“only marginally significant”

Higher overall accuracy was related to larger ΔPe amplitudes (β = 0.28, t = 2.87, p < 0.01), whereas the relationship with BAS was only marginally significant (β = 0.16, t = 1.69, p = 0.09).

This effect was only marginally significant (p=0.09) likely due to considerable intertumoral heterogeneity in response to RCT as suggested by shallow dose–response curve (Figure 4 b).

Search time (1‐>10) We found a main effect of Threat Intensity ( F (2,86) = 4.92, p = .009, ɳ p 2 = 0.103), and pairwise comparisons revealed that search time was slower when the image was neutral ( M = 11.80, 95%CI = 11.10–12.50) compared to when it was moderately threatening ( M = 11.30, 95% CI = 10.60–12.00; t (43) = 3.08, p = .008), but the effect was only marginally significant for the difference between neutral and highly threatening distractors ( M = 11.40, 95% CI = 10.70–12.10; t (43) = 2.03, p = .09).

The interaction was only marginally significant ( p = .09) Overall, when the target was absent from the array, appeal and concreteness influenced search RT , with search terminated earlier when looking for appealing compared to unappealing targets, and when looking for concrete compared to abstract targets.

Finally, the 3-way interaction between WP governmental trust, time, and manipulation was in the correct direction (specifically, indicating more decrease over time of the covariance for the experimental group than the control group, which instead increased, as illustrated in Fig 5 ), but only marginally significant (γ 113 = -0.06, t (255) = 1.71, p = .09) ( S2 File , Note N).

These results were only marginally significant due to decreased sample sizes (binomial p = 0.09, N = 201 and p = 0.06, N = 185, for females and males, respectively).

When we rerun the analysis only for those studies where results were not rated as having a high risk of bias, the overall average effect on time studying is larger in magnitude but less precise and only marginally significant ( SMD ^ Low or med BOB = 0 . 17 ; 95 % CI: − 0 . 03 to 0 . 38 ; p = 0 . 09 ; k = 3 ).

The ANCOVA analysis on the percentage of correct responses on the digit span task, using mean PTAs as covariate, the results showed only marginally significant differences between the 4 age groups, F (3, 79) = 2.20, MSE = 118.31, p = .09.

In the TGF-β2 regression model, population was significant (β = 2.19, p < 0.0001), while it was only marginally significant in the IL-1ra regression model (β = 0.72, p = 0.09).

Post-hoc Tukey tests indicated the following pattern of findings in children's proportion of category-match choices: 5-year-old children made significantly more category-match choices than both 4-year-olds and 3-year-olds (both ps < 0.05), 4-year-old children also made more category-match choices than 3-year-old children but this difference was only marginally significant, p = 0.09.

1 The VTA/SN activation for the OXTR rs53576 interaction at T2 was only marginally significant at p = 0.09.

The difference between 8- and 6-year-old children is only marginally significant (6 y/o–8 y/o: B = 0.44, z = 1.70, p = 0.090).

The impact of coffee consumption on DM risk was only marginally significant (OR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07, p=0.09).

Despite this marked increase, the change compared to ∆FD seq was only marginally significant based on a one-sided Wilcoxon test ( p = 0.09; Fig. 4 c) although this could be due to the small sample size of complex gene families. ∆FD gene of complex gene was also elevated in Sistrurus compared to the overall venom (median ∆FD gene of complex gene families = 0.76; Fig. 4 d) albeit not significantly ( p = 0.56); however, it presented a similar median percent contribution to overall functional divergence (80%).

Patients with delayed graft function showed higher urinary calprotectin levels, however that difference was only marginally significant (819 ng/mL; IQR 346 to 2627 ng/mL; vs. 522 ng/mL; IQR, 262 to 1308 ng/mL; P = 0.09).

Even though the coefficient of individual woman’s participation in health care decisions was only marginally significant ( p = 0.09) in Model 5, women residing in states where larger shares of women made their health care decisions were significantly more likely to use modern contraceptives, net of controls for other covariates.

Moreover, a separate analyses of the Mixed tasks showed that the interaction of decision task by outcome valence was only marginally significant [ F (1, 54) = 3.00, p = 0.09].

The index of moderated mediation was only marginally significant, ß = 0.03, SE = 0.02, z = 1.71, p = .09, 95% CI = [-0.003, 0.06].

It is important to note that the facilitation effect in the N25 condition was only marginally significant, F (1, 59) = 3.04, p = .09, η p 2 = .05, and as such, the facilitation effect mostly stemmed from the N75 condition in which the facilitation was significant, F (1, 59) = 10.32, p < .01, η p 2 = .15.

Nucleotide diversity (π), but not observed heterozygosity, decreased with increasing crop rotation distance in the Columbia Basin, though this relationship was only marginally significant ( R 2 = 30%; p = .09) (Figure 4 ).

At the same time, they showed the mediated relationship for delivery of contingency management treatment was only marginally significant (standardized indirect effect = .006, bootstrap p = .091).

The only difference was that for children who scored in the upper half at T1, the reduction in sympathy from T1 to T2 was only marginally significant, p = .091.

Although the interaction between reader type and component was only marginally significant ( F (4, 192) = 2.33, p = 0.091, η p 2 = 0.046), post hoc comparisons showed that all components peak latency occurred earlier for fast readers ( p < 0.05) than for slow readers, except for the P1 component, where the difference was not significant ( p = 0.49). 3.2.3.

The Ewens-Watterson test did not reveal significant differences from neutral expectations, although the difference between the observed and expected homozygosity statistics was found to be greater, but only marginally significant ( P = 0.091) in the Galápagos penguin ( Table 4 ).

On the other hand, the perceived detectability was only marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.020, F (1, 145) = 2.90, β = 0.140, p = 0.091).