“slight significance”

Analysis of salivary and serum CA125 in patients with malignant tumors (n=44) showed the same pattern (R=0.087; p=0.575; Spearman correlation analysis) of incompatibility as in the whole sample, whereas in the group with benign tumors (n=47) slight significance was obtained which was inversely related to salivary and serum CA125 (R=-0.415; p=0.004; Spearman correlation analysis) ( Fig. 2 ).

Meta-regression showed slight significance, in the most recent articles the OR is decreasing with the time (regression coefficient: b = -0.0548; 95%CI: -0.0968 to -0.0128; P = 0.0105; r-analog: 0.2, Supplementary Figure 2A ).

There was only slight significance ( p = 0.014) between CsCl 8K and CsCl 10K.

Table 2 shows that the gender difference was not significant in the overall negative emotions, except that in Period 2 females showed more worry than males with slight significance ( p = 0.017, d = 0.40).

In multivariable logistic regression analysis including geographic variables only, variable “[number of] Distinct states” was strongly associated with higher odds of success (OR = 1.04, p = 4.57e-36), while trials conducted in more rural settings had lower odds of success with slight significance (OR = 0.86, p = 0.025) as shown in Supplementary Table S6.

While the knockdown cells did show slight significance in expression when compared to isotype controls ( p-value = 0.029), this was far less than the surface expression of HPRT in WT Raji cells ( p-value = 0.0001).

It showed that a subgroup of patients with hip diseases was older than F&A patients and knee patients, just with slight significance ( p < 0.03 and <0.06, respectively).

The Mann–Whitney U test indicated only one slight significance ( p = 0.031) in TNF levels when comparing cases with IMC cca > 0.9 and IMC cca < 0.9.

Preventive Behaviours dropped to nonsignificance ( p > 0.05), while another health behaviour factor, Healthy Eating Habits, gained slight significance (β = 0.078; p = 0.035).

The main effect of message type on perceived attitude change showed slight significance (positive: F(2,477) = 3.29, p = 0.0379, η p 2 = 0.014; negative: F(2,477) = 3.80, p = 0.0231, η p 2 = 0.016).

Generally, no significant differences were noted ( p > 0.05), except for slight significance in blood pressure measurement total scores ( p = 0.038), suggesting minimal impact of the guideline updates on knowledge in specific areas.

Isolation by distance analysis showed slight significance in 2003 ( P = 0.04), with the counter intuitive result of F ST decreasing (becoming more similar) with increasing distance.

For both stability indices, the permuted ANOVAs revealed significances for polymer types ( p = 0.001, Table S2), whereas only τ max showed slight significance for the soil extracts including dH 2 O ( p = 0.04). τ YP showed high effect sizes of the polymer type and the soil extract with ɳp 2 = 0.51 (Table S2) and ɳp 2 = 0.20 while the interaction of both showed medium effect size of ɳp 2 = 0.12.

Correlation between baseline graft height and vertical change at the latest follow-up displayed slight significance when considering change in mm, but not in % ( p = 0.04 and p = 0.30, respectively), suggesting that vertical graft changes are fairly independent of baseline graft height ( Figure 6 A,B). 4.

When rs9271069 is considered alone, only ORCADES cases and controls are statistically different ( p value = 1.02 × 10 –5 ), with slight significance seen in GS ( p value = 0.045).

In addition, married or ever married subjects also showed a higher prevalence of hyperthyroidism than those never married ( p = 0.064), and the difference reached slight significance ( p = 0.046) after controlling for psychopharmaceutical treatment and comorbidity of thyroid diseases.

This observation was based on a statistical group comparison within the subgroup of valgus impacted PHF of 35 patients with a DTI ≥ 1.4 and 10 patients with a DTI < 1.4 with slight significance (p = 0.047) [ 5 ].

The association between PD mortality and blood cadmium level only showed slight significance in Model 2 (95%CI: 1.01–4.56, P = 0.048) but no significance in model1 or model3.

Although the total score increased with slight significance after one month of conventional care without additional home-based IPC device usage, compared with the post-intervention period ( p = 0.048), the follow-up scores at one and two months were still significantly lower than baseline ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CD4+ cell infiltration showed slight significance ( p < 0.05), and there was no evidence of cytotoxicity (Fig. 2F1–F5 ).

When square arch form was taken into consideration, the mean CI-IP of females is more than that of males with slight significance ( P = 0.05) [ Table 1 ].

Variables concerning type or place of residence showed slight significance (p < 0.05).

Covariates (age and premorbid IQ) also contributed to the model, with slight significance ( p < .05).

Statistical significance was assumed whenever p < 0.05, slight significance when p > 0.05 and ≤ 0.07.

No statistical difference (log-rank Mantel-Cox test) in tumor size could be observed between vehicle- and 3AP-treated mice for all tested 3AP concentrations including 10 mg/kg ( P = 0.90), 7.5 mg/kg ( P = 0.07), 5 mg/kg ( P = 0.59), and 2.5 mg/kg ( P = 0.18), while only slight significance was noted for the prexasertib-treated group ( P = 0.05) ( Fig. 9, F and G ).