ 2 (4, 241) = 8.49, p = 0.075], with trends toward #miarecovery showing it less and #arfidrecovery more than would be expected by chance.

All three island reptiles showed evidence of lower PC1 relative to the mainland, although this difference was statistically significant in the two snake species, but only marginally significant ( p = 0.075) in alligator lizards (Figure 4 ; Table 2 ).

Post hoc tests showed that derived words elicited a larger negativity than inflected words ( p = 0.029) but there were only marginally significant differences between derived and monomorphemic words ( p = 0.075) and no reliable differences between inflected and monomorphemic words ( p = 0.268).

The simple slope [ 74 ] of the regression of workplace friendships onto job loss insecurity under high negative gossip was only marginally significant (simple slope = −0.20, t = 1.78, p = 0.076).

The interaction was only marginally significant ( F (2, 176) = 2.61, p = .076).

Cultivar (nested in susceptibility level) explained 7.9% ( p = 0.029) of the variation, but the effect of susceptibility was only marginally significant (3.9%, p = 0.076).

Differences between ranges were only marginally significant when all traits were condensed into a single PC value (PC ALL , P = 0.076).

Numerically, the increase was stronger with high-pass than low-pass filtering, but the difference between central filter types was only marginally significant ( t (99) = 1.79, p = .076, d = 0.02).

In the GSE39582 cohort, the difference was only marginally significant ( Figure 5B ; P = 0.076), although the high EPSTI1 group still had a smaller infiltration abundance than the low EPSTI1 group.

gondii infection when compared to their peers; however, the difference was only marginally significant (21.9% vs. 5.6%; P = 0.076).

Grazers perhaps experience higher mortality during droughts than do either browsers and mixed feeders, though this was only marginally significant, possibly due to small sample size ( F 2,4 = 5.26, p = 0.076; Figure 4 b). 4 DISCUSSION Here, we found (a) that mixed feeders changed their diet during drought to include less C4 grasses, but that drought did not induce dietary shifts in grazers and browsers.

In the phobia‐relevant condition, this difference was only marginally significant ( t (30) = −1.84; p = 0.076; d = 0.34). 3.2.

Nevertheless, this difference was only marginally significant upon scrutiny with the chi-square test (X 2 = 53.576; df = 40; p = 0.076), implying a potential existence of differential item functioning at the difficulty parameter level for men and women.

The pseudogenes on the neo-X showed a higher ratio of genes with female-benefit/male-detriment effects to genes with male-benefit/female-detriment effects than functional genes (16/13 [1.23] versus 29/51 [0.57], respectively), although the difference was only marginally significant ( χ 2 test: χ 2 =3.1, d.f.=1, P =0.076, Table 1 ).

Still, the effect of anticipation was only marginally significant ( b = .999, z = 1.78, p = .076) at the lowest point of the scale (2.31 SD below the mean or restraint score of 0), which corresponds to the most unrestrained individuals.

Although only marginally significant, wing loading ( F 1,24 = 3.447, p = .076) and aspect ratio ( F 1,24 = 3.956, p = .058) tended to be higher in the spring forms (Table 1 ).

In contrast, the three-way interaction for RT was only marginally significant ( F (12,272) = 1.6564; p = 0.076).